COMPREHENSIVE INDEX TO ALL

SUPREME COURT 2001 DECISIONS

ACCIDENTS - Contributory negligence - Burden of proof - Lies on the defendant - And the contributory negligence - Must be the cause of the accident (H2) Ololo v. Nigerian Agip Oil (2001) 6 KLR (pt. 124) 2101; (2001) 13 NWLR (Pt. 729) 88

ACTIONS - Abuse of court process - Statement of claim that disclosed a reasonable cause of action - Is not an abuse of the process of the court (H5) Labode v. Otubu (2001) 3 KLR (pt. 117) 699; (2001) 7 NWLR (Pt. 712) 256

ACTIONS - Amendment - Effect - An order of amendment takes effect - Not from the date when the amendment is made or granted - But from the date of the commencement of the action (H4) Vulcan Gases Ltd. v. Gasellschaft Fur Industries (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 121) 1437; (2001) 9 NWLR (Pt. 719) 610

ACTIONS - Capacity of action - "Where an action is brought against the defendant personally and prosecuted to judgment" - Meaning of this phrase - Requirement in trials before native courts (H5) Okukuje v. Akwido (2001) 1 KLR (pt. 113) 1; (2001) 3 NWLR (Pt. 700) 261

ACTIONS - Capacity to sue - The plaintiff must show sufficient interest - Or threat of injury he would suffer - Which he had failed to do - In this case (H2) Yesufu v. Governor Edo State (2001) 6 KLR (pt. 124) 1997; (2001) 13 NWLR (Pt. 731) 517

ACTIONS - Cause of action - Claim - Once the claim discloses a cause of action - It is enough to grant jurisdiction - Despite appellants' contrary submission (H6) Seven UP Ltd. v. Abiola & Sons Ltd. (2001) 6 KLR (pt. 124) 2017; (2001) 13 NWLR (Pt. 730) 469

ACTIONS - Cause of action - Definition of the expression (H1) Ikine v. Edjerode (2001) 12 KLR (pt. 131) 3711; (2001) 18 NWLR (Pt. 745) 446


INDEX OF SUBJECT MATTER ALL SC 2001 DECISIONS

ACTIONS - Cause of action - Definition - How properly defined and explained (H3) P. N. Uddoh Trading Co. Ltd. v. Abere (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 122) 1713; (2001) 5 NWLR (Pt. 122) 1713

ACTIONS - Cause of action - Definition of - Reasonable cause of action - May be held by court to exist - Though the action is unlikely to succeed (H5) A-G Fed v. A-G Abia (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 127) 2599; (2001) 11 NWLR (Pt. 725) 689

ACTIONS - Cause of action - Detinue - Though not established in the statement of claim - Yet a reasonable cause of action was disclosed (H4) Labode v. Otubu (2001) 3 KLR (pt. 117) 699; (2001) 7 NWLR (Pt. 712) 256

ACTIONS - Cause of action - Existence of - To determine whether there is a cause of action or its nature - The court must restrict itself - To the statement of claim (H4) Seven UP Ltd. v. Abiola & Sons Ltd. (2001) 6 KLR (pt. 124) 2017; (2001) 13 NWLR (Pt. 730) 469

ACTIONS - Cause of action - In the present case - When it arose - With a view to determining the limitation period (H4) P. N. Uddoh Trading Co. Ltd. v. Abere (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 122) 1713; (2001) 5 NWLR (Pt. 122) 1713

ACTIONS - Cause of action - Traditional Rulers and Chiefs Edict of 1979 (Bendel State) - The cause of action - Did not accrue until appointments were made - In accordance with the Edict (H3) Ikine v. Edjerode (2001) 12 KLR (pt. 131) 3711; (2001) 18 NWLR (Pt. 745) 446

ACTIONS - Cause of Action - Date of arising - Relevant date when the cause of action accrued - Is misconceived by appellant (H1) Julius Berger Nig. Plc. v. Omogui (2001) 6 KLR (pt. 125) 2237; (2001) 15 NWLR (Pt. 736) 401

ACTIONS - Claims - Non existing legal right - Section 7(1) of Decree


INDEX OF SUBJECT MATTER ALL SC 2001 DECISIONS

No. 36 of 1996 - Where no property was vested in the plaintiff under the subsection - It has nothing to protect by way of injunction - Arising by operation of the subsection (H6) A-G Ondo State v. A-G Ekiti State (2001) 9/10 KLR (pt. 129) 3161; (2001) 17 NWLR (Pt. 743) 706

ACTIONS - Claims - Contract - The appellant's claim was hinged on contract arising out of a loan transaction - Since his main relief was a contractual relief (H7) Makwe v. Nwukor (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 126) 2573; (2001) 14 NWLR (Pt. 733) 356

ACTIONS - Claims - Departure from endorsed claim - Gives rise to new cause of action - For which the court's jurisdiction has not been invoked (H2) Adenuga v. Odumeru (2001) 1 KLR (pt. 114) 197; (2001) 2 NWLR (Pt. 696) 184

ACTIONS - Claims - Reliefs sought must be within the scope of the claim - As plaintiff is limited by his claim (H1) Adenuga v. Odumeru (2001) 1 KLR (pt. 114) 197; (2001) 2 NWLR (Pt. 696) 184

ACTIONS - Commencement - By an agent - Without the authority of the purported plaintiff - Such a plaintiff can ratify the act (H2) Vulcan Gases Ltd. v. Gasellschaft Fur Industries (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 121) 1437; (2001) 9 NWLR (Pt. 719) 610

ACTIONS - Customary court - Representative action - Meaning of a representative - It must be apparent on the record - That the suit is defended on behalf of one's family (H3) Okukuje v. Akwido (2001) 1 KLR (pt. 113) 1; (2001) 3 NWLR (Pt. 700) 261

ACTIONS - Determination - Claim - Court is not obliged to examine separately every averment - In the statement of claim - But can consider it as a whole - Or refer to relevant averments only (H5) Seven UP Ltd. v. Abiola & Sons Ltd. (2001) 6 KLR (pt. 124) 2017; (2001) 13 NWLR (Pt. 730) 469

ACTIONS - Dispute - Averments in pleading as to existence of a dis


INDEX OF SUBJECT MATTER ALL SC 2001 DECISIONS

pute - Are to be taken as true ex facie - Towards sustaining the action (H1) A-G Fed v. A-G Abia (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 127) 2599; (2001) 11 NWLR (Pt. 725) 689

ACTIONS - Fresh action - Declaration of title - Anchored on a previous judgment - Must be proved afresh - And the action will fail upon a successful defence of res judicata (H7) Ikeni v. Efamo (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 122) 1603; (2001) 10 NWLR (Pt. 720) 1

ACTIONS - Frivolity of - Issues raised by the statement of claim - Are not frivolous or vexatious - To warrant granting of the preliminary objections (H9) A-G Fed v. A-G Abia (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 127) 2599; (2001) 11 NWLR (Pt. 725) 689

ACTIONS - Fundamental Rights Procedure - Justiciability - Cannot be sustained - Where alleged breach of fundamental right is incidental to the main complaint (H3) Sea Trucks Ltd. v. Anigboro (2001) 1 KLR (pt. 114) 137; (2001) 2 NWLR (Pt. 696) 159

ACTIONS - Immunity from legal action - Conferred on Governors - By s. 308(1)(a) of the 1999 Constitution - Applies to discontinue pending suits against appellants (H2) Tinubu v. I.M.B. Securities Ltd. (2001) 9/10 KLR (pt. 129) 3087; (2001) 16 NWLR (Pt. 740) 670

ACTIONS - Issues - Principles applicable in a case - Are determined by the basic issues in the case (H2) Obasohan v. Omorodion (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 128) 3015; (2001) 13 NWLR (Pt. 729) 206

ACTIONS - Issues - Amounting to academic exercise - Will not be entertained by the court as in this case (H7) Global Trans. Oceanico S.A. v. Free Ent. Ltd. (2001) 2 KLR (pt. 115) 521; (2001) 5 NWLR (Pt. 706) 426

ACTIONS - Justiciability - Fundamental Rights Procedure Rules 1979 - Justiciability of a cause under the Rules - Is not exclusively the preserve of trial judge (H2) Sea Trucks Ltd. v. Anigboro (2001) 1 KLR (pt. 114) 137; (2001) 2 NWLR (Pt. 696) 159


INDEX OF SUBJECT MATTER ALL SC 2001 DECISIONS

ACTIONS - Legal practitioner - Authority of Counsel - At the trial of an action- Extends when it is not expressly limited - To the whole of the court action - But it does not fetter the discretion of the court (H9) Vulcan Gases Ltd. v. Gasellschaft Fur Industries (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 121) 1437; (2001) 9 NWLR (Pt. 719) 610

ACTIONS - Limitation of action - Statute bar - Where the action was filed - After the period limited by law had expired - The action is statute barred - As in the present case (H5) P. N. Uddoh Trading Co. Ltd. v. Abere (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 122) 1713; (2001) 5 NWLR (Pt. 122) 1713

ACTIONS - Locus - Bill of lading - Act of transfer of bill of lading to a clearing agent - Cannot divest the plaintiff of the right to sue - For loss of some of the goods (H4) Boothia Inc. v. Fareast Ltd. (2001) 4 KLR (pt. 119) 1107; (2001) 9 NWLR (Pt. 719) 527

ACTIONS - Locus standi - Respondent had a right to sue - For non delivery of the pallets of paper to it - As the pallets belonged to him at all material times (H9) Global Trans. Oceanico S.A. v. Free Ent. Ltd. (2001) 2 KLR (pt. 115) 521; (2001) 5 NWLR (Pt. 706) 426

ACTIONS - Locus standi - The plaintiff in this case - Has the standing to sue - As he has sufficient interest in the subject matter (H4) Ajayi v. Jolayemi (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 122) 1689; (2001) 10 NWLR (Pt. 722) 516

ACTIONS - Locus Standi - Federal government - Federation account - Existence of justiciable dispute with defendants - Grants it the locus to sue (H6) A-G Fed v. A-G Abia (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 127) 2599; (2001) 11 NWLR (Pt. 725) 689

ACTIONS - Negligence - An action in negligence - Can succeed only if actual damage is proved (H3) Makwe v. Nwukor (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 126) 2573; (2001) 14 NWLR (Pt. 733) 356


INDEX OF SUBJECT MATTER ALL SC 2001 DECISIONS

ACTIONS - Negligence - The appellant's action - Was not grounded in tort of negligence - With regard to his pleadings and evidence (H6) Makwe v. Nwukor (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 126) 2573; (2001) 14 NWLR (Pt. 733) 356

ACTIONS - Orders - Where an action is improperly constituted - The proper order to make is striking out - Not dismissal - And such order totally determines the case (H3) Gov. of Kogi State v. Yakubu (2001) 3 KLR (pt. 118) 903; (2001) 6 NWLR (Pt. 710) 521

ACTIONS - Parties - Business name - A person carrying on business in a name or style other than his own name - May be sued in such name or style - But cannot sue in his trade name (H3) Iyke Medical Merchandise v. Pfizer Inc. (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 121) 1377; (2001) 10 NWLR (Pt. 722) 540

ACTIONS - Parties - Master & Servant - Federal civil service commission - Not being a party in the present action - Cannot be forced to take responsibility of plaintiff as its employer - When it did not employ him (H5) Okomu Oil Ltd. v. Iserhienrhien (2001) 3 KLR (pt. 117) 797; (2001) 6 NWLR (Pt. 710) 660

ACTIONS - Parties - Partnership - A firm composed of two or more partners - May sue or be sued in the firm's name (H1) Iyke Medical Merchandise v. Pfizer Inc. (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 121) 1377; (2001) 10 NWLR (Pt. 722) 540

ACTIONS - Parties - Partnership - A plaintiff who sues such partners in their firm's name - Is taken to have sued than individually (H2) Iyke Medical Merchandise v. Pfizer Inc. (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 121) 1377; (2001) 10 NWLR (Pt. 722) 540

ACTIONS - Parties - Partnership and Business name - Ascertaining the name of the proprietor - For the purpose of suing them - Is not necessary (H4) Iyke Medical Merchandise v. Pfizer Inc. (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 121) 1377; (2001) 10 NWLR (Pt. 722) 540


INDEX OF SUBJECT MATTER ALL SC 2001 DECISIONS

ACTIONS - Parties - Persons who conceal their names - Can be sues in the name in which they carry on business (H6) Iyke Medical Merchandise v. Pfizer Inc. (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 121) 1377; (2001) 10 NWLR (Pt. 722) 540

ACTIONS - Parties - Unincorporated business enterprise - Can be sued eo nomine - And there is no need to first ascertain the nature of ownership of an unincorporated business enterprise - Before determining whether it can be sued eo nomine (H5) Iyke Medical Merchandise v. Pfizer Inc. (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 121) 1377; (2001) 10 NWLR (Pt. 722) 540

ACTIONS - Power of attorney - Commencement of action pursuant to such power - The donee must sue in the name of the donor (H3) Vulcan Gases Ltd. v. Gasellschaft Fur Industries (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 121) 1437; (2001) 9 NWLR (Pt. 719) 610

ACTIONS - Procedural irregularity - As to commencing action by originating summons - Being merely directive - Can be waived by the Supreme Court - In the interest of justice under O. 10 r. 1(1) (H8) A-G Fed v. A-G Abia (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 127) 2599; (2001) 11 NWLR (Pt. 725) 689

ACTIONS - Relief sought - Damages and injunction - The appellants failed to prove - Any act by the respondent - On which such reliefs can be based - Despite his being the owner of the property (H5) Onagoruwa v. Akinremi (2001) 6 KLR (pt. 124) 2055; (2001) 13 NWLR (Pt. 729) 38

ACTIONS - Representative action - Judgments therein - Are not personal to the individuals - But would survive their death (H7) Jack v. Whyte (2001) 3 KLR (pt. 118) 937; (2001) 6 NWLR (Pt. 709) 266

ACTIONS - Statute bar - Effect - A statute barred action - Cannot be maintained - Or properly instituted - And should be struck out from the trial court (H6) P. N. Uddoh Trading Co. Ltd. v. Abere (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 122) 1713; (2001) 5 NWLR (Pt. 122) 1713


INDEX OF SUBJECT MATTER ALL SC 2001 DECISIONS

ACTIONS - Statute bar - Plaintiff's action was filed within time - And is not statute barred (H2) Julius Berger Nig. Plc. v. Omogui (2001) 6 KLR (pt. 125) 2237; (2001) 15 NWLR (Pt. 736) 401

ACTIONS - Tort - Detinue - Meaning of - Detention of the Chattel is wrongful - If the defendant's possession is adverse to the plaintiff's right (H1) Labode v. Otubu (2001) 3 KLR (pt. 117) 699; (2001) 7 NWLR (Pt. 712) 256

ACTIONS - Torts - Alternative claim - In the tort of unlawful interference with business - Grounded wrongfully on breach of contract - The alternative claim must fail (H2) Sparklin Brew. Ltd. v. Union Bank (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 128) 2911; (2001) 15 NWLR (Pt. 737) 539

ACTIONS - Wrongful dismissal - Relief should be obtained by writ of summons in High Court - Not by application under Fundamental Rights (Enforcement Procedure) Rules (H5) Sea Trucks Ltd. v. Anigboro (2001) 1 KLR (pt. 114) 137; (2001) 2 NWLR (Pt. 696) 159

ADMINISTRATION OF ESTATE - Actions - Commencement - An action in an administration of estate - Must be commenced by writ (H5) Igunbor v. Afolabi (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 121) 152; (2001) 11 NWLR (Pt. 723) 148

ADMINISTRATION OF ESTATES - Coadministrator of an intestate - Application to be joined as a party in a suit - Can be brought by motion (H7) Igunbor v. Afolabi (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 121) 152; (2001) 11 NWLR (Pt. 723) 148

ADMINISTRATION OF ESTATES - Land Use Act - Succession - Right of Occupancy - Deemed holders - Where parties' fathers died before commencement of the Act - And the parties succeeded to the interest of their fathers - They become deemed holders of statutory right of occupancy (H6) Obasohan v. Omorodion (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 128) 3015; (2001) 13 NWLR (Pt. 729) 206


INDEX OF SUBJECT MATTER ALL SC 2001 DECISIONS

ADMINISTRATION OF ESTATES - Probate actions - And probate matters - Distinction between them (H6) Igunbor v. Afolabi (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 121) 152; (2001) 11 NWLR (Pt. 723) 148

ADMINISTRATION OF ESTATES - Probate - Interlocutory matter relating to probate - Is required to be initiated by way of motion (H8) Igunbor v. Afolabi (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 121) 152; (2001) 11 NWLR (Pt. 723) 148

ADMINISTRATION OF ESTATES - Proceedings - Governing law - Proceedings in respect of the administration of estates - Is governed by the High Court Law and Rules of procedure made thereunder (H4) Igunbor v. Afolabi (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 121) 152; (2001) 11 NWLR (Pt. 723) 148

ADMINISTRATIVE LAW - Abuse of office - Public Officers Protection Law s. 2(a) - Abuse of office and bad faith - Deprive a party the protection of that provision - And burden of proof is on plaintiff (H7) Offoboche v. Ogoja L.G. (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 128) 2843; (2001) 16 NWLR (Pt. 739) 458

ADMINISTRATIVE LAW - Abuse of office - What it means (H5) Offoboche v. Ogoja L.G. (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 128) 2843; (2001) 16 NWLR (Pt. 739) 458

ADMINISTRATIVE LAW - Company - Meetings of the company - Minutes thereof - Absence of minutes - Does not render the meeting void - It only attracts a penalty (H1) Nsirim v. Onuma Construction Co. Ltd. (2001) 3 KLR (pt. 118) 853; (2001) 7 NWLR (Pt. 713) 742

ADMINISTRATIVE LAW - Conduct of medical practitioner - Refusal of an adult patient to give informed consent - Leaves the practitioner helpless to impose medical treatment - Barring intervention from the courts - Options open to the practitioner in such cases (H13) Medical Tribunal v. Dr. Okonkwo (2001) 3 KLR (pt. 117) 739; (2001) 7 NWLR (Pt. 711) 206


INDEX OF SUBJECT MATTER ALL SC 2001 DECISIONS

ADMINISTRATIVE LAW - Disciplinary action - Commission of offence - Admission of guilt - Jurisdiction of the court - An administrative body which acts on the admission of guilt by the accused - Has not usurped the constitutional jurisdiction of the court (H 6) Dongtoe v. Civil Service Commission Plateau State (2001) 4 KLR (pt. 120) 1239; (2001) 9 NWLR (Pt. 717) 132

ADMINISTRATIVE LAW - Master & servant - Appointment - Power to appoint implies the power to remove - Evidence shows that plaintiff was appointed by the defendant - And not by Federal Civil Service Commission (H3) Okomu Oil Ltd. v. Iserhienrhien (2001) 3 KLR (pt. 117) 797; (2001) 6 NWLR (Pt. 710) 660

ADMINISTRATIVE LAW - Master & servant - Resignation of appointment - Need not be formally accepted by the employer - Before taking effect (H1) Yesufu v. Gov. Edo State (2001) 6 KLR (pt. 124) 1997; (2001) 13 NWLR (Pt. 731) 517

ADMINISTRATIVE LAW - Tribunal - Created under the Act - Procedure - For prosecution and trial of offences that fall within those triable in a tribunal - Must strictly be followed (H5) Miscellaneous Offences Tribunal v. Okoroafor (2001) 9/10 KLR (pt. 129) 3233; (2001) 18 NWLR (Pt. 745) 295

ADMINISTRATIVE LAW - Tribunals - A charge before a disciplinary committee - Should not be construed - To charge an offence not expressly mentioned (H4) Medical Tribunal v. Dr. Okonkwo (2001) 3 KLR (pt. 117) 739; (2001) 7 NWLR (Pt. 711) 206

AFFIDAVITS - Conflict resolution - Failure to file better affidavit to contradict defendant's counter affidavit - Means that defendant's story is unchallenged (H1) A-G Ondo State v. A-G Ekiti State (2001) 9/10 KLR (pt. 129) 3161; (2001) 17 NWLR (Pt. 743) 706

AFFIDAVITS - Conflicts in affidavit - The authority of Nwosu v. Imo State Environmental Sanitation Authority is not applicable - And is distinguished (H4) Chairman N.P.C. v. Chairman Ikere LG.A (2001)


INDEX OF SUBJECT MATTER ALL SC 2001 DECISIONS

7 KLR (pt. 128) 2805; (2001) 13 NWLR (Pt. 731) 540

AFFIDAVITS - Contradictions - In the circumstances of this case - The court below was wrong to choose one side of the story - Without giving opportunity to resolve the contradictions (H2) First Bank v. May Medical Clinics (2001) 4 KLR (pt. 119) 1023; (2001) 9 NWLR (Pt. 717) 28

AFFIDAVITS - Documents - Resolution of disputed facts by documents - The weight and value of the documents tendered by the appellant - Are dependent on oral evidence of witnesses - And it was wrong to elevate it to conclusive evidence of their contents (H3) Chairman N.P.C. v. Chairman Ikere LG.A (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 128) 2805; (2001) 13 NWLR (Pt. 731) 540

AFFIDAVITS - Extraneous paragraphs - In contravention of section 87 of the Evidence Act - Should be struck out (H3) Bamaiyi v. State (2001) 4 KLR (pt. 119) 1043; (2001) 8 NWLR (Pt. 715) 270

AFFIDAVITS - Opposing facts - Affidavit containing diametrically opposing material facts - Must be resolved by viva voce evidence - Not by picking and choosing which to believe (H1) First Bank v. May Medical Clinics (2001) 4 KLR (pt. 119) 1023; (2001) 9 NWLR (Pt. 717) 28

AFFIDAVITS - Resolving conflicts in affidavits - The principle laid down in Falobi v. Falobi - Applies to a variety proceedings - And is not restricted (H1) Chairman N.P.C. v. Chairman Ikere Local Govt. (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 128) 2805; (2001) 13 NWLR (Pt. 731) 540

AGENCY - Action - Commencement - By an agent - Without the authority of the purported plaintiff - Such a plaintiff can ratify the act (H2) Vulcan Gases Ltd. v. Gasellschaft Fur Industries (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 121) 1437; (2001) 9 NWLR (Pt. 719) 610

AGENCY - Action of agent without Authority - Will not bind the principal - Especially as the plaintiff was represented by a solicitor -


INDEX OF SUBJECT MATTER ALL SC 2001 DECISIONS

And knew of the limits of the agents authority (H7) Incar Nig. Plc v. Bolex Enterprises (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 123) 1823; (2001) 12 NWLR (Pt. 728) 646; (2001) 12 NWLR (Pt. 728) 646

AGENCY - Creation - How the relationship of principal and agent may arise (H1) Vulcan Gases Ltd. v. Gasellschaft Fur Industries (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 121) 1437; (2001) 9 NWLR (Pt. 719) 610

AGENCY - Documents - Interpretation - Of Exhibit A by the court - Gives no power to the firm - To sell the property to any party - Who furnished the purchase price (H5) Incar Nig. Plc v. Bolex Enterprises (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 123) 1823; (2001) 12 NWLR (Pt. 728) 646; (2001) 12 NWLR (Pt. 728) 646

AGENCY - Limit of Agency - Was clearly stipulated in Exhibit H - As only scouting for buyers - And communicating same to the company for its acceptance (H4) Incar Nig. Plc v. Bolex Enterprises (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 123) 1823; (2001) 12 NWLR (Pt. 728) 646; (2001) 12 NWLR (Pt. 728) 646

AGENCY - Power of attorney - Commencement of action pursuant to such power - The donee must sue in the name of the donor (H3) Vulcan Gases Ltd. v. Gasellschaft Fur Industries (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 121) 1437; (2001) 9 NWLR (Pt. 719) 610

AGENCY - Proof - Claim based on alleged agency relationship - Was not proved - Award of N12.1 million as special and general damages - Cannot stand (H3) Narindex Ltd. v. Inter-Continental Bank (2001) 4 KLR (pt. 120) 1321; (2001) 10 NWLR (Pt. 721) 321

AGENCY - Purpose of agency - Exhibit H constituted the firm an agent of the company - To look for buyers for its property - Not for the purpose of concluding a contract of sale - Of the property in dispute (H3) Incar Nig. Plc v. Bolex Enterprises (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 123) 1823; (2001) 12 NWLR (Pt. 728) 646; (2001) 12 NWLR (Pt. 728) 646


INDEX OF SUBJECT MATTER ALL SC 2001 DECISIONS

ALIBI - Consideration of - Any plausible defence raised by the defence - Or arising casually or by the tenor of evidence - Must be considered by the court (H4) Udoebre v. State (2001) 6 KLR (pt. 124) 1945; (2001) 12 NWLR (Pt. 728) 617

ALIBI - Defence of - Failure to investigate or consider the defence - Will lead to quashing a conviction on appeal - If it has occasioned a miscarriage of justice (H5) Udoebre v. State (2001) 6 KLR (pt. 124) 1945; (2001) 12 NWLR (Pt. 728) 617

ALIBI - Defence of - Was rightly rejected by court - Because of the credible witnesses that identified the appellants at the scene of crime - And the roles they played at the scene (H7) Awopejo v. State (2001) 12 KLR (pt. 131) 3579; (2001) 18 NWLR (Pt. 745) 430

ALIBI - Failure to investigate - Consequence - Where there is positive evidence which cancels the alibi - Failure to investigate the alibi - Would not be fatal to conviction (H1) Odu v. State (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 122) 1551; (2001) 10 NWLR (Pt. 722) 668

ALIBI - Onus - Of establishing the defence - Is on the accused - Even if the police has failed to investigate the observation (H2) Odu v. State (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 122) 1551; (2001) 10 NWLR (Pt. 722) 668

ALIBI - Proof - Alibi places an onus on prosecution - To prove beyond reasonable doubt - The presence of the accused at the scene of the offence (H4) Dogo v. State (2001) 1 KLR (pt. 114) 329; (2001) 3 NWLR (Pt. 699) 192

ALIBI - Vagueness of - Where the alibi consist of vague accounts - Devoid of material facts capable of investigation - It cannot avail an accused person (H8) Udoebre v. State (2001) 6 KLR (pt. 124) 1945; (2001) 12 NWLR (Pt. 728) 617

APPEALS - Appellate court - Reevaluation of evidence - Was rightly declined - As they were not proved to be perverse (H3) Abidoye v. Alawode (2001) 3 KLR (pt. 118) 917; (2001) 6 NWLR (Pt. 709)


INDEX OF SUBJECT MATTER ALL SC 2001 DECISIONS

463

APPEALS - Briefs - Additional grounds of Appeal - Which are not incorporated in an Amended Notice of Appeal - Cannot be argued in the brief - Or the brief will become incompetent (H2) Korede v. Adedokun (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 128) 2829; (2001) 15 NWLR (Pt. 736) 483

APPEALS - Briefs - Argument in a brief - On issues not backed by the grounds of appeal - Will be discountenanced and struck out (H2) Adah v. Adah (2001) 2 KLR (pt. 115) 491; (2001) 5 NWLR (Pt. 705) 1

APPEALS - Briefs - Court of Appeal - Where the Rules do not provide for the filing of briefs in a matter - It is not enough to dismiss an appeal because a brief of argument was filed (H9) Miscellaneous Offences Tribunal v. Okoroafor (2001) 9/10 KLR (pt. 129) 3233; (2001) 18 NWLR (Pt. 745) 295

APPEALS - Competence - Leave to appeal - Grounds of appeal - Where some of the grounds are of pure law - The appeal is competent without leave of court (H2) P. N. Uddoh Trading Co. Ltd. v. Abere (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 122) 1713; (2001) 5 NWLR (Pt. 122) 1713

APPEALS - Competence - Supreme Court is only competent - To entertain appeals - From the Court of Appeal not from the trial court (H3) Olatunde v. Abidogun (2001) 12 KLR (pt. 131) 3653; (2001) 18 NWLR (Pt. 746) 712

APPEALS - Concurrent finding of facts - The court cannot interfere - Where the plaintiff has not adduced enough reasons (H1) Ibhafidon v. Igbinosun (2001) 4 KLR (pt. 120) 1167; (2001) 8 NWLR (Pt. 716) 653

APPEALS - Concurrent findings - Appellant who desires court to upset them - Must show that the findings violate some principles of law or procedure (H1) Olatunde v. Abidogun (2001) 12 KLR (pt. 131) 3653;


INDEX OF SUBJECT MATTER ALL SC 2001 DECISIONS

(2001) 18 NWLR (Pt. 746) 712

APPEALS - Concurrent findings of fact - As they are supported by adequately evaluated evidence - They are not perverse - And will not be interfered with by the Supreme Court (H5) Aseimo v. Abraham (2001) 6 KLR (pt. 124) 2125; (2001) 16 NWLR (Pt. 738) 20

APPEALS - Concurrent findings of fact - Have not been faulted in any way - So the plaintiff's claim must fail (H4) Abimbola v. Abatan (2001) 4 KLR (pt. 120) 1149; (2001) 9 NWLR (Pt. 717) 66

APPEALS - Concurrent findings of fact - The court will not lightly interfere with such findings - Unless they are perverse and unreasonable (H6) Afegbai v. A-G Edo State (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 127) 2709; (2001) 14 NWLR (Pt. 733) 425

APPEALS - Concurrent findings of fact - The court will not disturb concurrent findings of facts of the lower courts - Except in exceptional circumstances (H6) Ojengbede v. Esan (2001) 12 KLR (pt. 131) 3531; (2001) 18 NWLR (Pt. 746) 771

APPEALS - Concurrent findings of fact - Was rightly affirmed - In absence of any special circumstances (H4) Abidoye v. Alawode (2001) 3 KLR (pt. 118) 917; (2001) 6 NWLR (Pt. 709) 463

APPEALS - Concurrent findings of fact - Will be disturbed - If perverse or leading to miscarriage of justice (H5) Dogo v. State (2001) 1 KLR (pt. 114) 329; (2001) 3 NWLR (Pt. 699) 192

APPEALS - Concurrent findings of fact - Will not be disturbed unless they are shown to be perverse or substantially wrong - And will occasion a miscarriage of justice (H8) Odonigi v. Oyeleke (2001) 2 KLR (pt. 116) 625; (2001) 6 NWLR (Pt. 708) 12

APPEALS - Concurrent findings of fact - Will not be interfered with by Supreme Court - In the absence of sufficient reasons (H4) Ojo v. Azama (2001) 1 KLR (pt. 113) 81; (2001) 4 NWLR (Pt. 702) 57


INDEX OF SUBJECT MATTER ALL SC 2001 DECISIONS

APPEALS - Concurrent findings of fact - Will not be interfered with by the court - Except they are shown to be perverse (H4) Aseimo v. Abraham (2001) 6 KLR (pt. 124) 2125; (2001) 16 NWLR (Pt. 738) 20

APPEALS - Concurrent findings of facts - Attitude of Supreme Court to such findings - Is not to interfere - Save where perverse (H9) Dongtoe v. Civil Service Commission Plateau State (2001) 4 KLR (pt. 120) 1239; (2001) 9 NWLR (Pt. 717) 132

APPEALS - Concurrent findings of facts - Circumstances when the Supreme Court will interfere with such findings (H2) Biariko v. Edeh-Ogwuile (2001) 4 KLR (pt. 120) 1213; (2001) 12 NWLR (Pt. 726) 235

APPEALS - Concurrent findings of facts - If supported by sufficient evidence - Should not be disturbed - By appellate court (H2) Adeye v. Adesanya (2001) 2 KLR (pt. 116) 595; (2001) 6 NWLR (Pt. 708) 1

APPEALS - Concurrent findings of lower courts - Are perverse and are set aside - And the order of specific performance set aside (H8) Incar Nig. Plc v. Bolex Enterprises (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 123) 1823; (2001) 12 NWLR (Pt. 728) 646; (2001) 12 NWLR (Pt. 728) 646

APPEALS - Concurrent findings - The appellant has not advanced cogent reasons - To overturn the findings of the court below (H2) Olatunde v. Abidogun (2001) 12 KLR (pt. 131) 3653; (2001) 18 NWLR (Pt. 746) 712

APPEALS - Concurrent findings - Title - The court below rightly granted the declaration of title - And the reasons for the findings are unassailable - And should not be disturbed (H10) Temile v. Awani (2001) 6 KLR (pt. 125) 2159; (2001) 12 NWLR (Pt. 728) 726

APPEALS - Concurrent findings - Will not be disturbed - Except the


INDEX OF SUBJECT MATTER ALL SC 2001 DECISIONS

adversary party - Shows that the circumstances of his case falls into the exceptions to the law (H11) Oduneye v. State (2001) 1 KLR (pt. 114) 355; (2001) 2 NWLR (Pt. 697) 311

APPEALS - Confessions - Failure of trial court - The Court of Appeal rightly relied on the confessions - Though the trial court did not do so - Due to a misapplication of the law (H8) Akpan v. State (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 127) 2767; (2001) 15 NWLR (Pt. 737) 745

APPEALS - Constitutional Law - Question referred - That amounted to putting the cart before the horse - The Court of Appeal is right - To refuse to answer the question (H5) Bamaiyi v. A-G Fed. (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 128) 2939; (2001) 12 NWLR (Pt. 727) 468

APPEALS - Contradictions in lower courts judgment - There was no contradiction as alleged - And so the defence of contributory negligence was validly made out (H4) Ololo v. Nig. Agip Oil (2001) 6 KLR (pt. 124) 2101; (2001) 13 NWLR (Pt. 729) 88

APPEALS - Conviction - Expunged evidence - As the conviction is supported by overwhelming evidence - Despite the expunged evidence - The conviction is confirmed (H16) Udoebre v. State (2001) 6 KLR (pt. 124) 1945; (2001) 12 NWLR (Pt. 728) 617

APPEALS - Conviction - Propriety of - Conviction of appellant for a different offence - Was rightly confirmed by the court of Appeal - In the present case (H4) Oduneye v. State (2001) 1 KLR (pt. 114) 355; (2001) 2 NWLR (Pt. 697) 311

APPEALS - Criminal defences - Concurrent findings - That defence of accident failed - Will not be disturbed - As there was no miscarriage of justice (H2) Amayo v. State (2001) 12 KLR (pt. 130) 3551; (2001) 18 NWLR (Pt. 745) 251

APPEALS - Cross appeal - Where respondents have not filed a cross appeal against correspondents - They cannot support appellants' motion - As they lack standing in respect of reliefs sought (H6) Adenuga


INDEX OF SUBJECT MATTER ALL SC 2001 DECISIONS

v. Odumeru (2001) 1 KLR (pt. 114) 197; (2001) 2 NWLR (Pt. 696) 184

APPEALS - Damages - Appeal court may upset the award of damages - By trial court if a wrong principle of law was applied (H6) A.C.B. Ltd. v. Apugo (2001) 2 KLR (pt. 116) 653; (2001) 5 NWLR (Pt. 707) 483

APPEALS - Damages - General principle - Approach of the appellate court to award of damages by the trial court - When the appellate court should exercise the power of review (H13) Offoboche v. Ogoja L.G. (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 128) 2843; (2001) 16 NWLR (Pt. 739) 458

APPEALS - Damages - Special damages - Awarded by the trial judge - Was validly set aside - As it was not strictly proved by the plaintiff (H5) Ololo v. Nig. Agip Oil (2001) 6 KLR (pt. 124) 2101; (2001) 13 NWLR (Pt. 729) 88

APPEALS - Decisions - Duty of trial judge - Is to reach a decision - Only upon the basis of what is in issue - And what has been demonstrated by evidence supported by law - Failure in this duty - Will make the appellate court to intervene (H4) Adeleke v. Iyanda (2001) 6 KLR (pt. 124) 1973; (2001) 13 NWLR (Pt. 729) 1

APPEALS - Discretion - Leave to argue new points of law - Supreme Court will not interfere with the lower court's exercise of discretion - Except where it is not bona fide (H6) Eze v. Attorney-General Rivers State (2001) 12 KLR (pt. 131) 3611; (2001) 18 NWLR (Pt. 746) 524

APPEALS - Dismissal - Death of appellant - An appeal shall not be dismissed - For the mere reason that the appellant is dead (H3) Osagunna v. Gov. Ekiti State (2001) 4 KLR (pt. 119) 1081

APPEALS - Dismissal - Equity - As delay defeats equity - Court should have dismissed the appeal of the plaintiff (H3) Igbinokpogie v. Ogedegbe (2001) 12 KLR (pt. 131) 3595; (2001) 18 NWLR (Pt.


INDEX OF SUBJECT MATTER ALL SC 2001 DECISIONS

745) 412

APPEALS - Dismissal - Exercise of Discretion - The considerations on which the Court of Appeal exercised its discretion - Were not judicious or judicial or proper (H1) Ogundoyin v. Adeyemi (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 127) 2687; (2001) 13 NWLR (Pt. 730) 403

APPEALS - Dismissal of claim - Was rightly done - As plaintiff failed in his duty - To reconcile conflicting facts in his exhibits - Which went to the root of the matter (H2) Ibhafidon v. Igbinosun (2001) 4 KLR (pt. 120) 1167; (2001) 8 NWLR (Pt. 716) 653

APPEALS - Duty of appellate court - Is to take a dispassionate look - At the real issue - So as to arrive at the justice of the matter - As it rightly did in this case (H1) Obulor v. Oboro (2001) 4 KLR (pt. 119) 1071; (2001) 8 NWLR (Pt. 714) 25

APPEALS - Elections - Purported election appeal - Which in substance does not fall under s. 81 (3) of the Decree - Will not be deemed finalized - By the Court of Appeal (H4) Onuaguluchi v. Ndu (2001) 3 KLR (pt. 117) 831; (2001) 7 NWLR (Pt. 712) 309

APPEALS - Error - Court of Appeal was in error - As to have failed to consider and pronounce upon the issues formulated by the appellant (H4) Bamaiyi v. State (2001) 4 KLR (pt. 119) 1043; (2001) 8 NWLR (Pt. 715) 270

APPEALS - Error - Evaluation of evidence - The trial Judge corrected the error - In the first part of his judgment - By further evaluating all the evidence - Before dismissing the claim finally - And so occasioned no miscarriage of justice (H2) Jekpe v. Alokwe (2001) 4 KLR (pt. 119) 985; (2001) 8 NWLR (Pt. 715) 252

APPEALS - Error in judgment - Not every error in a judgment - Will result in the appeal being allowed (H10) Ojengbede v. Esan (2001) 12 KLR (pt. 131) 3531; (2001) 18 NWLR (Pt. 746) 771


INDEX OF SUBJECT MATTER ALL SC 2001 DECISIONS

APPEALS - Error of lower court - Dismissal of counterclaims - In the circumstances of the case - Based on the evidence and applicable law - The Court of Appeal was wrong in dismissing the appellants counterclaim (H13) Kyari v. Alkali (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 123) 1753; (2001) 11 NWLR (Pt. 724) 412

APPEALS - Error of lower court - The court of appeal was in error - In reversing the finding of the trial court - As to location of land (H16) Achiakpa v. Nduka (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 126) 2487; (2001) 14 NWLR (Pt. 734) 623

APPEALS - Error of lower court - The court of Appeal was in error - To refuse to grant the application - For stay of proceedings (H4) United Spinners Ltd. v. Chartered Bank Ltd. (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 127) 2745; (2001) 14 NWLR (Pt. 732) 195

APPEALS - Error of lower court - The lower court was in error - For holding that the case - Was fought in a personal capacity - Because the representation - Was not indicated in the counter claim - Despite the averments in the pleadings - And evidence led at the trial (H16) Kyari v. Alkali (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 123) 1753; (2001) 11 NWLR (Pt. 724) 412

APPEALS - Error of lower courts - Failure to appreciate the issue - Led to distortion of plaintiff's case - Even after he had made out a better case than the defendant (H3) Adeleke v. Iyanda (2001) 6 KLR (pt. 124) 1973; (2001) 13 NWLR (Pt. 729) 1

APPEALS - Error of trial court - The court misdirected itself - By putting into issue - A fact that was not contested by the parties - In their pleadings (H2) Adeleke v. Iyanda (2001) 6 KLR (pt. 124) 1973; (2001) 13 NWLR (Pt. 729) 1

APPEALS - Error of trial judge - Where the trial judge dismissed plaintiff's entire claim - Without evaluating evidence - He was in error - And retrial would have been ordered - If he had closed his judgment at that stage (H1) Jekpe v. Alokwe (2001) 4 KLR (pt. 119) 985;


INDEX OF SUBJECT MATTER ALL SC 2001 DECISIONS

(2001) 8 NWLR (Pt. 715) 252

APPEALS - Error - Retrial - Procedure adopted by the trial court - Was merely a technical error - Which was not inconsistent with the rights of the parties - And does not warrant an order for retrial (H5) Jekpe v. Alokwe (2001) 4 KLR (pt. 120) 985; (2001) 8 NWLR (Pt. 715) 252; (2001) 8 NWLR (Pt. 715) 252

APPEALS - Evaluation of evidence - As the evidence was not properly evaluated by the courts below - They are perverse and will be set aside (H4) Union Bank Plc. v. Emole (2001) 12 KLR (pt. 131) 3559; (2001) 18 NWLR (Pt. 745) 501

APPEALS - Evaluation of evidence - Where not properly done before upholding trial courts finding - Supreme Court will set aside the judgment (H7) Basil v. Fajebe (2001) 4 KLR (pt. 120) 1273; (2001) 11 NWLR (Pt. 725) 592

APPEALS - Evaluation of evidence - Where the trial court had properly evaluated the evidence - The Court of Appeal cannot substitute its own views for that of the trial court (H4) Olatunde v. Abidogun (2001) 12 KLR (pt. 131) 3653; (2001) 18 NWLR (Pt. 746) 712

APPEALS - Evidence - Admissibility - Wrongful admission of evidence - The appellate court has the power to expunge it (H1) Ojengbede v. Esan (2001) 12 KLR (pt. 131) 3531; (2001) 18 NWLR (Pt. 746) 771

APPEALS - Evidence - Affidavits evidence - Contradictions - In the circumstances of this case - The court below was wrong to choose one side of the story - Without giving opportunity to resolve the contradictions (H2) First Bank v. May Medical Clinics (2001) 4 KLR (pt. 120) 1023; (2001) 9 NWLR (Pt. 717) 28; (2001) 9 NWLR (Pt. 717) 28

APPEALS - Evidence - Document - That was discountenanced by the trial judge - In respect of which there was no appeal - It cannot be


INDEX OF SUBJECT MATTER ALL SC 2001 DECISIONS

directly or surreptitiously looked at by the appellate court (H4) Bank of the North v. Yau (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 122) 1561; (2001) 10 NWLR (Pt. 721) 408

APPEALS - Evidence - Documents - Copy of a bank's statement of account - Appellant is estopped from contesting its admissibility - Having failed to object when it was admitted - Without fulfilling the conditions for its admissibility (H7) IBWA v. Imano Ltd. (2001) 3 KLR (pt. 118) 873

APPEALS - Evidence - In the circumstances of this case - There is sufficient unchallenged evidence at trial court - To support the judgment of the Court of Appeal (H10) IBWA v. Imano Ltd. (2001) 3 KLR (pt. 118) 873

APPEALS - Evidence - Revaluation - In the absence of a challenge by the adverse party - As to the credibility of the evidence - The court of Appeal and the supreme court cannot castigate its credibility (H2) Oduneye v. State (2001) 1 KLR (pt. 114) 355; (2001) 2 NWLR (Pt. 697) 311

APPEALS - Evidence - Wrongful admission or expulsion of evidence - Is not an interlocutory decision - And need not be brought under the provision of s. 25 (2)(a) Court of Appeal Act 1976 (H2) Oduneye v. State (2001) 1 KLR (pt. 114) 355; (2001) 2 NWLR (Pt. 697) 311

APPEALS - Exhibits - New issue - On correct interpretation of law to be placed on an exhibit - Ought to be looked into - As Court of Appeal is enjoined - To make a finding on an exhibit omitted by trial court (H3) Eze v. Attorney-General, Rivers State (2001) 12 KLR (pt. 131) 3611; (2001) 18 NWLR (Pt. 746) 524

APPEALS - Failure of lower court - As the lower court failed to correct error of trial judge - Supreme Court is bound to do so - And set aside the judgments (H9) Adeleke v. Iyanda (2001) 6 KLR (pt. 124) 1973; (2001) 13 NWLR (Pt. 729) 1


INDEX OF SUBJECT MATTER ALL SC 2001 DECISIONS

APPEALS - Fair hearing - Issues - Failure to consider all issues posed - Did not amount to denial of fair hearing - As the live issue was considered - And no miscarriage of justice was occasioned (H2) Seven UP Ltd. v. Abiola & Sons Ltd. (2001) 6 KLR (pt. 124) 2017; (2001) 13 NWLR (Pt. 730) 469

APPEALS - Fair hearing s. 33 of the Constitution - Bias alleged against trial judge - Appellate court will not go outside the printed records of court - To conclude that the trial is unfair (H4) Ojengbede v. Esan (2001) 12 KLR (pt. 131) 3531; (2001) 18 NWLR (Pt. 746) 771

APPEALS - Fair hearing - The appeal was rightly allowed - As the procedure for fair hearing - Was not strictly complied with (H1) Psychiatric Hospitals Board v. Edosa (2001) 2 KLR (pt. 116) 3531; (2001) 5 NWLR (Pt. 707) 612

APPEALS - Finality - Election petitions - Finality of Court of Appeal's decision - As provided in s. 81 (1) and (3) of Decree No.5 of 1999 - Makes the present appeal incompetent (H2) Onuaguluchi v. Ndu (2001) 3 KLR (pt. 117) 831; (2001) 7 NWLR (Pt. 712) 309

APPEALS - Finding not appealed against - The court of Appeal was in error - To reverse a finding not appealed against (H18) Achiakpa v. Nduka (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 126) 2487; (2001) 14 NWLR (Pt. 734) 623

APPEALS - Finding of fact - Was a proper exercise judicial discretion - By the trial court - Which used the right approach in making the findings (H5) Abidoye v. Alawode (2001) 3 KLR (pt. 118) 917; (2001) 6 NWLR (Pt. 709) 463

APPEALS - Findings of lower courts - Are amply supported - By abundant evidence on record - From all the witnesses (H4) Abimbola v. Abatan (2001) 4 KLR (pt. 120) 1149; (2001) 9 NWLR (Pt. 717) 66

APPEALS - Findings of trial court - Supreme Court will not interfere


INDEX OF SUBJECT MATTER ALL SC 2001 DECISIONS

with such findings - Except there is a miscarriage of justice - Or violation of law or procedure (H10) Achiakpa v. Nduka (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 126) 2487; (2001) 14 NWLR (Pt. 734) 623

APPEALS - Findings of trial judge - Were wrongly disturbed - By the court below - As they were supported by the evidence (H5) Nwadiogbu v. Nnadozie (2001) 6 KLR (pt. 124) 2081; (2001) 12 NWLR (Pt. 727) 315

APPEALS - Fresh point - Will not ordinarily be entertained - If lower court had not expressed its view - Or is better placed to deal with it (H3) Global Trans. Oceanico S.A. v. Free Ent. Ltd. (2001) 2 KLR (pt. 115) 521; (2001) 5 NWLR (Pt. 706) 426

APPEALS - Ground of appeal - Competence - Since the ground complained against is clear - It is therefore competent and should not have been struck out (H3) Hambe v. Hueze (2001) 2 KLR (pt. 115) 437; (2001) 4 NWLR (Pt. 703) 372

APPEALS - Ground of appeal - Form - Where no one is misled by the contents - Complaint about its form becomes a mere technicality - Which does not occasion a miscarriage of justice (H4) MILAD Benue State v. Ulegede (2001) 9/10 KLR (pt. 129) 3135; (2001) 17 NWLR (Pt. 741) 194

APPEALS - Ground of appeal - Ground of law - How to determine a ground of law (H1) Orakosim v. Menkiti (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 121) 1397; (2001) 9 NWLR (Pt. 719) 529

APPEALS - Ground of appeal - Issues - Where the complaint is not that the issues do not flow from the grounds of appeal - Any complaint about the grounds of appeal is inconsequential (H5) MILAD Benue State v. Ulegede (2001) 9/10 KLR (pt. 129) 3135; (2001) 17 NWLR (Pt. 741) 194

APPEALS - Ground of appeal - Nature of - In determining the nature of a ground of appeal - The ground and its particulars must be


INDEX OF SUBJECT MATTER ALL SC 2001 DECISIONS

read together (H2) Orakosim v. Menkiti (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 121) 1397; (2001) 9 NWLR (Pt. 719) 529

APPEALS - Ground of appeal - Nature of - How to determine whether a ground - Is one of law or of fact (H1) Medical Tribunal v. Dr. Okonkwo (2001) 3 KLR (pt. 117) 739; (2001) 7 NWLR (Pt. 711) 206

APPEALS - Ground of appeal - Omnibus ground - Where there was no evidence to support the trial court's finding of liability - The finding can be challenged on the omnibus ground - Though not very ideal (H3) Sparklin Brew. Ltd. v. Union Bank (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 128) 2911; (2001) 15 NWLR (Pt. 737) 539

APPEALS - Ground of appeal - Which has been struck out - Cannot be used as basis for a decision or judgment (H6) Global Trans. Oceanico S.A. v. Free Ent. Ltd. (2001) 2 KLR (pt. 115) 521; (2001) 5 NWLR (Pt. 706) 426

APPEALS - Grounds of appeal - Alleging error in law and misdirection in fact - Is not ipso facto incompetent - If it otherwise complies with the rules of court (H2) Hambe v. Hueze (2001) 2 KLR (pt. 115) 437; (2001) 4 NWLR (Pt. 703) 372

APPEALS - Grounds of appeal - Alleging error or misdirection - But fails to provide particulars of such error or misdirection - Is incompetent and liable to be struck out (H1) Global Trans. Oceanico S.A. v. Free Ent. Ltd. (2001) 2 KLR (pt. 115) 521; (2001) 5 NWLR (Pt. 706) 426

APPEALS - Grounds of appeal - Competence of - Where they are incompetent - Effect on the additional ground - The additional ground will have no appeal to be anchored on (H3) Orakosim v. Menkiti (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 121) 1397; (2001) 9 NWLR (Pt. 719) 529

APPEALS - Grounds of appeal - If framed to contain particulars of error or misdirection complained of - Without setting them out in different headings - Is competent and is rightly entertained (H5) Glo


INDEX OF SUBJECT MATTER ALL SC 2001 DECISIONS

bal Trans. Oceanico S.A. v. Free Ent. Ltd. (2001) 2 KLR (pt. 115) 521; (2001) 5 NWLR (Pt. 706) 426

APPEALS - Grounds of appeal - If supported by sufficient facts - Enough to eliminate ambiguity - Should not be struck out due to technicalities (H1) Odonigi v. Oyeleke (2001) 2 KLR (pt. 116) 625; (2001) 6 NWLR (Pt. 708) 12

APPEALS - Grounds of appeal - In determining whether it alleges an error of law or fact - It is always relevant and crucial - To construe the ground together with its particulars (H1) P. N. Uddoh Trading Co. Ltd. v. Abere (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 122) 1713; (2001) 5 NWLR (Pt. 122) 1713

APPEALS - Grounds of appeal - Mixed law and fact - As no leave of court was obtained to appeal - The ground is incompetent - And should be struck out (H2) Abidoye v. Alawode (2001) 3 KLR (pt. 118) 917; (2001) 6 NWLR (Pt. 709) 463

APPEALS - Grounds of appeal - Mixed law and fact - Test for its determination (H1) Abidoye v. Alawode (2001) 3 KLR (pt. 118) 917; (2001) 6 NWLR (Pt. 709) 463

APPEALS - Grounds of appeal - Reason not forming part of the decision in a judgment - Cannot be relied on to challenge its validity (H8) Dongtoe v. Civil Service Commission Plateau State (2001) 4 KLR (pt. 120) 1239; (2001) 9 NWLR (Pt. 717) 132

APPEALS - Grounds of appeal - Procedure to be followed - In resolving an objection - On the issue of raising a question of mixed law and fact - Without the requisite leave (H2) Medical Tribunal v. Dr. Okonkwo (2001) 3 KLR (pt. 117) 739; (2001) 7 NWLR (Pt. 711) 206

APPEALS - Inconsistent findings - The trial court cannot blow hot and cold - In finding one thing and holding another (H7) Kayode v. Odutola (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 123) 1861; (2001) 11 NWLR (Pt. 725)


INDEX OF SUBJECT MATTER ALL SC 2001 DECISIONS

659

APPEALS - Interference - Bail - It would have been wrong for the Court of Appeal to interfere with the discretion of the learned trial judge in refusing bail - To the appellant (H6) Bamaiyi v. State (2001) 4 KLR (pt. 119) 1043; (2001) 8 NWLR (Pt. 715) 270

APPEALS - Interference - Findings of trial court - Ought not to have been interfered with by the Court of Appeal - In the absence of cogent reasons (H7) Kyari v. Alkali (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 123) 1753; (2001) 11 NWLR (Pt. 724) 412

APPEALS - Interlocutory appeals - An appellate court - Should not express its entire mind - On the merits of a matter - In which it is not going to make a final decision (H3) Seven UP Ltd. v. Abiola & Sons Ltd. (2001) 6 KLR (pt. 124) 2017; (2001) 13 NWLR (Pt. 730) 469

APPEALS - Interlocutory applications - Extension of time to appeal and leave to appeal - Conditions precedent to granting the order - The applicant has given good and substantial reasons for the delay - Thus fulfilling one of the conditions (H2) CBN v. Ahmed (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 123) 1897; (2001) 11 NWLR (Pt. 724) 369

APPEALS - Interlocutory applications - Leave to appeal - The courts duty in considering the grounds of appeal - Proposed in support of the appeal - Is limited to whether the grounds are substantial and reveal arguable grounds - And not the merit of such grounds (H3) CBN v. Ahmed (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 123) 1897; (2001) 11 NWLR (Pt. 724) 369

APPEALS - Interlocutory applications - Stay of proceedings - Appellate courts should not deal with the merits of the substantive suit - In the interlocutory application (H3) United Spinners Ltd. v. Chartered Bank Ltd. (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 127) 2745; (2001) 14 NWLR (Pt. 732) 195

APPEALS - Interlocutory injunction - Balance of convenience in the


INDEX OF SUBJECT MATTER ALL SC 2001 DECISIONS

present case - Lies with the applicant - And it is therefore entitled to the order of injunction sought (H4) CBN v. Ahmed (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 123) 1897; (2001) 11 NWLR (Pt. 724) 369

APPEALS - Irregular procedure - If consented to by the defendant at trial - Cannot be complained against on appeal - By the said defendant (H4) IBWA v. Imano Ltd. (2001) 3 KLR (pt. 118) 873

APPEALS - Issue for determination - An issue that was not raised in the grounds of appeal - Is incompetent (H13) Achiakpa v. Nduka (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 126) 2487; (2001) 14 NWLR (Pt. 734) 623

APPEALS - Issue - Not raised in a matter - Governor's right to sue for private wrong - Not arising for decision in this case - Will not be pronounced upon (H3) Tinubu v. I.M.B. Securities Ltd. (2001) 9/10 KLR (pt. 129) 3087; (2001) 16 NWLR (Pt. 740) 670

APPEALS - Issue that is crucial - Identity of land - Once the crucial issue of identity has failed - Plaintiff cannot succeed in his case - Even if other issues are decided in his favour (H3) Ibhafidon v. Igbinosun (2001) 4 KLR (pt. 120) 1167; (2001) 8 NWLR (Pt. 716) 653

APPEALS - Issue - Where already discussed - The court will not consider it separately again (H8) Ogunsina v. Matanmi (2001) 4 KLR (pt. 119) 1007; (2001) 9 NWLR (Pt. 718) 286

APPEALS - Issue - Which does not relate to any of the grounds of appeal - Such issue is cannot be argued and is incompetent (H5) Odu v. State (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 122) 1551; (2001) 10 NWLR (Pt. 722) 668

APPEALS - Issue - Which was not raised at lower court - And for which no leave was sought - Before it was formulated - Is incompetent and is struck out (H7) Babatola v. Aladejana (2001) 6 KLR (pt. 124) 2141; (2001) 12 NWLR (Pt. 728) 597

APPEALS - Issues - Amounting to academic exercise - Will not be


INDEX OF SUBJECT MATTER ALL SC 2001 DECISIONS

entertained by the court as in this case (H7) Global Trans. Oceanico S.A. v. Free Ent. Ltd. (2001) 2 KLR (pt. 115) 521; (2001) 5 NWLR (Pt. 706) 426

APPEALS - Issues - Any issue not covered by the grounds of appeal - Is incompetent and will be struck out (H17) Achiakpa v. Nduka (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 126) 2487; (2001) 14 NWLR (Pt. 734) 623

APPEALS - Issues - Consideration of - Failure to consider vital issues set out for determination - Amounts to breach of right to fair hearing (H3) Oke v. Nwaogbuinya (2001) 1 KLR (pt. 114) 169

APPEALS - Issues - Court should pronounce on all material issues raised - The Court of Appeal defaulting on that would depend on the facts and circumstances of each case (H1) Bamaiyi v. State (2001) 4 KLR (pt. 119) 1043; (2001) 8 NWLR (Pt. 715) 270

APPEALS - Issues - Defences raised - Which are not contained in the issues for determination - Will not be considered (H3) Akpan v. State (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 127) 2767; (2001) 15 NWLR (Pt. 737) 745

APPEALS - Issues - Duty to consider - Appellate court need not consider all the issues posed - If consideration of one can dispose of the appeal (H1) Seven UP Ltd. v. Abiola & Sons Ltd. (2001) 6 KLR (pt. 124) 2017; (2001) 13 NWLR (Pt. 730) 469

APPEALS - Issues - Error of court - Issues not arising - The courts below fell into error - To have insisted on the proof of an issue - Which did not arise before the court (H2) Adeniran v. Alao (2001) 12 KLR (pt. 131) 3669; (2001) 18 NWLR (Pt. 745) 361

APPEALS - Issues - Error - Though the lower court misunderstood the issues - As tried by the tribunal - No miscarriage of justice was occasioned (H8) Medical Tribunal v. Dr. Okonkwo (2001) 3 KLR (pt. 117) 739; (2001) 7 NWLR (Pt. 711) 206

APPEALS - Issues - Essence of the formulation of issues - Is to distil


INDEX OF SUBJECT MATTER ALL SC 2001 DECISIONS

the points of law or fact in the grounds of appeal filed (H1) Igunbor v. Afolabi (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 121) 152; (2001) 11 NWLR (Pt. 723) 148

APPEALS - Issues - Failure to consider all material issues - May not occasion a miscarriage of justice (H2) Bamaiyi v. State (2001) 4 KLR (pt. 119) 1043; (2001) 8 NWLR (Pt. 715) 270

APPEALS - Issues for determination - Failure to consider an issue - Did not occasion a miscarriage of justice (H2) Bamaiyi v. State (2001) 4 KLR (pt. 119) 1043; (2001) 8 NWLR (Pt. 715) 270

APPEALS - Issues - Must be based on the grounds of appeal - Filed by the parties (H1) Adah v. Adah (2001) 2 KLR (pt. 115) 491; (2001) 5 NWLR (Pt. 705) 1

APPEALS - Issues - Must be based on the grounds of appeal filed - And in the absence of such grounds - The issues cannot be considered - By the court (H2) Akpan v. State (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 127) 2767; (2001) 15 NWLR (Pt. 737) 745

APPEALS - Issues - Resolution of - Failure of Court of Appeal to resolve relevant issues - Supreme Court will not deliberate upon them - But remit the appeal back to that Court (H4) Oke v. Nwaogbuinya (2001) 1 KLR (pt. 114) 169

APPEALS - Issues - Should be hinged on the grounds of appeal - Or they are incompetent and will be struck out (H7) Chime v. Chime (2001) 1 KLR (pt. 114) 269; (2001) 3 NWLR (Pt. 701) 527

APPEALS - Issues - Suo motu raising of issues - Did not arise in this case - Court of Appeal merely pronounced its own view - On the issue fully argued by the parties (H1) Tinubu v. I.M.B. Securities Ltd. (2001) 9/10 KLR (pt. 129) 3087; (2001) 16 NWLR (Pt. 740) 670

APPEALS - Issues - Terseness leading to obscurity of the issues for determination - Will not be encouraged (H3) Igunbor v. Afolabi (2001)


INDEX OF SUBJECT MATTER ALL SC 2001 DECISIONS

5 KLR (pt. 121) 152; (2001) 11 NWLR (Pt. 723) 148

APPEALS - Issues - The issue complained of - Was properly considered - And pronounced on - By the lower court (H1) Adeleke v. Iyanda (2001) 6 KLR (pt. 124) 1973; (2001) 13 NWLR (Pt. 729) 1

APPEALS - Issues - Unrelated to the ground of appeal filed - Are irrelevant (H2) Igunbor v. Afolabi (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 121) 152; (2001) 11 NWLR (Pt. 723) 148

APPEALS - Judgment - As the judgment is lost - Due to fault of a trial court - The court of appeal was wrong - In making it impossible for the appeal to be heard - And must hear the appeal on all lawful grounds of appeal (H3) First Bank v. May Medical Clinics (2001) 4 KLR (pt. 120) 1023; (2001) 9 NWLR (Pt. 717) 28

APPEALS - Judgment - Conclusion of a trial court - Which was not appealed against in the Court of Appeal - The Supreme Court cannot pronounce on it (H6) Biariko v. Edeh-Ogwuile (2001) 4 KLR (pt. 120) 1213; (2001) 12 NWLR (Pt. 726) 235

APPEALS - Judgment - Decision - Based on an erroneous premises - On a matter that goes to the root of the controversy - Cannot be allowed to stand (H2) Bank of the North v. Yau (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 122) 1561; (2001) 10 NWLR (Pt. 721) 408

APPEALS - Judgment - Errors - Only substantial errors - That occasion miscarriage of justice - Will warrant interference by appellate court (H6) Abimbola v. Abatan (2001) 4 KLR (pt. 120) 1149; (2001) 9 NWLR (Pt. 717) 66

APPEALS - Judgment - Finding not appealed against - Is deemed correct until the contrary is shown (H7) Biariko v. Edeh-Ogwuile (2001) 4 KLR (pt. 120) 1213; (2001) 12 NWLR (Pt. 726) 235

APPEALS - Judgment - Findings - Supported by evidence - The court of Appeal was right to have affirmed the findings (H5) Ekpe v. Oke


INDEX OF SUBJECT MATTER ALL SC 2001 DECISIONS

(2001) 5 KLR (pt. 121) 1505; (2001) 10 NWLR (Pt. 721) 341

APPEALS - Judgment - Hearsay evidence - Conviction based on hearsay evidence - Appellate court may quash such conviction - In the absence of other evidence (H4) Ijioffor v. State (2001) 4 KLR (pt. 120) 1345; (2001) 9 NWLR (Pt. 718) 371

APPEALS - Judgment - Issue - Conclusive determination of - A decision is conclusive as to what it determines - When it can only be set aside on an appeal being brought for that purpose (H1) MILAD Benue State v. Ulegede (2001) 9/10 KLR (pt. 129) 3135; (2001) 17 NWLR (Pt. 741) 194

APPEALS - Judgment - Issue - Reopening - Issue that has been conclusively settled by a judgment - Cannot be reopened (H3) MILAD Benue State v. Ulegede (2001) 9/10 KLR (pt. 129) 3135; (2001) 17 NWLR (Pt. 741) 194

APPEALS - Judgment - Slip - Which has not occasioned a miscarriage of justice - Cannot result in the appeal being allowed (H1) Ekpe v. Oke (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 121) 1505; (2001) 10 NWLR (Pt. 721) 341

APPEALS - Judgments - Error - Appellate court - inherent power - To correct judgment - There is such power in the Supreme Court to correct its judgment or that of the lower court - In order to avert mischief (H1) Bank of the North v. Yau (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 122) 1561; (2001) 10 NWLR (Pt. 721) 408

APPEALS - Judgments - Review of Court's judgment - Cannot be done by that court - Towards varying the judgment - Only clerical mistake or accidental slip can be corrected - Order 5 r. 3 Court of Appeal Rules (H5) Onuaguluchi v. Ndu (2001) 3 KLR (pt. 117) 831; (2001) 7 NWLR (Pt. 712) 309

APPEALS - Jurisdiction - Issue of jurisdiction - When it can be raised - The issue of jurisdiction can be raised at any stage of any proceed


INDEX OF SUBJECT MATTER ALL SC 2001 DECISIONS

ings - Even in an appeal before the Supreme Court (H1) Isaiah v. Shell Petroleum Ltd. (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 122) 1631; (2001) 11 NWLR (Pt. 723) 168

APPEALS - Jurisdiction - Non compliance with order of Court - As regards payment of judgment debt - Does not divest court of jurisdiction to determine appeal (H1) Sea Trucks Ltd. v. Anigboro (2001) 1 KLR (pt. 114) 137; (2001) 2 NWLR (Pt. 696) 159

APPEALS - Jurisdiction - Once the appeal is determined - Based on a preliminary issue formulated by the court or the parties - Any other discourse on other issues or on merits of the appeal - Is without jurisdiction and incompetent (H1) Gov. of Kogi State v. Yakubu (2001) 3 KLR (pt. 118) 903; (2001) 6 NWLR (Pt. 710) 521

APPEALS - Jurisdiction - Tribunals - Medical Practitioners Disciplinary Tribunal - As the count complained of did not imply any criminal offence - The court below rightly denied jurisdiction (H5) Medical Tribunal v. Dr. Okonkwo (2001) 3 KLR (pt. 117) 739; (2001) 7 NWLR (Pt. 711) 206

APPEALS - Leave - Interlocutory order or ruling - Appeal thereon - Must be brought within time stipulated by s. 25 (2)(a) Court of Appeal Act - Or else leave of court should be obtained (H1) Oke v. Nwaogbuinya (2001) 1 KLR (pt. 114) 169

APPEALS - Leave - Issue - Fresh issue - When an issue not raised in the Court below - Is sought to be raised as a fresh point in the Supreme Court - Leave to do so must be sought and obtained (H3) Rockonoh Property Ltd. v. NITEL Plc. (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 128) 2871; (2001) 14 NWLR (Pt. 733) 468

APPEALS - Leave - Supreme Court - Fresh issues - If raised without the leave of the court - Will not be considered (H2) Global Trans. Oceanico S.A. v. Free Ent. Ltd. (2001) 2 KLR (pt. 115) 521; (2001) 5 NWLR (Pt. 706) 426


INDEX OF SUBJECT MATTER ALL SC 2001 DECISIONS

APPEALS - Leave - To raise a new issue - Where fresh evidence will be required - Leave will not be granted (H3) Ejuetami v. Olaiya (2001) 12 KLR (pt. 130) 3483; (2001) 18 NWLR (Pt. 746) 572

APPEALS - Notice - Defective notice of appeal - Without any competent or valid ground of appeal - Cannot be cured by filing amended grounds out of time - And the appeal should be struck out (H4) Global Trans. Oceanico S.A. v. Free Ent. Ltd. (2001) 2 KLR (pt. 115) 521; (2001) 5 NWLR (Pt. 706) 426

APPEALS - Notice of appeal - Incorporating grounds of appeal - Must have been filed at the High Court - In conformity with the Rules of Court - For an appellant to be heard (H1) Korede v. Adedokun (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 128) 2829; (2001) 15 NWLR (Pt. 736) 483

APPEALS - Obiter dictum - The issue decided on - By the lower court - Was obiter - As it was not raised by the parties - And does not affect the final decision of the court (H1) Jack v.

APPEALS - Order - Immunity - Governors' Immunity s. 308(1)(a) 1999 Constitution - Where court of Appeal rightly disallowed this appeal - Proper order is to strike it out - And not sine die adjournment (H5) Tinubu v. I.M.B. Securities Ltd. (2001) 9/10 KLR (pt. 129) 3087; (2001) 16 NWLR (Pt. 740) 670

APPEALS - Order - Whether interlocutory or final - How to determine its nature (H9) Igunbor v. Afolabi (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 121) 152; (2001) 11 NWLR (Pt. 723) 148

APPEALS - Pleadings - Amendment - Appellate court should not use its discretion - To give approval for an amendment - Prompted by the findings of trial court - In favour of one party (H5) Kode v. Yussuf (2001) 2 KLR (pt. 115) 457; (2001) 4 NWLR (Pt. 703) 392

APPEALS - Pleadings - Amendment - Which is designed to overreach - By making a ground of appeal useless - Constitutes an abuse of process of court - And ought to be dismissed (H4) Kode v. Yussuf


INDEX OF SUBJECT MATTER ALL SC 2001 DECISIONS

(2001) 2 KLR (pt. 115) 457; (2001) 4 NWLR (Pt. 703) 392

APPEALS - Pleadings - Amendment sought on appeal - Is incompetent - As it will require defendant - To amend his statement of defence - And lead new evidence thereon - Giving the case a completely different complexion (H7) Kode v. Yussuf (2001) 2 KLR (pt. 115) 457; (2001) 4 NWLR (Pt. 703) 392

APPEALS - Pleadings - Joinder of issues - The lower courts - Were in error - To have held that issue of title - Did not arise for determination - When issues had been joined in the pleadings - On that point (H3) Nwadiogbu v. Nnadozie (2001) 6 KLR (pt. 124) 2081; (2001) 12 NWLR (Pt. 727) 315

APPEALS - Pleadings - Reliefs sought - Where they are claimed per writ of summons - And defendant fails to object to the irregularity before pleading to it - And there is no miscarriage of justice - The issue cannot be raised on appeal (H5) Ajayi v. Jolayemi (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 122) 1689; (2001) 10 NWLR (Pt. 722) 516

APPEALS - Preliminary objection - Abuse of court processes - Where a party exercises his constitutional right to appeal - Even if he had applied for extension of time - To comply with the same court order - His conduct does not amount to abuse of court process (H1) CBN v. Ahmed (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 123) 1897; (2001) 11 NWLR (Pt. 724) 369

APPEALS - Preliminary objection - Against grounds of appeal - Are misconceived - And cannot nullify the grounds - Complained of (H2) Incar Nig. Plc v. Bolex Enterprises (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 123) 1823; (2001) 12 NWLR (Pt. 728) 646; (2001) 12 NWLR (Pt. 728) 646

APPEALS - Preliminary objection - New issues - If raised without leave of the court - Is incompetent and will be struck out (H1) Incar Nig. Plc v. Bolex Enterprises (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 123) 1823; (2001) 12 NWLR (Pt. 728) 646; (2001) 12 NWLR (Pt. 728) 646


INDEX OF SUBJECT MATTER ALL SC 2001 DECISIONS

APPEALS - Preliminary objection - Raised against the grounds of appeal - Are untenable - As they do not offend the Rules of the Court (H3) Ajayi v. Jolayemi (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 122) 1689; (2001) 10 NWLR (Pt. 722) 516

APPEALS - Practice & procedure - Error - Evaluation of evidence - The trial judge corrected the error - In the first part of his judgment - By further evaluating all the evidence - Before dismissing the claim finally - And so occasioned no miscarriage of justice (H2) Jekpe v. Alokwe (2001) 4 KLR (pt. 120) 985; (2001) 8 NWLR (Pt. 715) 252

APPEALS - Practice & procedure - Error of trial - Where the trial judge dismissed plaintiff's entire claim - Without evaluating evidence - He was in error - And retrial would have been ordered - If he had closed his judgment at that stage (H1) Jekpe v. Alokwe (2001) 4 KLR (pt. 120) 985; (2001) 8 NWLR (Pt. 715) 252

APPEALS - Rape - Acquittal - The contradictions in this case - Are not sufficient by themselves - To entitle the appellant to an acquittal - As they are not material (H4) Iko v. State (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 126) 2419; (2001) 14 NWLR (Pt. 732) 221

APPEALS - Reevaluation of evidence and findings - Was validly done by the Court of Appeal - In exercise of its powers - Having observed the relevant criteria (H6) Nteogwuile v. Otuo (2001) 6 KLR (pt. 125) 2205; (2001) 16 NWLR (Pt. 738) 58

APPEALS - Reliefs sought before court of Appeal - Must not be granted - The court is free to grant any other appropriate reliefs (H1) Onuaguluchi v. Ndu (2001) 3 KLR (pt. 117) 831; (2001) 7 NWLR (Pt. 712) 309

APPEALS - Remark by court - A mere passing remark - Should not be appealable - But should be ignored (H1) Boothia Inc. v. Fareast Ltd. (2001) 4 KLR (pt. 119) 1107; (2001) 9 NWLR (Pt. 719) 572

APPEALS - Retrial - Civil case - Conditions under which an appellate


INDEX OF SUBJECT MATTER ALL SC 2001 DECISIONS

court may order a retrial in a civil case (H6) Eke v. Okwaranyia (2001) 4 KLR (pt. 120) 1181; (2001) 12 NWLR (Pt. 726) 181

APPEALS - Retrial - Error of trial court - Occasioned a miscarriage of justice - And the judgment was properly set aside - And retrial ordered (H2) Oyefolu v. Durosinmi (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 128) 2997; (2001) 16 NWLR (Pt. 738) 1

APPEALS - Retrial - Failure of case - When a plaintiff's case has failed - A retrial order is inappropriate (H7) Eke v. Okwaranyia (2001) 4 KLR (pt. 120) 1181; (2001) 12 NWLR (Pt. 726) 181

APPEALS - Retrial - Failure of plaintiff's claim - Retrial is erroneous - As paramount consideration is to see justice done (H8) Duru v. Onwumelu (2001) 12 KLR (pt. 130) 3287; (2001) 18 NWLR (Pt. 746) 672

APPEALS - Retrial - Was properly ordered by Appeal court - As trial court did not advert itself to all issues by it (H1) Nnorodim v. Ezeani (2001) 2 KLR (pt. 116) 583; (2001) 5 NWLR (Pt. 706) 203

APPEALS - Retrial - Will be ordered - When there has been an error in law - Or a vital irregularity in procedure - But not in this case (H15) Achiakpa v. Nduka (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 126) 2487; (2001) 14 NWLR (Pt. 734) 623

APPEALS - Retrial - Will not be ordered - Despite judge's unwarranted remark - As it did not affect his proper handling of the case (H7) Odonigi v. Oyeleke (2001) 2 KLR (pt. 116) 625; (2001) 6 NWLR (Pt. 708) 12

APPEALS - Reversal - Fair hearing - Any judgment or ruling - Based on breach of constitutional provision of fair hearing - Will not be allowed to stand on appeal (H3) Ogundoyin v. Adeyemi (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 127) 2687; (2001) 13 NWLR (Pt. 730) 403

APPEALS - Reversal - Murder - Identification Evidence - Despite the


INDEX OF SUBJECT MATTER ALL SC 2001 DECISIONS

discountenanced evidence - Other evidence exist to identify the appellant - As participating in the murder - Therefore the error of the lower court - Cannot lead to reversal of the conviction (H2) Udoebre v. State (2001) 6 KLR (pt. 124) 1945; (2001) 12 NWLR (Pt. 728) 617

APPEALS - Reversal - Where the decision of the lower court - Is not based on the credibility of witnesses - Appeal court has a duty to reverse it - If it is satisfied that the decision was wrong (H3) Nteogwuile v. Otuo (2001) 6 KLR (pt. 125) 2205; (2001) 16 NWLR (Pt. 738) 58

APPEALS - Reversal - Wrongful admission s. 227(1) EA - Murder - Expunging Exhibit A that was wrongfully admitted - Will not ground a reversal - As miscarriage of justice was not occasioned (H4) Olalekan v. State (2001) 12 KLR (pt. 130) 3401; (2001) 18 NWLR (Pt. 746) 793

APPEALS - Review and evaluation of evidence - Distinction between the two - The duty was properly discharged by trial court (H6) Abidoye v. Alawode (2001) 3 KLR (pt. 118) 917; (2001) 6 NWLR (Pt. 709) 463

APPEALS - Right of appeal - As the consent judgment of the trial court - Did not bind the appellants - And they were not parties thereto - Their appeal was incompetent and should be struck out (H3) Ogunkunle v. Cherubim & Seraphim (2001) 6 KLR (pt. 124) 2115; (2001) 12 NWLR (Pt. 727) 359

APPEALS - Right of appeal - Under s.222 (a) 1979 Constitution - Condition precedent - Person claiming such a right - Must show that the court's decision is against him or his interest (H1) Ogunkunle v. Cherubim & Seraphim (2001) 6 KLR (pt. 124) 2115; (2001) 12 NWLR (Pt. 727) 359

APPEALS - Specific findings - That was not challenged - Cannot be appealed against (H6) Ojo v. Azama (2001) 1 KLR (pt. 113) 81;


INDEX OF SUBJECT MATTER ALL SC 2001 DECISIONS

(2001) 4 NWLR (Pt. 702) 57

APPEALS - Submissions - Every complaint or submission of appellants - Should be backed up by specific facts - To enable the court fairly decide on them (H15) Udoebre v. State (2001) 6 KLR (pt. 124) 1945; (2001) 12 NWLR (Pt. 728) 617

APPEALS - Substitution - The applicants will fail - If they have not shown that they are the persons entitled to be substituted (H2) Osagunna v. Gov. Ekiti State (2001) 4 KLR (pt. 119) 1081

APPEALS - Suo motu issue - Fair hearing - Failure to hear the defendants on the suo motu issue - Amounted to a denial of fair hearing (H20) Achiakpa v. Nduka (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 126) 2487; (2001) 14 NWLR (Pt. 734) 623

APPEALS - Suo motu issue - If raised by the court - The parties must be given an opportunity to be heard (H19) Achiakpa v. Nduka (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 126) 2487; (2001) 14 NWLR (Pt. 734) 623

APPEALS - Suo motu issues - May be raised by the court - But court must not base its decision thereon - Without inviting the parties to address it on such issues (H1) Hambe v. Hueze (2001) 2 KLR (pt. 115) 437; (2001) 4 NWLR (Pt. 703) 372

APPEALS - Suo motu issues - Must not be raised by the court - And resolved without hearing the parties (H5) Abimbola v. Abatan (2001) 4 KLR (pt. 120) 1149; (2001) 9 NWLR (Pt. 717) 66

APPEALS - Suo motu issues - Where court takes up points suo motu - Parties must be given opportunity to address the court - Before decision is made on the points (H3) Korede v. Adedokun (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 128) 2829; (2001) 15 NWLR (Pt. 736) 483

APPEALS - Technicalities - Court has shifted - From undue reliance on technicalities - To doing substantial justice - Between the parties before it (H2) Odonigi v. Oyeleke (2001) 2 KLR (pt. 116) 625; (2001)


INDEX OF SUBJECT MATTER ALL SC 2001 DECISIONS

6 NWLR (Pt. 708) 12

APPEALS - Tribunal - Its decision was not a nullity - As held by lower court - Because the defect in the charge was a mere irregularity - That did not occasion miscarriage of justice (H7) Medical Tribunal v. Dr. Okonkwo (2001) 3 KLR (pt. 117) 739; (2001) 7 NWLR (Pt. 711) 206

ARBITRATION - Arbitrators award - Interest awarded by trial court - On the award - Was without jurisdiction (H5) Ras Pal Gazi Constr. Co. Ltd. v. F.C.D.A. (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 122) 1651; (2001) 10 NWLR (Pt. 722) 559

ARBITRATION - Conversion to courts judgment - The court has no jurisdiction - To convert the award into its judgment - Rather it will enter it as a judgment - And give effect to it - In the absence of a challenge (H3) Ras Pal Gazi Constr. Co. Ltd. v. F.C.D.A. (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 122) 1651; (2001) 10 NWLR (Pt. 722) 559

ARBITRATION - Customary arbitration - Conditions for a valid customary arbitration - Were not fulfilled in this case (H4) Odonigi v. Oyeleke (2001) 2 KLR (pt. 116) 625; (2001) 6 NWLR (Pt. 708) 12

ARBITRATION - Customary arbitration - Submission to arbitration - Where a party submitted to arbitration - He is bound of the result of he arbitration (H2) Ekpe v. Oke (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 121) 1505; (2001) 10 NWLR (Pt. 721) 341

ARBITRATION - Customary arbitration - Validity of - Ingredients that must be pleaded and proved (H5) Eke v. Okwaranyia (2001) 4 KLR (pt. 120) 1181; (2001) 12 NWLR (Pt. 726) 181

ARBITRATION - Estoppel - Customary arbitration are recognized as judicial proceedings - Capable of creating estoppel per rem judicatam - If some conditions are satisfied (H3) Odonigi v. Oyeleke (2001) 2 KLR (pt. 116) 625; (2001) 6 NWLR (Pt. 708) 12


INDEX OF SUBJECT MATTER ALL SC 2001 DECISIONS

ARBITRATION - Judgment - Arbitrators award - Once filed in court - Has the force and effect of a judgment (H1) Ras Pal Gazi Constr. Co. Ltd. v. F.C.D.A. (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 122) 1651; (2001) 10 NWLR (Pt. 722) 559

ARBITRATION - Jurisdiction of court - Is to give leave to enforce the award as a judgment - And not to tamper with it in any other way (H4) Ras Pal Gazi Constr. Co. Ltd. v. F.C.D.A. (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 122) 1651; (2001) 10 NWLR (Pt. 722) 559

ARBITRATION - Settlement out of court - Differs from an arbitrators award - Because the award immediately becomes binding on the parties - And can be enforced by the court on application (H2) Ras Pal Gazi Constr. Co. Ltd. v. F.C.D.A. (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 122) 1651; (2001) 10 NWLR (Pt. 722) 559

BAIL - Discretion - It would have been wrong for the Court of Appeal to interfere with the discretion of the learned trial judge in refusing bail - To the appellant (H6) Bamaiyi v. State (2001) 4 KLR (pt.119) 1043; (2001) 8 NWLR (Pt. 715) 270

BAILMENT - Pawn or pledge - Validity - It is void if the pawnor has no authority from the owner - And therefore cannot hold it against the owner (H2) Labode v. Otubu (2001) 3 KLR (pt. 117) 699; (2001) 7 NWLR (Pt. 712) 256

BANKING - Bank ledger - Admissibility - Secondary evidence - Of entries in bank ledger - Will be admitted upon substantial compliance with S.972(e) Evidence Act (H4) Narindex Ltd. v. Inter-Continental Bank (2001) 4 KLR (pt. 120) 1321; (2001) 10 NWLR (Pt. 721) 321

BANKING - Bill - Notice of dishonour - Reasonable time - A delay in giving notice extending for a period of nearly one year - Without any satisfactory explanation - Is unreasonable (H3) Bank of the North v. Yau (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 122) 1561; (2001) 10 NWLR (Pt. 721) 408

BANKING - Credit facilities - Interest rate - Changes from time to


INDEX OF SUBJECT MATTER ALL SC 2001 DECISIONS

time - So that upward review of prime lending rate in this case is proper (H5) Narindex Ltd. v. Inter-Continental Bank (2001) 4 KLR (pt. 120) 1321; (2001) 10 NWLR (Pt. 721) 321

BANKING - Devaluation - Effect of devaluation of foreign currency on transaction - Onus of proof - Is on the bank to show the effect of such devaluation - And that the bank is entitled to charge the customer with the devaluation (H2) Union Bank Plc. v. Emole (2001) 12 KLR (pt. 131) 3559; (2001) 18 NWLR (Pt. 745) 501

BANKING - Master & servant - Criminal law - Banking malpractices irregularities and dishonest practices - Of which appellant was guilty - Does not constitute any offence known to our criminal law (H3) Olarewaju v. Afribank Nig. Plc. (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 126) 2395; (2001) 13 NWLR (Pt. 731) 691

BILL OF LADING - Passing of property in the goods - Cannot be presumed by the agent - Cannot divest the plaintiff of the right to sue - For loss of some of the goods (H4) Boothia Inc. v. Farest Ltd. (2001) 4 KLR (pt. 119) 1107; (2001) 9 NWLR (Pt. 719) 572

BUSINESS NAMES - Action - A person carrying on business in a name or style other than his own name - May be sued in such name or style - But cannot sue in his trade name (H3) Iyke Medical Merchandise v. Pfizer Inc. (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 121) 1377; (2001) 10 NWLR (Pt. 722) 540

BUSINESS NAMES - Action - Parties - Persons who conceal their names - Can be sued in the name in which they carry on business (H6) Iyke Medical Merchandise v. Pfizer Inc. (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 121) 1377; (2001) 10 NWLR (Pt. 722) 540

CHIEFTAINCY MATTERS - Cause of action - Traditional Rulers and Chiefs Edict of 1979 (Bendel State) - The cause of action - Did not accrue until appointments were made - In accordance with the Edict (H3) Ikine v. Edjerode (2001) 12 KLR (pt. 131) 3711; (2001) 18 NWLR (Pt. 745) 446


INDEX OF SUBJECT MATTER ALL SC 2001 DECISIONS

CHIEFTAINCY MATTERS - Chieftaincy declaration - Error of trial court - The trial court was in error - To go outside the declaration - And invoke a principle not provided therein (H5) Oyefolu v. Durosinmi (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 128) 2997; (2001) 16 NWLR (Pt. 738) 1

CHIEFTAINCY MATTERS - Chieftaincy declaration - Error of trial court - The finding of the trial court - As to membership of Iga Osolu ruling House - Is contrary to the Chieftaincy declaration - And is a fundamental error (H6) Oyefolu v. Durosinmi (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 128) 2997; (2001) 16 NWLR (Pt. 738) 1

CHIEFTAINCY MATTERS - Commencement of action - Plaintiffs could not have commenced action when the Edict was promulgated in 1979 - But when the appointment of 1st appellant was made in 1985 (H4) Ikine v. Edjerode (2001) 12 KLR (pt. 131) 3711; (2001) 18 NWLR (Pt. 745) 446

CHIEFTAINCY MATTERS - Conflicting traditional evidence - Kojo II v. Bonsie principle - Is not limited to ownership of land - But applies to other claims like chieftaincy dispute (H6) Olatunde v. Abidogun (2001) 12 KLR (pt. 131) 3653; (2001) 18 NWLR (Pt. 746) 712

CHIEFTAINCY MATTERS - Courts - Justiciability - Traditional Rulers and Chiefs Edict - Present action is justiciable as the jurisdiction of the court - Has not been ousted by the Edict (H6) Ikine v. Edjerode (2001) 12 KLR (pt. 131) 3711; (2001) 18 NWLR (Pt. 745) 446

CHIEFTAINCY MATTERS - Right to sue - Judicial precedent - Uwegba's case - Decided that Governor is to set up an inquiry - Before coming to a decision under s.22(6) (b) of Bendel State Chieftaincy Law (H2) Abu v. Odugbo (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 126) 2299; (2001) 14 NWLR (Pt. 732) 45

CHIEFTAINCY MATTERS - Statutes - S. 15 Kwara State Chiefs Edict No. 3 of 1998 - Does not apply - Where the issue is the appointment of a member of a Traditional Council - As in this case (H1) Ajayi v.


INDEX OF SUBJECT MATTER ALL SC 2001 DECISIONS

Jolayemi (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 122) 1689; (2001) 10 NWLR (Pt. 722) 516

CLAIMS - Appeals - Reliefs sought before Court of Appeal - Must not be granted - The court is free to grant any other appropriate relief (H1) Onuaguluchi v. Ndu (2001) 3 KLR (pt. 117) 831; (2001) 7 NWLR (Pt. 712) 309

CLAIMS - Counter claim - Dismissal of - In the circumstances of the case - Based on the evidence and applicable law - The Court of Appeal was wrong in dismissing the appellant's counter claim (H13) Kyari v. Alkali (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 123) 1753; (2001) 11 NWLR (Pt. 724) 412

CLAIMS - Death of a plaintiff - Application for substitution of such plaintiff - Depends on whether the claim survives the plaintiff (H1) Osagunna v. Gov. Ekiti State (2001) 4 KLR (pt. 119) 1081

CLAIMS - Departure from endorsed claim - Gives rise to new cause of action - For which the court's jurisdiction has not been invoked (H2) Adenuga v. Odumeru (2001) 1 KLR (pt. 114) 197; (2001) 2 NWLR (Pt. 696) 184

CLAIMS - Reliefs not claimed - Where gratuitously made are incompetent and will be set aside - But will not affect courts judgment - As it is consequential to the judgment (H3) Adeye v. Adesanya (2001) 2 KLR (pt. 116) 595; (2001) 6 NWLR (Pt. 708) 1

CLAIMS - Reliefs - Since they are not related to a claim before the court - Court is incompetent and has no jurisdiction to hear it (H5) Adenuga v. Odumeru (2001) 1 KLR (pt. 114) 197; (2001) 2 NWLR (Pt. 696) 184

CLAIMS - Reliefs sought must be within the scope of the claim - As plaintiff is limited by his claim (H1) Adenuga v. Odumeru (2001) 1 KLR (pt. 114) 197; (2001) 2 NWLR (Pt. 696) 184


INDEX OF SUBJECT MATTER ALL SC 2001 DECISIONS

CLAIMS - Statement of claim - Defect - Where a party claims as per writ of summons - The statement of claim is not defective thereby (H7) Okomu Oil Ltd. v. Iserhienrhien (2001) 3 KLR (pt. 117) 797; (2001) 6 NWLR (Pt. 710) 660

COMPANY LAW - Accounts - Ownership of business - Where clear evidence abound - Ownership of the block making business belongs to the respondent - And appellant must render account of the business (H5) Nsirim v. Onuma Construction Co. Ltd. (2001) 3 KLR (pt. 118) 853; (2001) 7 NWLR (Pt. 713) 742

COMPANY LAW - Meetings of the company - Minutes thereof - Absence of minutes - Does not render the meeting void - It only attracts a penalty (H1) Nsirim v. Onuma Construction Co. Ltd. (2001) 3 KLR (pt. 118) 853; (2001) 7 NWLR (Pt. 713) 742

COMPANY LAW - Pleadings - Company meeting minutes - As the issue was not pleaded - But merely arose in cross examination - It goes to no issue (H3) Nsirim v. Onuma Construction Co. Ltd. (2001) 3 KLR (pt. 118) 853; (2001) 7 NWLR (Pt. 713) 742

CONFLICT OF LAWS - Right to sue - Conflict between a state law and s. 236(1) of the 1979 Constitution - Will render the state law void for inconsistency (H1) Abu v. Odugbo (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 126) 2299; (2001) 14 NWLR (Pt. 732) 45

CONSTITUTIONAL LAW - Administrative body - Disciplinary action - Commission of offence - Admission of guilt - Jurisdiction of the court - An administrative body which acts on the admission of guilt by the accused - Has not usurped the constitutional jurisdiction of the court (H 6) Dongtoe v. Civil Service Commission Plateau State (2001) 4 KLR (pt. 120) 1239; (2001) 9 NWLR (Pt. 717) 132

CONSTITUTION LAW - Applicable constitution - It is the 1979 Constitution not the 1963 Constitution - That applies to a cause of action accruing in 1985 (H5) Ikine v. Edjerode (2001) 12 KLR (pt. 131) 3711; (2001) 18 NWLR (Pt. 745) 446


INDEX OF SUBJECT MATTER ALL SC 2001 DECISIONS

CONSTITUTIONAL LAW - Case stated - Questions referred to the Court of Appeal - S. 295(2)1999 Constitution - It is not mandatory for the court of Appeal to answer every such question (H1) Bamaiyi v. A-G Fed. (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 128) 2939; (2001) 12 NWLR (Pt. 727) 468

CONSTITUTIONAL LAW - Case stated - Questions referred to the Court of Appeal - If they do not arise from proceedings before the trial court - Will not be entertained as a mere academic exercise (H3) Bamaiyi v. A-G Fed. (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 128) 2939; (2001) 12 NWLR (Pt. 727) 468

CONSTITUTION LAW - Election petitions - Wrong decision - Cannot be altered by the Supreme Court under any guise - Where the Constitution has made the Court of Appeal the final court (H3) Onuaguluchi v. Ndu (2001) 3 KLR (pt. 117) 831; (2001) 7 NWLR (Pt. 712) 309

CONSTITUTIONAL LAW - Fair hearing - Meaning - S.33 (1) 1979 Constitution - Meaning of fair hearing (H1) Kenon v. Tekam (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 126) 2461; (2001) 14 NWLR (Pt. 732) 12

CONSTITUTIONAL LAW - Fair hearing s. 33 - Bias alleged against trial judge - Appellate court will not go outside the printed records of court - To conclude that the trial is unfair (H4) Ojengbede v. Esan (2001) 12 KLR (pt. 131) 3531; (2001) 18 NWLR (Pt. 746) 771

CONSTITUTIONAL LAW - Fair hearing - S.33 (1) 1979 Constitution - There was no breach of the right to fair hearing - In the circumstances of this case (H5) Kenon v. Tekam (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 126) 2461; (2001) 14 NWLR (Pt. 732) 12

CONSTITUTIONAL LAW - Fundamental Rights - Enforcement of under 1979 Rules - Chieftaincy disputes cannot be enforced under this Rule - As properly held by the lower courts (H2) Gov. of Kogi State v. Yakubu (2001) 3 KLR (pt. 118) 903; (2001) 6 NWLR (Pt.


INDEX OF SUBJECT MATTER ALL SC 2001 DECISIONS

710) 521

CONSTITUTIONAL LAW - Fundamental rights - Enforcement procedure - The relief which may be claimed by means of the procedure - Is limited to any of the provisions of Chapter IV of the Constitution (H2) Dongtoe v. Civil Service Commission Plateau State (2001) 4 KLR (pt. 120) 1239; (2001) 9 NWLR (Pt. 717) 132

CONSTITUTIONAL LAW - Fundamental rights - Enforcement procedure - Principal claim - Where a each of the provisions of chapter IV is the principal claim - The procedure can be invoked even though other claims are made (H4) Dongtoe v. Civil Service Commission Plateau State (2001) 4 KLR (pt. 120) 1239; (2001) 9 NWLR (Pt. 717) 132

CONSTITUTIONAL LAW - Fundamental Rights procedure - Jurisdiction - Competence of a court to exercise jurisdiction - Avails only when the main application is for enforcement of a fundamental right (H4) Sea Trucks Ltd. v. Anigboro (2001) 1 KLR (pt. 114) 137; (2001) 2 NWLR (Pt. 696) 159

CONSTITUTIONAL LAW - Fundamental Rights procedure - Justiciability - Cannot be sustained - Where alleged breach of fundamental right is incidental to the main complaint (H3) Sea Trucks Ltd. v. Anigboro (2001) 1 KLR (pt. 114) 137; (2001) 2 NWLR (Pt. 696) 159

CONSTITUTIONAL LAW - Immunity - Governors' Immunity s. 308(1)(a) 1999 Constitution - Where court of Appeal rightly disallowed this appeal - Proper order is to strike it out - And not sine die adjournment (H5) Tinubu v. I.M.B. Securities Ltd. (2001) 9/10 KLR (pt. 129) 3087; (2001) 16 NWLR (Pt. 740) 670

CONSTITUTIONAL LAW - Immunity from legal action - Conferred on Governors - By s. 308(1)(a) of the 1999 Constitution - Applies to discontinue pending suits against appellants (H2) Tinubu v. I.M.B. Securities Ltd. (2001) 9/10 KLR (pt. 129) 3087; (2001) 16 NWLR


INDEX OF SUBJECT MATTER ALL SC 2001 DECISIONS

(Pt. 740) 670

CONSTITUTIONAL LAW - Immunity from legal action - Waiver - S. 308(1)(a) 1999 Constitution - Neither the incumbent officers nor courts can waive it (H4) Tinubu v. I.M.B. Securities Ltd. (2001) 9/10 KLR (pt. 129) 3087; (2001) 16 NWLR (Pt. 740) 670

CONSTITUTIONAL LAW - Interpretation - S. 295(2) 1999 Constitution - Meaning of `decision' as used in the section (H2) Bamaiyi v. A-G Fed. (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 128) 2939; (2001) 12 NWLR (Pt. 727) 468

CONSTITUTIONAL LAW - Interpretation of a section - Raising any question of law or fact - Creates a dispute - That requires judicial determination (H7) A-G Fed v. A-G Abia (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 127) 2599; (2001) 11 NWLR (Pt. 725) 689

CONSTITUTIONAL LAW - Justiciability - Fundamental Rights Procedure Rules 1979 - Justiciability of a cause under the Rules - Is not exclusively the preserve of trial judge (H2) Sea Trucks Ltd. v. Anigboro (2001) 1 KLR (pt. 114) 137; (2001) 2 NWLR (Pt. 696) 159

CONSTITUTIONAL LAW - Public service of the Federation - As widely defined in s. 227(1) 1979 Constitution - Is for purpose of code of conduct of public servants - It is not a ground for a worker being under authority - Of the Federal Civil Service Commission (H4) Okomu Oil Ltd. v. Iserhienrhien (2001) 3 KLR (pt. 117) 797; (2001) 6 NWLR (Pt. 710) 660

CONSTITUTIONAL LAW - Question referred - That amounted to putting the cart before the horse - The Court of Appeal is right - To refuse to answer the question (H5) Bamaiyi v. A-G Fed. (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 128) 2939; (2001) 12 NWLR (Pt. 727) 468

CONSTITUTIONAL LAW - Reference of questions to appeal court - The right to refer - Arises only if there is a substantial question of law - Before the High Court (H4) Bamaiyi v. A-G Fed. (2001) 7 KLR (pt.


INDEX OF SUBJECT MATTER ALL SC 2001 DECISIONS

128) 2939; (2001) 12 NWLR (Pt. 727) 468

CONSTITUTIONAL LAW - Right to sue - Conflict between a state law and s. 236(1) of the 1979 Constitution - Will render the state law void for inconsistency (H1) Abu v. Odugbo (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 126) 2299; (2001) 14 NWLR (Pt. 732) 45

CONSTITUTIONAL LAW - Separation of powers - Interpretation of s. 3(1) of the Constitution - Is a judicial function and not a legislative function - National Boundary Commission may have concurrent powers - In respect of the said section (H4) A-G Fed v. A-G Abia (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 127) 2599; (2001) 11 NWLR (Pt. 725) 689

CONSTITUTIONAL LAW - State creation Provision vesting property - On new States - Contracting out of it - Parties cannot contract out of the provision - And cannot contract into it (H8) A-G Ondo State v. A-G Ekiti State (2001) 9/10 KLR (pt. 129) 3161; (2001) 17 NWLR (Pt. 743) 706

CONSTITUTIONAL LAW - State creation - Sharing of assets - Constitutionality of - Plaintiff who is not vested with any property under s. 7(1) of Decree No. 36 - Cannot question constitutionality of steps related thereto (H5) A-G Ondo State v. A-G Ekiti State (2001) 9/10 KLR (pt. 129) 3161; (2001) 17 NWLR (Pt. 743) 706

CONTEMPT OF COURT - Civil contempt - Application for committal - Procedure - Such an application must strictly comply with the provisions set out in the Judgments (Enforcement) Rules (H5) Abbas v. Solomon (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 126) 2549; (2001) 15 NWLR (Pt. 735) 144

CONTEMPT OF COURT - Civil contempt - Committal - Power to order committal for civil contempt - Conditions for the exercise of the power (H4) Abbas v. Solomon (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 126) 2549; (2001) 15 NWLR (Pt. 735) 144

CONTEMPT OF COURT - Civil contempt of court - What it means


INDEX OF SUBJECT MATTER ALL SC 2001 DECISIONS

(H1) Abbas v. Solomon (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 126) 2549; (2001) 15 NWLR (Pt. 735) 144

CONTEMPT OF COURT - Committal - Where any person refuses or neglects to comply with an order made against him - Other than for payment of money - The Court has ample jurisdiction to order that he be committed to prison (H3) Abbas v. Solomon (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 126) 2549; (2001) 15 NWLR (Pt. 735) 144

CONTEMPT OF COURT - Committal proceedings - Fair hearing - Where the judgment debtors were not heard - The whole proceedings fell short of the standard of fair hearing (H8) Abbas v. Solomon (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 126) 2549; (2001) 15 NWLR (Pt. 735) 144

CONTEMPT OF COURT - Committal proceedings - Procedure to be followed - Before an order to commit a judgment debtor to prison may be made (H7) Abbas v. Solomon (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 126) 2549; (2001) 15 NWLR (Pt. 735) 144

CONTEMPT OF COURT - Committal proceedings - Requirement - Before committal proceedings are instituted - What the judgment creditor must do (H6) Abbas v. Solomon (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 126) 2549; (2001) 15 NWLR (Pt. 735) 144

CONTRACTS - Binding nature of - The deposit of the contractual document - With the respondents bank cannot make the respondent - Bound by its terms (H9) Makwe v. Nwukor (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 126) 2573; (2001) 14 NWLR (Pt. 733) 356

CONTRACTS - Breach of contract - Where the facts constituting the breach - Amounts to a tort - A stranger to the contract may sue for breach of duty of care owed to him (H2) Makwe v. Nwukor (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 126) 2573; (2001) 14 NWLR (Pt. 733) 356

CONTRACTS - Fraudulent misrepresentation - Where a statement is true - In the sense in which it was meant - And it is understood in another sense which is untrue - The representor is not guilty of fraud


INDEX OF SUBJECT MATTER ALL SC 2001 DECISIONS

(H4) Afegbai v. A-G Edo State (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 127) 2709; (2001) 14 NWLR (Pt. 733) 425

CONTRACTS - Parties - As the respondent was not a party to the contract - It could not be bound by it - As the Court of Appeal rightly held (H8) Makwe v. Nwukor (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 126) 2573; (2001) 14 NWLR (Pt. 733) 356

CONTRACTS - Parties - Only parties to a contract can sue or be sued on the contract (H1) Makwe v. Nwukor (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 126) 2573; (2001) 14 NWLR (Pt. 733) 356

CONTRACTS - Pawn or pledge - Validity - It is void if the pawnor has no authority from the owner - And therefore cannot hold it against the owner (H2) Labode v. Otubu (2001) 3 KLR (pt. 117) 699; (2001) 7 NWLR (Pt. 712) 256

CONTRACTS - Rescission - Cannot be based - On a misinterpretation of the representor's statement - Which is not false (H5) Afegbai v. A-G Edo State (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 127) 2709; (2001) 14 NWLR (Pt. 733) 425

CONTRACTS - Specific performance - Appeals - Concurrent findings of lower courts - Are perverse and are set aside - And the order of specific performance set aside (H8) Incar Nig. Plc. v. Bolex Enterprises (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 123) 1823; (2001) 12 NWLR (Pt. 728) 646

CONTRACTS - Wrongful termination - Breach of terms of the contract of employment - Onus of proof in on the employee who filed the action (H1) Okomu Oil Ltd. v. Iserhienrhien (2001) 3 KLR (pt. 117) 797; (2001) 6 NWLR (Pt. 710) 660

CONVEYANCING - Exhibit - From the evidence in this case - The land in dispute was not within the land conveyed (H1) Basil v. Fajebe (2001) 4 KLR (pt. 120) 1273; (2001) 11 NWLR (Pt. 725) 592

CONVICTIONS - Circumstantial evidence - Can ground a conviction


INDEX OF SUBJECT MATTER ALL SC 2001 DECISIONS

- Only if there are no coexisting circumstances - Which can weaken its cogency (H4) State v. Ogbubunjo (2001) 1 KLR (pt. 114) 221; (2001) 2 NWLR (Pt. 698) 576

CONVICTIONS - Confessional statements - Conviction - An accused can be convicted - On his confessions alone - When certain conditions are met - Even if the confession is retracted (H1) Hassan v. State (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 127) 2789; (2001) 15 NWLR (Pt. 735) 184

CONVICTIONS - Conviction for lesser offence - Homicide - Though not established - Appellant is guilty of causing hurt by dangerous means s. 248 () (H6) Ahmed v. State (2001) 12 KLR (pt. 130) 33; (2001) 18 NWLR (Pt. 746) 622

CONVICTIONS - Evidence - Circumstantial evidence - Conviction - Based on circumstantial evidence - Is permitted - But the evidence relied on must be narrowly considered (H5) Ijioffor v. State (2001) 4 KLR (pt. 120) 1345; (2001) 9 NWLR (Pt. 718) 371

CONVICTIONS - Evidence - Circumstantial evidence - Conviction - What must be established - Before circumstantial evidence can sustain the conviction of an accused (H6) Ijioffor v. State (2001) 4 KLR (pt. 120) 1345; (2001) 9 NWLR (Pt. 718) 371

CONVICTIONS - Expunged evidence - As the conviction is supported by overwhelming evidence - Despite the expunged evidence - The conviction is confirmed (H16) Udoebre v. State (2001) 6 KLR (pt. 124) 1945; (2001) 12 NWLR (Pt. 728) 617

CONVICTIONS - Hearsay evidence - Conviction based on hearsay evidence - Appellate court may quash such conviction - In the absence of other evidence (H4) Ijioffor v. State (2001) 4 KLR (pt. 120) 1345; (2001) 9 NWLR (Pt. 718) 371

CONVICTIONS - Homicide - Proof beyond reasonable doubt - Where not establish - Mere speculation or suspicion - Cannot ground conviction (H5) Ahmed v. State (2001) 12 KLR (pt. 130) 33; (2001) 18 NWLR (Pt. 746) 622


INDEX OF SUBJECT MATTER ALL SC 2001 DECISIONS

CONVICTIONS - Murder - Burden of proof - There must be proof beyond reasonable doubt - For conviction to stand (H10) State v. Ogbubunjo (2001) 1 KLR (pt. 114) 221; (2001) 2 NWLR (Pt. 698) 576

CONVICTION - Propriety of - Conviction of appellant for a different offence - Was rightly confirmed by the court of Appeal - In the present case (H4) Oduneye v. State (2001) 1 KLR (pt. 114) 355; (2001) 2 NWLR (Pt. 697) 311

CONVICTIONS - Suspicion - Can never amount to proof - Court must not convict on mere evidence of suspicion (H5) State v. Ogbubunjo (2001) 1 KLR (pt. 114) 221; (2001) 2 NWLR (Pt. 698) 576

CORROBORATION - Confessional statement - Is sufficient to ground and support conviction - Without corroboration - If court is satisfied of its truth (H2) Alarape v. State (2001) 2 KLR (pt. 116) 543; (2001) 5 NWLR (Pt. 705) 79

CORROBORATION - Interested persons - Relationship by blood per se - Is not sufficient to disqualify the evidence of a witness (H1) Akpan v. State (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 127) 2767; (2001) 15 NWLR (Pt. 737) 745

CORROBORATION - Rape - The circumstance of this case - Warranted corroboration of prosecutrix evidence - Which burden was not discharged (H13) Iko v. State (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 126) 2419; (2001) 14 NWLR (Pt. 732) 221

CORROBORATION - Rape - The evidence of PW3 - Based on hearsay cannot be corroboration of evidence of the prosecutrix (H6) Jegede v. State (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 126) 2527; (2001) 14 NWLR (Pt. 733) 264

COURT PROCESSES - Abuse of court processes - For an action to


INDEX OF SUBJECT MATTER ALL SC 2001 DECISIONS

be declared an abuse of court processes - There must be two or more actions between the same parties - In respect of the same subject matter- In one or more courts - At the same time (H7) Ikine v. Edjerode (2001) 12 KLR (pt. 131) 3711; (2001) 18 NWLR (Pt. 745) 446

COURT PROCESSES - Abuse of - Where a party exercises his constitutional right to appeal - Even if he had applied for extension of time - To comply with the same court order - His conduct does not amount to abuse of court process (H1) CBN v. Ahmed (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 123) 1897; (2001) 11 NWLR (Pt. 724) 369

COURT PROCESSES - Hearing notice - Non appearance of party - The dismissal of the appellants' case - Was a breach of his right to fair hearing - As there was no proof of service of hearing notice on him (H4) Ogundoyin v. Adeyemi (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 127) 2687; (2001) 13 NWLR (Pt. 730) 403

COURT PROCESSES - Judgment - Enforcement of - Unless otherwise stipulated by statute Judgment may be enforced by a writ of attachment or by committal (H2) Abbas v. Solomon (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 126) 2549; (2001) 15 NWLR (Pt. 735) 144

COURT PROCESSES - Non service of - Only the affected party can complain - About such a failure (H1) Chime v. Chime (2001) 1 KLR (pt. 114) 269; (2001) 3 NWLR (Pt. 701) 527

COURT PROCESSES - Service of process - Business name - It is enough to effect service - On a partner - Or on a person having defacto control or management of a business using a business name - And at the principal place of business (H7) Iyke Medical Merchandise v. Pfizer Inc. (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 121) 1377; (2001) 10 NWLR (Pt. 722) 540

COURTS - Abuse of court process - Statement of claim that disclosed a reasonable cause of action - Is an abuse of the process of the court (H5) Labode v. Otubu (2001) 3 KLR (pt. 117) 699; (2001) 7 NWLR


INDEX OF SUBJECT MATTER ALL SC 2001 DECISIONS

(Pt. 712) 256

COURTS - Abuse of court processes - For an action to be declared an abuse of court processes - There must be two or more actions between the same parties - In respect of the same subject matter - In one or more courts - At the same time (H7) Ikine v. Edjorode (2001) 12 KLR (pt. 131) 3711; (2001) 18 NWLR (Pt. 745) 446

COURTS - Abuse of process - Pleadings - Amendment - Which is designed to overreach - By making a ground of appeal useless - Constitutes an abuse of process of court - And ought to be dismissed (H4) Kode v. Yussuf (2001) 2 KLR (pt. 115) 457; (2001) 4 NWLR (Pt. 703) 392

COURTS - Appeals - Technicalities - Court has shifted - From undue reliance on technicalities - To doing substantial justice - Between the parties before it (H2) Odonigi v. Oyeleke (2001) 2 KLR (pt. 116) 625; (2001) 6 NWLR (Pt. 708) 12

COURTS - Arraignment - Validity - The omission of the trial judge - To state that he was satisfied that the appellant understood the charge - Would not constitute non compliance - With the constitutional and procedural requirement (H5) Adeniji v. State (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 123) 1799; (2001) 13 NWLR (Pt. 730) 375

COURTS - Customary Court's decisions - Interpretation of - Where respectively interpreted - In breach of guidelines - Judgment should be reversed (H8) Odofin v. Oni (2001) 1 KLR (pt. 114) 303; (2001) 3 NWLR (Pt. 701) 488

COURTS - Decisions - Duty of trial judge - Is to reach a decision - Only upon the basis of what is in issue - And what has been demonstrated by evidence supported by law - Failure in this duty - Will make the appellate court to intervene (H4) Adeleke v. Iyanda (2001) 6 KLR (pt. 124) 1973; (2001) 13 NWLR (Pt. 729) 1

COURTS - Discretion - Evidence - An exercise of discretion by a


INDEX OF SUBJECT MATTER ALL SC 2001 DECISIONS

court - Must be guided by evidence (H8) Menakaya v. Menakaya (2001) 9/10 KLR (pt. 129) 3037; (2001) 16 NWLR (Pt. 738) 203

COURTS - Discretion - Leave to argue new points of law - Supreme Court will not interfere with the lower courts exercise of discretion - Except where it is not bona fide (H6) Eze v. A-G Rivers State (2001) 12 KLR (pt. 131) 3611; (2001) 18 NWLR (Pt. 746) 524

COURTS - Discretion - The trial judge did not properly exercise his judicial discretion - As he made his order in the absence of any evidence - To support his order (H5) Union Bank Plc. v. Emole (2001) 12 KLR (pt. 131) 3559; (2001) 18 NWLR (Pt. 745) 501

COURTS - Duty - Appeals - Leave to appeal - The court's duty in considering the grounds of appeal - Proposed in support of the appeal - Is limited to whether the grounds are substantial and reveal arguable grounds - And not the merit of such grounds (H3) CBN v. Ahmed (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 123) 1897; (2001) 11 NWLR (Pt. 724) 369

COURTS - Duty - Speculation - The duty of the court is not to embark on speculation - But to act upon facts tested before it - According to the rules and law (H8) Kode v. Yussuf (2001) 2 KLR (pt. 115) 457; (2001) 4 NWLR (Pt. 703) 392

COURTS - Error - Admissibility - Document - That is not tendered by any of the parties - But is a sketch made by trial court - Lower Court wrongfully rejected it as inadmissible (H1) Duru v. Onwumelu (2001) 12 KLR (pt. 130) 3287; (2001) 18 NWLR (Pt. 746) 672

COURTS - Error - Court of Appeal was in error - As to have failed to consider and pronounce upon the issues formulated by the appellant (H4) Bamaiyi v. State (2001) 4 KLR (pt. 119) 1043; (2001) 8 NWLR (Pt. 715) 270

COURTS - Error - Extra judicial statements - Error of lower court in considering them - Cannot vitiate a judgment unless miscarriage of


INDEX OF SUBJECT MATTER ALL SC 2001 DECISIONS

justice is occasioned thereby (H9) State v. Ogbubunjo (2001) 1 KLR (pt. 114) 221; (2001) 2 NWLR (Pt. 698) 576

COURTS - Error of trial court - It was a fundamental error - For the Court to present facts - Which were not the case - Of either of the parties (H1) Oyefolu v. Durosinmi (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 128) 2997; (2001) 16 NWLR (Pt. 738) 1

COURTS - Error of trial court - The court misdirected itself - By putting into issue - A fact that was not contested by the parties - In their pleadings (H2) Adeleke v. Iyanda (2001) 6 KLR (pt. 124) 1973; (2001) 13 NWLR (Pt. 729) 1

COURTS - Evaluation of evidence - Once the trial judge has properly considered the evidence - Style used in evaluating such evidence is not a matter to impugn (H5) Awopejo v. State (2001) 12 KLR (pt. 131) 3579; (2001) 18 NWLR (Pt. 745) 430

COURTS - Evidence - As the only vital evidence of pw2 was not contradicted by other evidence - The judge was bound to accept and act on it - Even if it were minimal (H6) Adeleke v. Iyanda (2001) 6 KLR (pt. 124) 1973; (2001) 13 NWLR (Pt. 729) 1

COURTS - Evidence - Of relevant facts - Should not be ignored in deciding the probability of a question of fact - Lest public confidence in judicial process be severely eroded (H6) Basil v. Fajebe (2001) 4 KLR (pt. 120) 1273; (2001) 11 NWLR (Pt. 725) 592

COURTS - Exercise of Discretion - The considerations on which the Court of Appeal exercised its discretion - Were not judicious or judicial or proper (H1) Ogundoyin v. Adeyemi (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 127) 2687; (2001) 13 NWLR (Pt. 730) 403

COURTS - Fair hearing - Bias or likelihood of bias - Levelled against trial court - Proof - To succeed the accuser must be able to establish the facts and ground he relies upon (H3) Ojengbede v. Esan (2001) 12 KLR (pt. 131) 3531; (2001) 18 NWLR (Pt. 746) 771


INDEX OF SUBJECT MATTER ALL SC 2001 DECISIONS

COURTS - Fair hearing - Issue - Raised suo motu - The parties must be given an opportunity to be heard on the issue (H10) Abbas v. Solomon (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 126) 2549; (2001) 15 NWLR (Pt. 735) 144

COURTS - Fair hearing s. 33 of the Constitution - Bias alleged against trial judge - Appellate court will not go outside the printed records of court - To conclude that the trial is unfair (H4) Ojengbede v. Esan (2001) 12 KLR (pt. 131) 3531; (2001) 18 NWLR (Pt. 746) 771

COURTS - Federal High Court - Jurisdiction - Oil spillage - Spillage and Pollution which occurred in the course of repair of indented pipeline - Is a matter arising from - Mines and minerals including oil fields and oil mining - And falls within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Federal High Court - As provided under s. 230 (1) (a) of Decree No. 107 (H4) Isaiah v. Shell Petroleum Ltd. (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 122) 1631; (2001) 11 NWLR (Pt. 723) 168

COURTS - Findings - On evidence and issues - Not before the court is unacceptable - But where supported by ample evidence - The findings will be affirmed (H6) Odonigi v. Oyeleke (2001) 2 KLR (pt. 116) 625; (2001) 6 NWLR (Pt. 708) 12

COURTS - Fundamental Rights Procedure - Competence - of a court to exercise jurisdiction - Avails only when the main application is for enforcement of a fundamental right (H4) Sea Trucks Ltd. Anigboro (2001) 1 KLR (pt. 114) 137; (2001) 2 NWLR (Pt. 696) 159

COURTS - Hearing in chambers - Based on consent of both counsel - Contrary to mandatory statutory provision - The proceedings and judgment - Are a nullity (H5) Menakaya v. Menakaya (2001) 9/10 KLR (pt. 129) 3037; (2001) 16 NWLR (Pt. 738) 203

COURTS - High Court - Jurisdiction - Ouster clause - Proceedings before a tribunal - Ouster of jurisdiction of High Court - Should not preclude it from determining - Whether the proceedings in question


INDEX OF SUBJECT MATTER ALL SC 2001 DECISIONS

- Comes within the scope of power conferred by the enabling statute (H4) Miscellaneous Offences Tribunal v. Okoroafor (2001) 9/10 KLR (pt. 129) 3233; (2001) 18 NWLR (Pt. 745) 295

COURTS - Interlocutory matter - Pronouncement touching on the main issue - That was only a reflection of the court - Would not inhibit a court - That has to determine the real issues between the parties (H8) Miscellaneous Offences Tribunal v. Okoroafor (2001) 9/10 KLR (pt. 129) 3233; (2001) 18 NWLR (Pt. 745) 295

COURTS - Issue - Not placed before the Court - The court has no business dealing with it (H9) Abbas v. Solomon (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 126) 2549; (2001) 15 NWLR (Pt. 735) 144

COURTS - Issue - Error of court - Issues not arising - The courts below fell into error - To have insisted on the proof of an issue - Which did not arise before the court (H2) Adeniran v. Alao (2001) 12 KLR (pt. 131) 3669; (2001) 18 NWLR (Pt. 745) 361

COURTS - Issues - Evidence - Trial judge was in error - To have based his conclusion - On facts neither pleaded nor testified to in evidence - By the parties (H1) Nteogwuile v. Otuo (2001) 6 KLR (pt. 125) 2205; (2001) 16 NWLR (Pt. 738) 58

COURTS - Issues - Suo motu raising of issues - Did not arise in this case - Court of Appeal merely pronounced its own view - On the issue fully argued by the parties (H1) Tinubu v. I.M.B. Securities Ltd. (2001) 9/10 KLR (pt. 129) 3087; (2001) 16 NWLR (Pt. 740) 670

COURTS - Judgments - Delivery - Failure to communicate delivery date to a party - Is a mere irregularity - With no effect on substance of the judgment - Or jurisdiction of the matter (H5) Chime v. Chime (2001) 1 KLR (pt. 114) 269; (2001) 3 NWLR (Pt. 701) 527

COURTS - Judgments - Pleadings - It is not for a court to speculate what defences - May have been available to a defendant (H11) Offoboche v. Ogoja L.G. (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 128) 2843; (2001) 16


INDEX OF SUBJECT MATTER ALL SC 2001 DECISIONS

NWLR (Pt. 739) 458

COURTS - Judgments - Slips or error - Can be corrected by the court - As such slips - Will not undermine or derogate from a good judgment (H2) Odofin v. Oni (2001) 1 KLR (pt. 114) 303; (2001) 3 NWLR (Pt. 701) 488

COURTS - Jurisdiction - Cause of action - Which arose before the jurisdiction of the court is ousted - Any further hearing of the matter is null and void - Because any decision it makes amounts to nothing (H5) Isaiah v. Shell Petroleum Ltd. (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 122) 1631; (2001) 11 NWLR (Pt. 723) 168

COURTS - Jurisdiction - Departure from endorsed claim - Gives rise to new cause of action - For which the court's jurisdiction has not been invoked (H2) Adenuga v. Odumeru (2001) 1 KLR (pt. 114) 197; (2001) 2 NWLR (Pt. 696) 184

COURTS - Jurisdiction - Ouster - By a statute - The courts are obliged to uphold the ouster of its jurisdiction (H2) Miscellaneous Offences Tribunal v. Okoroafor (2001) 9/10 KLR (pt. 129) 3233; (2001) 18 NWLR (Pt. 745) 295

COURTS - Jurisdiction - Ouster Clause - Ordinary meaning is to be applied - As courts jealously guard their jurisdiction (H3) Nig. Engineering Works Ltd. v. Denap Ltd. (2001) 12 KLR (pt. 130) 33; (2001) 18 NWLR (Pt. 746) 726

COURTS - Jurisdiction - Ouster provisions of a statute - Court reserves the right to consider - Whether the ouster clause ought to be obeyed (H3) Miscellaneous Offences Tribunal v. Okoroafor (2001) 9/10 KLR (pt. 129) 3233; (2001) 18 NWLR (Pt. 745) 295

COURTS - Jurisdiction - Reliefs - Since they are not related to a claim before the court - Court is incompetent and has no jurisdiction to hear it (H5) Adenuga v. Odumeru (2001) 1 KLR (pt. 114) 197;


INDEX OF SUBJECT MATTER ALL SC 2001 DECISIONS

(2001) 2 NWLR (Pt. 696) 184

COURTS - Language of the court - Documents in language other than English - Before they can be properly tendered and used in evidence - Must be duly translated - And the judge cannot on his own engage in the interpretation (H8) Ojengbede v. Esan (2001) 12 KLR (pt. 131) 3531; (2001) 18 NWLR (Pt. 746) 771

COURTS - Legal practitioner - Authority of Counsel - At the trial of an action- Extends when it is not expressly limited - To the whole of the court action - But it does not fetter the discretion of the court (H9) Vulcan Gases Ltd. v. Gasellschaft Fur Industries (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 121) 1437; (2001) 9 NWLR (Pt. 719) 610

COURTS - Non suit - Civil proceedings - Balance of probabilities as basis for judgment - Overwhelming evidence - Makes order of non suit improper (H2) Nsirim v. Onuma Construction Co. Ltd. (2001) 3 KLR (pt. 118) 853; (2001) 7 NWLR (Pt. 713) 742

COURTS - Pleadings - Binding nature of on court and the parties - Court must not stray away from the pleadings - To deal with issues not properly before it (H1) Adeniran v. Alao (2001) 12 KLR (pt. 131) 3669; (2001) 18 NWLR (Pt. 745) 361

COURTS - Principle in Kojo II v. Bonsie - Should not be applied - If the conditions for its application are not present (H5) Olatunde v. Abidogun (2001) 12 KLR (pt. 131) 3653; (2001) 18 NWLR (Pt. 746) 712

COURTS - Review and evaluation of evidence - Distinction between the two - The duty was property discharged by trial court (H6) Abidoye v. Alawode (2001) 3 KLR (pt. 118) 917; (2001) 6 NWLR (Pt. 709) 463

COURTS - Special procedure - Non compliance with - Where a special procedure is prescribed for the enforcement of a particular right or remedy - Non Compliance with such a procedure is fatal to the


INDEX OF SUBJECT MATTER ALL SC 2001 DECISIONS

enforcement of the remedy (H3) Dongtoe v. Civil Service Commission Plateau State (2001) 4 KLR (pt. 120) 1239; (2001) 9 NWLR (Pt. 717) 132

COURTS - Suo motu issues - Appeal - Trial judge was in error - To raise suo motu issues - And use it against a party - Without hearing from the parties (H4) Nteogwuile v. Otuo (2001) 6 KLR (pt. 125) 2205; (2001) 16 NWLR (Pt. 738) 58

COURTS - Suo motu issues - May be raised by the court - But court must not base its decision thereon - Without inviting the parties to address it on such issues (H1) Hambe v. Hueze (2001) 2 KLR (pt. 115) 437; (2001) 4 NWLR (Pt. 703) 372

COURTS - Suo motu issues - Must not be raised by the court - And resolved without hearing the parties (H5) Abimbola v. Abatan (2001) 4 KLR (pt. 120) 1149; (2001) 9 NWLR (Pt. 717) 66

COURTS - Technicalities - Court are more concerned with doing substantial justice - And concern themselves with the substance and not the form (H3) Psychiatric Hospitals Board v. Edosa (2001) 2 KLR (pt. 116) 3531; (2001) 5 NWLR (Pt. 707) 612

COURTS - Witnesses - Disbelieving of - A trial judge is at liberty - To disbelieve some portion of a witness's testimony - While believing his unaffected evidence (H14) Udoebre v. State (2001) 6 KLR (pt. 124) 1945; (2001) 12 NWLR (Pt. 728) 617

CRIMINAL LAW - Appeals - Criminal defences - Concurrent findings - That defence of accident failed - Will not be disturbed - As there was no miscarriage of justice (H2) Amayo v. State (2001) 12 KLR (pt. 130) 3551; (2001) 18 NWLR (Pt. 745) 251

CRIMINAL LAW - Applicability of a statute - S. 12 (4) Criminal Code Laws of Lagos State - Cannot avail the appellant - As the place of death of the accused - Was not certain (H7) Adeniji v. State (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 123) 1799; (2001) 13 NWLR (Pt. 730) 375


INDEX OF SUBJECT MATTER ALL SC 2001 DECISIONS

CRIMINAL LAW - Attempted offence - Meaning - The end to which the accused arrived - Must have been substantially attained - But for unanticipated intervention (H4) Jegede v. State (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 126) 2527; (2001) 14 NWLR (Pt. 733) 264

CRIMINAL LAW - Banking - Master & servant - Banking malpractices irregularities and dishonest practices - Of which appellant was guilty - Does not constitute any offence known to our criminal law (H3) Olarewaju v. Afribank Nig. Plc. (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 126) 2395; (2001) 13 NWLR (Pt. 731) 691

CRIMINAL LAW - Common intention - Its proof may be inferred - From circumstances described in the evidence - And not only from the express agreement of the accused persons (H5) Alarape v. State (2001) 2 KLR (pt. 116) 543; (2001) 5 NWLR (Pt. 705) 79

CRIMINAL LAW - Common intention - Test for liability under - S.8 Criminal Code Law of Ogun State 1978 - Is whether the act is a probable consequence - Of the prosecution of the joint unlawful act or common intention (H6) Alarape v. State (2001) 2 KLR (pt. 116) 543; (2001) 5 NWLR (Pt. 705) 79

CRIMINAL LAW - Corroboration - Classes of criminal cases - In which corroboration is required (H7) Iko v. State (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 126) 2419; (2001) 14 NWLR (Pt. 732) 221

CRIMINAL LAW - Criminal defences - Defence of mens rea or accident s. 24 CC - What is required - To prove each arm of the defences under s. 24 (H1) Amayo v. State (2001) 12 KLR (pt. 130) 3551; (2001) 18 NWLR (Pt. 745) 251

CRIMINAL LAW - Culpable Homicide - Eye witness evidence - Must be clear and unequivocal - As to opportunity of seeing the accused (H3) Dogo v. State (2001) 1 KLR (pt. 114) 329; (2001) 3 NWLR (Pt. 699) 192


INDEX OF SUBJECT MATTER ALL SC 2001 DECISIONS

CRIMINAL LAW - Culpable Homicide - Eye witness evidence - Unresolved contradictions and inconsistencies - Would entitle accused to benefit of doubt (H2) Dogo v. State (2001) 1 KLR (pt. 114) 329; (2001) 3 NWLR (Pt. 699) 192

CRIMINAL LAW - Insanity - Implication of raising the defence - It is prima facie an acceptance of the act complained of (H3) Madjemu v. State (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 121) 1411; (2001) 9 NWLR (Pt. 718) 349

CRIMINAL LAW - Jurisdiction - Place of offence - Where an offence is committed outside Lagos State - And the appellant afterwards enters Lagos State - The entry confers jurisdiction - On the Lagos High Court to try him (H6) Adeniji v. State (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 123) 1799; (2001) 13 NWLR (Pt. 730) 375

CRIMINAL LAW - Murder - Appeals - Unconvincing and unsatisfactory circumstantial evidence - Conviction must be set aside (H6) State v. Ogbubunjo (2001) 1 KLR (pt. 114) 221; (2001) 2 NWLR (Pt. 698) 576

CRIMINAL LAW - Murder - Ingredients of the offence - Must be wholly proved by prosecution - To ground a conviction (H1) State v. Ogbubunjo (2001) 1 KLR (pt. 114) 221; (2001) 2 NWLR (Pt. 698) 576

CRIMINAL LAW - Murder - Intention - Elements required under s. 316 CC - Include proof of intention - Which if not established - Accused will not be convicted (H5) Amayo v. State (2001) 12 KLR (pt. 130) 3551; (2001) 18 NWLR (Pt. 745) 251

CRIMINAL LAW - Rape - Consent - The lower courts rightly held - That there was no consent - Based on the evidence before them (H2) Iko v. State (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 126) 2419; (2001) 14 NWLR (Pt. 732) 221

CRIMINAL LAW - Rape - Contradictions - There were some contradictions - In the evidence of the witnesses - As outlined in this case


INDEX OF SUBJECT MATTER ALL SC 2001 DECISIONS

(H3) Iko v. State (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 126) 2419; (2001) 14 NWLR (Pt. 732) 221

CRIMINAL LAW - Rape - Definition and elements of the offence (H1) Iko v. State (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 126) 2419; (2001) 14 NWLR (Pt. 732) 221

CRIMINAL LAW - Rape - Penetration - The lower courts wrongly accepted the evidence of penetration - By the prosecutrix - In the absence of medical or other corroborative evidence (H11) Iko v. State (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 126) 2419; (2001) 14 NWLR (Pt. 732) 221

CRIMINAL LAW - Rape - Penetration - There must be proof of penetration - Which must be linked with the appellant - Before he is convicted (H2) Jegede v. State (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 126) 2527; (2001) 14 NWLR (Pt. 733) 264

CRIMINAL LAW - Rape - Proof - The evidence of the pathologist - Is not sufficient proof - To convict for rape (H1) Jegede v. State (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 126) 2527; (2001) 14 NWLR (Pt. 733) 264

CRIMINAL LAW - Rape - When committed - The offence cannot be said to have been committed - In the circumstances of this case (H3) Jegede v. State (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 126) 2527; (2001) 14 NWLR (Pt. 733) 264

CRIMINAL LAW - Self defence - In a hand to hand fight - Where the accused used a knife and stabbed the other who later died - Self defence is negatived. (H3) Odu v. State (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 122) 1551; (2001) 10 NWLR (Pt. 722) 668

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE - Acquittal - Rape - The contradictions in this case - Are not sufficient by themselves - To entitle the appellant to an acquittal - As they are not material (H4) Iko v. State (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 126) 2419; (2001) 14 NWLR (Pt. 732) 221

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE - Alibi - Consideration of - Any plausible


INDEX OF SUBJECT MATTER ALL SC 2001 DECISIONS

defence raised by the defence - Or arising casually or by the tenor of evidence - Must be considered by the court (H4) Udoebre v. State (2001) 6 KLR (pt. 124) 1945; (2001) 12 NWLR (Pt. 728) 617

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE - Alibi - Defence - Failure to investigate or consider the defence - Will lead to quashing a conviction on appeal - If it has occasioned a miscarriage of justice (H5) Udoebre v. State (2001) 6 KLR (pt. 124) 1945; (2001) 12 NWLR (Pt. 728) 617

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE - Alibi - Defence of - Was rightly rejected by court - Because of the credible witnesses that identified the appellants at the scene of crime - And the roles they played at the scene (H7) Awopejo v. State (2001) 12 KLR (pt. 131) 3579; (2001) 18 NWLR (Pt. 745) 430

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE - Alibi - Failure to investigate - Consequence - Where there is positive evidence which cancels the alibi - Failure to investigate the alibi - Would not be fatal to conviction (H1) Odu v. State (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 122) 1551; (2001) 10 NWLR (Pt. 722) 668

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE - Alibi - Meaning of (H3) Udoebre v. State (2001) 6 KLR (pt. 124) 1945; (2001) 12 NWLR (Pt. 728) 617

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE - Alibi - Onus - Of establishing the defence - Is on the accused - Even if the police has failed to investigate the observation (H2) Odu v. State (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 122) 1551; (2001) 10 NWLR (Pt. 722) 668

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE - Alibi - Places an onus on prosecution - To prove beyond reasonable doubt - The presence of the accused at the scene of the offence (H4) Dogo v. State (2001) 1 KLR (pt. 114) 329; (2001) 3 NWLR (Pt. 699) 192

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE - Alibi - Proof - Once the plaintiff has furnished information of his whereabouts - The burden shifts to the prosecution to disprove the defence (H9) Udoebre v. State (2001) 6 KLR (pt. 124) 1945; (2001) 12 NWLR (Pt. 728) 617


INDEX OF SUBJECT MATTER ALL SC 2001 DECISIONS

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE - Alibi - Success of - Is based on accused furnishing comprehensive particulars of his whereabouts on the crucial day - Which must be capable of investigation by the police (H6) Udoebre v. State (2001) 6 KLR (pt. 124) 1945; (2001) 12 NWLR (Pt. 728) 617

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE - Alibi - Timing - It must be timely raised - To enable the police investigate it - And cannot be raised first at the trial in court (H7) Udoebre v. State (2001) 6 KLR (pt. 124) 1945; (2001) 12 NWLR (Pt. 728) 617

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE - Alibi - Vagueness of - Where the alibi consist of vague accounts - Devoid of material facts capable of investigation - It cannot avail an accused person (H8) Udoebre v. State (2001) 6 KLR (pt. 124) 1945; (2001) 12 NWLR (Pt. 728) 617

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE - Appeals - Issues - Defences raised - Which are not contained in the issues for determination - Will not be considered (H3) Akpan v. State (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 127) 2767; (2001) 15 NWLR (Pt. 737) 745

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE - Arraignment - A valid arraignment must satisfy certain requirements - As set out in the judgment (H1) Adeniji v. State (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 123) 1799; (2001) 13 NWLR (Pt. 730) 375

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE - Arraignment - All the conditions for its validity - Must be satisfied as shown by the record of trial - And nothing should be left to speculation (H2) Adeniji v. State (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 123) 1799; (2001) 13 NWLR (Pt. 730) 375

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE - Arraignment - Not every requirement for its validity - Must appear on the record - And the judge need not record his satisfaction - As to the reading and explanation of the charge to the accused (H3) Adeniji v. State (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 123) 1799; (2001) 13 NWLR (Pt. 730) 375


INDEX OF SUBJECT MATTER ALL SC 2001 DECISIONS

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE - Arraignment - The plea of the accused - Was taken without explaining the charge to him - In the only language he understands - And the trial was therefore null and void (H1) Rufai v. State (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 128) 2981; (2001) 13 NWLR (Pt. 731) 719

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE - Arraignment - Validity - The omission of the trial judge - To state that he was satisfied that the appellant understood the charge - Would not constitute non compliance - With the constitutional and procedural requirement (H5) Adeniji v. State (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 123) 1799; (2001) 13 NWLR (Pt. 730) 375

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE - Arraignment - Where the accused understands the language of the court - The need to record that the charge was read to him - In a language he understands - Is obviated (H4) Adeniji v. State (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 123) 1799; (2001) 13 NWLR (Pt. 730) 375

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE - Burden of proof - Admission of guilt - Where there is an admission of guilt - The question of establishing the legal burden of proof no longer arises (H5) Dongtoe v. Civil Service Commission Plateau State (2001) 4 KLR (pt. 120) 1239; (2001) 9 NWLR (Pt. 717) 132

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE - Burden of proof - Lies without exception on the prosecution - To prove the offence beyond reasonable doubt (H5) Oduneye v. State (2001) 1 KLR (pt. 114) 355; (2001) 2 NWLR (Pt. 697) 311

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE - Charges - Criminal Procedure Rules 1970 - Abridgment of the provision of the Rules - Did not amount to a denial of right to fair hearing (H3) Awopejo v. State (2001) 12 KLR (pt. 131) 3579; (2001) 18 NWLR (Pt. 745) 430

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE - Charges - Discrepancies between charges and evidence - The discrepancies did not mislead the appellant in


INDEX OF SUBJECT MATTER ALL SC 2001 DECISIONS

any way - And was therefore not fatal (H4) Awopejo v. State (2001) 12 KLR (pt. 131) 3579; (2001) 18 NWLR (Pt. 745) 430

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE - Circumstantial Evidence - In the absence of any satisfactory explanation - To the evidence led at trial - The trial judge was justified - In inferring the existence of a guilty intent - And returning a finding of guilty - Based on the circumstantial evidence (H8) Adeniji v. State (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 123) 1799; (2001) 13 NWLR (Pt. 730) 375

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE - Circumstantial Evidence - Nature - Evidence of surrounding circumstances - If not capable of proving a proposition with accuracy of mathematics - Cannot establish an offence beyond reasonable doubt (H3) State v. Ogbunbunjo (2001) 1 KLR (pt. 114) 221; (2001) 2 NWLR (Pt. 698) 576; (2001) 2 NWLR (Pt. 698) 576

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE - Circumstantial Evidence - On the facts of the case - No coexisting circumstances exist - To whittle down the cogency - Of the circumstantial evidence led in the case (H3) Nweke v. State (2001) 2 KLR (pt. 115) 501; (2001) 4 NWLR (Pt. 704) 588

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE - Common intention - Being armed with a gun - For an illegal operation - Shows a common intention to use force - If necessary to effect the common design (H8) Alarape v. State (2001) 2 KLR (pt. 116) 543; (2001) 5 NWLR (Pt. 705) 79

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE - Common Intention - Once established - All involved parties are responsible for any offence - Which is a probable consequence of the execution of their common intention (H7) Alarape v. State (2001) 2 KLR (pt. 116) 543; (2001) 5 NWLR (Pt. 705) 79

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE - Confessional statement - If resiled or denied - Is not ipso facto inadmissible (H1) Alarape v. State (2001) 2 KLR (pt. 116) 543; (2001) 5 NWLR (Pt. 705) 79


INDEX OF SUBJECT MATTER ALL SC 2001 DECISIONS

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE - Confessional statement - Is sufficient to ground and support conviction - Without corroboration - If court is satisfied of its truth (H2) Alarape v. State (2001) 2 KLR (pt. 116) 543; (2001) 5 NWLR (Pt. 705) 79

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE - Confessional statement - Resiled from - Such statements must be considered - Along with other evidence - Before deciding whether or not - The statement was made (H3) Hassan v. State (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 127) 2789; (2001) 15 NWLR (Pt. 735) 184

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE - Confessional statement - Resiled from - The trial judge rightly decided - That the accused made the statement - After meticulously considering it - Along side other evidence (H4) Hassan v. State (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 127) 2789; (2001) 15 NWLR (Pt. 735) 184

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE - Confessional statement - Test for its veracity - Is by seeking any other evidence - That makes its truth probable (H3) Alarape v. State (2001) 2 KLR (pt. 116) 543; (2001) 5 NWLR (Pt. 705) 79

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE - Confessional statements - Conviction - An accused can be convicted - On his confessions alone - When certain conditions are met - Even if the confession is retracted (H1) Hassan v. State (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 127) 2789; (2001) 15 NWLR (Pt. 735) 184

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE - Confessions - Failure of trial court - The Court of Appeal rightly relied on the confessions - Though the trial court did not do so - Due to a misapplication of the law (H8) Akpan v. State (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 127) 2767; (2001) 15 NWLR (Pt. 737) 745

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE - Contradiction - Complained of - Is an inconsequential discrepancy rightly overlooked by the court of Appeal (H10) Oduneye v. State (2001) 1 KLR (pt. 114) 355; (2001) 2


INDEX OF SUBJECT MATTER ALL SC 2001 DECISIONS

NWLR (Pt. 697) 311

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE - Contradictions in evidence - For the contradiction to affect the decision of court - It must be material and fundamental in the determination of guilt (H6) Awopejo v. State (2001) 12 KLR (pt. 131) 3579; (2001) 18 NWLR (Pt. 745) 430

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE - Contradictions - Only contradictions that go to the substance & materiality of facts or facts in issue - Are fatal to the prosecutions case (H9) Oduneye v. State (2001) 1 KLR (pt. 114) 355; (2001) 2 NWLR (Pt. 697) 311

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE - Conviction - Based on circumstantial evidence - Is permitted - But the evidence relied on must be narrowly considered (H5) Ijioffor v. State (2001) 4 KLR (pt. 120) 1345; (2001) 9 NWLR (Pt. 718) 371

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE - Conviction for lesser offence - Homicide - Though not established - Appellant is guilty of causing hurt by dangerous means s. 248(1) PC (H6) Ahmed v. State (2001) 12 KLR (pt. 130) 33; (2001) 18 NWLR (Pt. 746) 622

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE - Evidence - Confession - Trial within trial - Burden of proof shifts to the accused - Only if he alleges some irregularity within his knowledge (H2) Emeka v. State (2001) 6 KLR (pt. 125) 2189; (2001) 14 NWLR (Pt. 734) 666

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE - Evidence - Confessional statement - Admissibility - Denial of making a confessional statement by an accused person - Is not sufficient ground to reject its admissibility in evidence (H1) Madjemu v. State (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 121) 1411; (2001) 9 NWLR (Pt. 718) 349

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE - Evidence - Confessional statement - Retraction - Where an accused is merely disputing the correctness of contents of the written statement - It is not necessary to have a trial within trial (H2) Madjemu v. State (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 121) 1411;


INDEX OF SUBJECT MATTER ALL SC 2001 DECISIONS

(2001) 9 NWLR (Pt. 718) 349

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE - Evidence - Defence of insanity - Proof - An accused who seeks to avail himself of the defence - What he must prove to succeed (H4) Madjemu v. State (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 121) 1411; (2001) 9 NWLR (Pt. 718) 349

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE - Evidence - Murder - Voluntary statement of appellant implicated him in the murder - But cannot incriminate his co-accused - In the absence of corroboration (H1) Emeka v. State (2001) 6 KLR (pt. 125) 2189; (2001) 14 NWLR (Pt. 734) 666

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE - Evidence - Witnesses - Prosecution must call any material or indispensable witness even if not favourable to its case - Or if not raise a doubt which must be resolved in favour of the defence (H7) Oduneye v. State (2001) 1 KLR (pt. 114) 355; (2001) 2 NWLR (Pt. 697) 311

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE - Expert Evidence - Opinion evidence - Is rightly rejected if it is inconsistent with the evidence at trial (H2) Nweke v. State (2001) 2 KLR (pt. 115) 501; (2001) 4 NWLR (Pt. 704) 588

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE - Extra judicial statements - Error of lower court in considering them - Cannot vitiate a judgment unless miscarriage of justice is occasioned thereby (H9) State v. Ogbunbunjo (2001) 1 KLR (pt. 114) 221; (2001) 2 NWLR (Pt. 698) 576

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE - Extra judicial statements - Not tendered and admitted in evidence at trial - Was wrongly considered (H7) State v. Ogbunbunjo (2001) 1 KLR (pt. 114) 221; (2001) 2 NWLR (Pt. 698) 576

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE - Extra judicial statements - Inconsistency Rule - As enunciated in the cases - Does not apply to retracted extra judicial confessions - But applies to extra judicial statements which are not confessions (H4) Akpan v. State (200) 7 KLR (pt. 127) 2767; (2001) 15 NWLR (Pt. 737) 745


INDEX OF SUBJECT MATTER ALL SC 2001 DECISIONS

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE - Homicide - Conviction - Proof beyond reasonable doubt Where not established Mere speculation or suspicion - Cannot ground conviction (H5) Ahmed v. State (2001) 12 KLR (pt. 130) 33; (2001) 18 NWLR (Pt. 746) 622

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE - Identification evidence - Was rightly discountenanced by the trial judge - As the witness failed to identify appellant - In her earlier statement to the police (H1) Udoebre v. State (2001) 6 KLR (pt. 124) 1945; (2001) 12 NWLR (Pt. 728) 617

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE - Identification - Murder - Where appellant did not contest - That PW1 knew him very well - Concurrent finding of fact on his identification - Will not be disturbed (H1) Olalekan v. State (2001) 12 KLR (pt. 130) 3401; (2001) 18 NWLR (Pt. 746) 793

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE - Interpreted document - Admissibility - Interpreter's testimony - That does not disclose questions asked and the language - Makes the document inadmissible (H3) Olalekan v. State (2001) 12 KLR (pt. 130) 3401; (2001) 18 NWLR (Pt. 746) 793

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE - Interpreter - Of appellant's Statement - Should give detailed evidence - To avoid making the recorded statement hearsay (H2) Olalekan v. State (2001) 12 KLR (pt. 130) 3401; (2001) 18 NWLR (Pt. 746) 793

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE - Joint trial - Evidence - As the evidence of the 4th accused - Which led to his acquittal - Was different from that of the other accused persons - Their conviction was proper (H10) Udoebre v. State (2001) 6 KLR (pt. 124) 1945; (2001) 12 NWLR (Pt. 728) 617

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE - Murder - Cause of death - Proof - By Medical evidence - Is not essential in certain circumstances (H10) Alarape v. State (2001) 2 KLR (pt. 116) 543; (2001) 5 NWLR (Pt.


INDEX OF SUBJECT MATTER ALL SC 2001 DECISIONS

705) 79

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE - Murder - Conviction - Burden of proof - There must be proof beyond reasonable doubt - For conviction to stand (H10) State v. Ogbubunjo (2001) 1 KLR (pt. 114) 221; (2001) 2 NWLR (Pt. 698) 576

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE - Murder - Conviction - Can be based on circumstantial evidence - In the absence of eye witnesses (H11) Udoebre v. State (2001) 6 KLR (pt. 124) 1945; (2001) 12 NWLR (Pt. 728) 617

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE - Murder - Identification of corpse - Will be sustained despite error in witness's testimony - If sufficient identification is established - And there is no miscarriage of justice (H4) Nweke v. State (2001) 2 KLR (pt. 115) 501; (2001) 4 NWLR (Pt. 704) 588

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE - Murder - Identification of deceased - Where the identity of the deceased can be inferred from the circumstances of the case - There is no need to call the person who identified the corpse to the doctor - As witness (H1) Awopejo v. State (2001) 12 KLR (pt. 131) 3579; (2001) 18 NWLR (Pt. 745) 430

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE - Murder - Medical evidence - Absence of -Nature of injury and instantaneous death - Absence of the corpus delicti - Are circumstances that may lead to the inference of murder - Without medical evidence (H3) Ahmed v. State (2001) 12 KLR (pt. 130) 33; (2001) 18 NWLR (Pt. 746) 622

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE - Murder - Medical evidence - Where necessary - Identity of the corpse must be certain - As any doubt will defeat prosecutor's case (H3) Amayo v. State (2001) 12 KLR (pt. 130) 3551; (2001) 18 NWLR (Pt. 745) 251

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE - Murder - Proof - Injury - Reliance on without medical evidence - Depends on surrounding circumstances -


INDEX OF SUBJECT MATTER ALL SC 2001 DECISIONS

And clear description of the injury (H4) Ahmed v. State (2001) 12 KLR (pt. 130) 33; (2001) 18 NWLR (Pt. 746) 622

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE - Onus of proof - For the prosecution is proof beyond reasonable doubt - And for accused preponderance of probability to exculpate herself from the accusation (H4) Psychiatric Hospitals Board v. Edosa (2001) 2 KLR (pt. 116) 3531; (2001) 5 NWLR (Pt. 707) 612

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE - Plea - Non compliance with the provisions of the law - As to plea taking - Will vitiated a trial and render it null and void (H2) Tobby v. State (2001) 4 KLR (pt. 119) 1137; (2001) 10 NWLR (Pt. 720) 23

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE - Plea - Requirements of a valid plea - Must be strictly complied with - In criminal trials (H1) Tobby v. State (2001) 4 KLR (pt. 119) 1137; (2001) 10 NWLR (Pt. 720) 23

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE - Proof - Beyond reasonable doubt - Where the evidence against each of the accused persons is overwhelming - And there is no special ground which would establish any doubt as to their guilt - The prosecution has proved its case beyond reasonable doubt (H4) Odu v. State (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 122) 1551; (2001) 10 NWLR (Pt. 722) 668

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE - Proof - Beyond reasonable doubt - Circumstantial evidence - Conviction based on circumstantial evidence - Is proof beyond reasonable doubt in this case (H8) Ijioffor v. State (2001) 4 KLR (pt. 120) 1345; (2001) 9 NWLR (Pt. 718) 371

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE - Rape - Penetration - No matter how slight is sufficient to constitute the offence - And if not proved - The prosecution must fail (H10) Iko v. State (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 126) 2419; (2001) 14 NWLR (Pt. 732) 221

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE - Retrial - Where trial of the appellant was nullified - Proper order to make is for a fresh trial (H2) Rufai v. State


INDEX OF SUBJECT MATTER ALL SC 2001 DECISIONS

(2001) 7 KLR (pt. 128) 2981; (2001) 13 NWLR (Pt. 731) 719

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE - Witnesses - As conviction can be based on evidence of a sole witness - The prosecution is not required to call every eye witness to the offence - Even when they are described as material witnesses (H6) Oduneye v. State (2001) 1 KLR (pt. 114) 355; (2001) 2 NWLR (Pt. 697) 311

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE - Witnesses - Material or indispensable witness - A person does not become such a witness - If there is no nexus and if his evidence would not be helpful - In getting at the truth (H8) Oduneye v. State (2001) 1 KLR (pt. 114) 355; (2001) 2 NWLR (Pt. 697) 311

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE - Witnesses - Prosecution's duty - Lies in calling such witnesses - Required to establish the case (H7) Ijioffor v. State (2001) 4 KLR (pt. 120) 1345; (2001) 9 NWLR (Pt. 718) 371

CROSS EXAMINATION - Absence of pleading - Company meeting minutes - As the issue was not pleaded - But merely arose in cross examination - It goes to no issue (H3) Nsirim v. Onuma Construction Co. Ltd. (2001) 3 KLR (pt. 118) 853; (2001) 7 NWLR (Pt. 713) 742

CROSS EXAMINATION - Pleadings - Evidence - Which is not material - To any issue raised by the pleading - May be disregarded - Even though obtained in cross examination (H2) Kayode v. Odutola (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 123) 1861; (2001) 11 NWLR (Pt. 725) 659

CROSS EXAMINATION - Pleadings - The admission obtained - From the defendant during cross examination - Went to negative his own pleaded fact - And was therefore admissible - Though not pleaded by the plaintiff (H3) Kayode v. Odutola (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 123) 1861; (2001) 11 NWLR (Pt. 725) 659

CUSTOMARY LAW - Arbitration - Customary arbitration - Conditions for a valid customary arbitration - Were not fulfilled in this case (H4) Odonigi v. Oyeleke (2001) 2 KLR (pt. 116) 625; (2001) 6


INDEX OF SUBJECT MATTER ALL SC 2001 DECISIONS

NWLR (Pt. 708) 12

CUSTOMARY LAW - Arbitration - Customary arbitration - Validity of - Ingredients that must be pleaded and proved (H5) Eke v. Okwaranyia (2001) 4 KLR (pt. 120) 1181; (2001) 12 NWLR (Pt. 726) 181

CUSTOMARY LAW - Arbitration - Estoppel - Customary arbitrations are recognized as judicial proceedings - Capable of creating estoppel per rem judicatam - If some conditions are satisfied (H3) Odonigi v. Oyeleke (2001) 2 KLR (pt. 116) 625; (2001) 6 NWLR (Pt. 708) 12

CUSTOMARY LAW - Chieftaincy declaration - Which is registered - And made pursuant to the law - Is proof of the customary law - In relation to that chieftaincy (H4) Oyefolu v. Durosinmi (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 128) 2997; (2001) 16 NWLR (Pt. 738) 1

CUSTOMARY LAW - Courts - Actions - Representative action - Meaning of a representative - It must be apparent on the record - That the suit is defended on behalf of one's family (H3) Okukuje v. Akwido (2001) 1 KLR (pt. 113) 1; (2001) 3 NWLR (Pt. 700) 261

CUSTOMARY LAW - Customary arbitration - Submission to arbitration - Where a party submitted to arbitration - He is bound of the result of he arbitration (H2) Ekpe v. Oke (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 121) 1505; (2001) 10 NWLR (Pt. 721) 341

CUSTOMARY LAW - Customary court's decisions - Interpretation of - Focus should be on substance and not the form - And there should be no reliance on technicalities (H7) Odofin v. Oni (2001) 1 KLR (pt. 114) 303; (2001) 3 NWLR (Pt. 701) 488

CUSTOMARY LAW - Customary court's decisions - Interpretation of - Where restrictively interpreted - Breach of guidelines - Judgment should be reversed (H8) Odofin v. Oni (2001) 1 KLR (pt. 114) 303; (2001) 3 NWLR (Pt. 701) 488

CUSTOMARY LAW - Evidence - Consideration of - Having declared


INDEX OF SUBJECT MATTER ALL SC 2001 DECISIONS

the Exhibits of "no moment" for non registration - The trial judge adopted the right approach - In considering evidence of the relevant customary laws (H6) Jekpe v. Alokwe (2001) 4 KLR (pt. 119) 985; (2001) 8 NWLR (Pt. 715) 252

CUSTOMARY LAW - Grant of land - Acts of ownership over the land - Can only be exercised according to the terms of the grant (H3) Ekpe v. Oke (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 121) 1505; (2001) 10 NWLR (Pt. 721) 341

CUSTOMARY LAW - Grant of land - By the chief and head of the family - With the concurrence of principal members - Is valid (H2) Temile v. Awani (2001) 6 KLR (pt. 125) 2159; (2001) 12 NWLR (Pt. 728) 726

CUSTOMARY LAW - Joint tenancy - Joint acquisition of property - Subject to customary law - Does not create joint tenancy in the meaning in which the term is known at common law (H4) Obasohan v. Omorodion (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 128) 3015; (2001) 13 NWLR (Pt. 729) 206

CUSTOMARY LAW - Judicial notice - Notoriety of custom - Doctrine of priority under Bini customary law fulfils the condition (H1) Ojo v. Azama (2001) 1 KLR (pt. 113) 81; (2001) 4 NWLR (Pt. 702) 57

CUSTOMARY LAW - Land law - Customary tenancy - An absolute grant of land - Not limited by any condition - Is inconsistent with customary tenancy - As in this case (H3) Abimbola v. Abatan (2001) 4 KLR (pt. 120) 1149; (2001) 9 NWLR (Pt. 717) 66

CUSTOMARY LAW - Land law - Customary Tenancy - May be established - Without the payment of tribute (H2) Abimbola v. Abatan (2001) 4 KLR (pt. 120) 1149; (2001) 9 NWLR (Pt. 717) 66

CUSTOMARY LAW - Land law - Fresh suit - Declaration of title - Obtained in a Native Court suit without a plan - The plaintiff is entitled to now seek a declaration tied to a plan (H6) Ikeni v. Efamo


INDEX OF SUBJECT MATTER ALL SC 2001 DECISIONS

(2001) 5 KLR (pt. 122) 1603; (2001) 10 NWLR (Pt. 720) 1

CUSTOMARY LAW - Land law - Title - Where family land is involved - Plaintiff must trace his title to the family - To succeed in his action for declaration of title (H8) Temile v. Awani (2001) 6 KLR (pt. 125) 2159; (2001) 12 NWLR (Pt. 728) 726

CUSTOMARY LAW - Land subject to customary law - S. 63(2) of the Property and Conveyancing Law - And s. 5 (3) of the Administration of Estate Law - Do not apply to land subject to customary law (H3) Obasohan v. Omorodion (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 128) 3015; (2001) 13 NWLR (Pt. 729) 206

CUSTOMARY LAW - Land Use Act - Interpretation of s. 48 - The Act does not set aside existing laws - Including customary law and common law (H5) Obasohan v. Omorodion (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 128) 3015; (2001) 13 NWLR (Pt. 729) 206

CUSTOMARY LAW - Native custom - Kalabari native custom of `'Duein wari fafaa" - Was shown to exist by evidence - And was correctly interpreted (H5) Jack v. Whyte (2001) 3 KLR (pt. 118) 937; (2001) 6 NWLR (Pt. 709) 266

CUSTOMARY LAW - Native or customary courts - Procedure - Courts making use of such courts' decisions - Should allow some latitude in procedure - Provided substantial justice was done (H2) Duru v. Onwumelu (2001) 12 KLR (pt. 130) 3287; (2001) 18 NWLR (Pt. 746) 672

CUSTOMARY LAW - Proof of custom - Appeals - The plaintiff/respondents - Discharged the burden on them - To prove the relevant Itsekiri native law on which they relied (H5) Temile v. Awani (2001) 6 KLR (pt. 125) 2159; (2001) 12 NWLR (Pt. 728) 726

CUSTOMARY LAW - Proof of custom - Burden of proof - Is on the person alleging The existence of the custom - Where the custom is not judicially noticed (H4) Temile v. Awani (2001) 6 KLR (pt. 125)


INDEX OF SUBJECT MATTER ALL SC 2001 DECISIONS

2159; (2001) 12 NWLR (Pt. 728) 726

DAMAGES - Assessment - Appellate court - General principle - Approach of the appellate court to award of damages by the trial court - When the appellate court should exercise the power of review (H13) Offoboche v. Ogoja L.G. (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 128) 2843; (2001) 16 NWLR (Pt. 739) 458

DAMAGES - Assessment - Special and general damages - Principle in regard to the assessment and award of special damages - Differentiated from that of general damages (H11) Rockonoh Property Ltd. v. NITEL Plc. (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 128) 2871; (2001) 14 NWLR (Pt. 733) 468

DAMAGES - Awards - Evidence - Misdirection - It is a misdirection for a trial judge - To give judgment on an issue on which there is no evidence adduced (H6) KLR (pt. 129) 3037; (2001) 14 NWLR (Pt. 733) 468 v. KLR (pt. 129) 3037; (2001) 14 NWLR (Pt. 733) 468 (2001) 9/10

DAMAGES - Claim of a single award - For several causes of action - Where the respondents were liable for only a few of the libels proved - And not entirely for the same instances of libel - Separate awards are called for (H12) Offoboche v. Ogoja L.G. (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 128) 2843; (2001) 16 NWLR (Pt. 739) 458

DAMAGES - General Damages - Quantum - General damages are always made as a claim at large - The quantum need not be pleaded and proved (H1) Rockonoh Property Ltd. v. NITEL Plc. (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 128) 2871; (2001) 14 NWLR (Pt. 733) 468

DAMAGES - General damages - Trespass to land - When general damages are sought on the basis of trespass to land - They would represent payment for the tort of trespass - Not the value of the land (H2) Rockonoh Property Ltd. v. NITEL Plc. (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 128) 2871; (2001) 14 NWLR (Pt. 733) 468


INDEX OF SUBJECT MATTER ALL SC 2001 DECISIONS

DAMAGES - Interference - Appeal court may upset the award of damages - By trial court if a wrong principle of law was applied (H6) A.C.B. Ltd. v. Apugo (2001) 2 KLR (pt. 116) 653; (2001) 5 NWLR (Pt. 707) 483

DAMAGES - Libel - Assessment - Claim for non-pecuniary loss - Elements to be taken into account (H15) Offoboche v. Ogoja L.G. (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 128) 2843; (2001) 16 NWLR (Pt. 739) 458

DAMAGES - Libel - Claim for non-pecuniary loss - Rationale for the award of damages for injured reputation (H14) Offoboche v. Ogoja L.G. (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 128) 2843; (2001) 16 NWLR (Pt. 739) 458

DAMAGES - Libel - General damages - Is awarded as of right - Once a successful claim for libel has been established (H5) A.C.B. Ltd. v. Apugo (2001) 2 KLR (pt. 116) 653; (2001) 5 NWLR (Pt. 707) 483

DAMAGES - Libel - Success of the action before the Supreme Court - When erroneous excessive award of ten million naira - Will be reduced to N100,000.00 (H17) Offoboche v. Ogoja L.G. (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 128) 2843; (2001) 16 NWLR (Pt. 739) 458

DAMAGES - Negligence - Contributory negligence - The measure of damages - Is apportioned according to the proportion - Of responsibility of the parties for the damage (H3) Ololo v. Nig. Agip Oil (2001) 6 KLR (pt. 124) 2101; (2001) 13 NWLR (Pt. 729) 88

DAMAGES - Proof - Claim based on alleged agency relationship - Was not proved - Award of N12.1 million as special and general damages - Cannot stand (H3) Narindex Ltd. v. Inter-Continental Bank (2001) 4 KLR (pt. 120) 1321; (2001) 10 NWLR (Pt. 721) 321

DAMAGES - Reduction - Appeal court rightly reduced damages awarded by trial court - After careful consideration of circumstances of the case (H7) A.C.B. Ltd. v. Apugo (2001) 2 KLR (pt. 116) 653; (2001) 5 NWLR (Pt. 707) 483


INDEX OF SUBJECT MATTER ALL SC 2001 DECISIONS

DAMAGES - Special damages - Awarded by the trial judge - Was validly set aside - As it was not strictly proved by the plaintiff (H5) Ololo v. Nig. Agip Oil (2001) 6 KLR (pt. 124) 2101; (2001) 13 NWLR (Pt. 729) 88

DEFAMATION - Libel - Continuous publication - There is no concept of continuous publication in the law of defamation - Every publication and republication is complete in itself - In founding a cause of action (H1) Offoboche v. Ogoja L.G. (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 128) 2843; (2001) 16 NWLR (Pt. 739) 458

DEFAMATION - Libel - Damages - Assessment - Claim for non-pecuniary loss - Elements to be taken into account (H15) Offoboche v. Ogoja L.G. (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 128) 2843; (2001) 16 NWLR (Pt. 739) 458

DEFAMATION - Libel - Damages - Claim for non-pecuniary loss - Rationale for the award of damages for injured reputation (H14) Offoboche v. Ogoja L.G. (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 128) 2843; (2001) 16 NWLR (Pt. 739) 458

DEFAMATION - Libel or slander - Defamatory materials - Reading it out to an audience - That know it was written - Such publication is libel and not slander (H9) Offoboche v. Ogoja L.G. (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 128) 2843; (2001) 16 NWLR (Pt. 739) 458

DEFAMATION - Limitation - Public Officers Protection law s. 2(a) - Defamation - Action commenced within 3 months - Of the publication of the offending materials - Is not barred by that provision (H3) Offoboche v. Ogoja L.G. (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 128) 2843; (2001) 16 NWLR (Pt. 739) 458

DEFAMATION - Limitation - Qualified privilege - A person who claims that the action is statute-barred - Does not need to establish a defence of qualified privilege - In order to succeed in his plea (H7) Offoboche v. Ogoja L.G. (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 128) 2843; (2001) 16 NWLR (Pt. 739) 458


INDEX OF SUBJECT MATTER ALL SC 2001 DECISIONS

DEFAMATION - Qualified privilege - Pleading - Where a defendant raises a defence of privilege - He should as a matter of pleadings aver the facts on which the defence is based (H8) Offoboche v. Ogoja L.G. (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 128) 2843; (2001) 16 NWLR (Pt. 739) 458

DEFAMATION - Single publication - Cause of action - Pleading - A party who makes one single publication the foundation of his cause of action - Cannot extend the period of accrual of cause of action - Merely by pleading further publications (H2) Offoboche v. Ogoja L.G. (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 128) 2843; (2001) 16 NWLR (Pt. 739) 458

DEMURRER - Evidence - Is not to be introduced or looked at - In a demurrer proceeding - Only statement of claim should be considered (H2) Boothia Inc. v. Fareast Ltd. (2001) 4 KLR (pt. 119) 1107; (2001) 9 NWLR (Pt. 719) 572

DETINUE - Cause of action - Detinue - Though not established in the statement of claim - Yet a reasonable cause of action was disclosed (H3) Labode v. Otubu (2001) 3 KLR (pt. 117) 699; (2001) 7 NWLR (Pt. 712) 256

DETINUE - Tort - Detinue - Meaning of - Detention of the Chattel is wrongful - If the defendant's possession is adverse to the plaintiff's right (H1) Labode v. Otubu (2001) 3 KLR (pt. 117) 699; (2001) 7 NWLR (Pt. 712) 256

DOCUMENTS - Admissibility - Copy of a bank's statement of account - Appellant is estopped from contesting its admissibility - Having failed to object when it was admitted - Without fulfilling the conditions for its admissibility (H7) IBWA v. Imano Ltd. (2001) 3 KLR (pt. 118) 873

DOCUMENTS - Admissibility - Document - That is not tendered by any of the parties - But is a sketch made by trial court - Lower Court wrongfully rejected it as inadmissible (H1) Duru v. Onwumelu (2001) 12 KLR (pt. 130) 3287; (2001) 18 NWLR (Pt. 746) 672


INDEX OF SUBJECT MATTER ALL SC 2001 DECISIONS

DOCUMENTS - Contradiction - Oral evidence is admissible - To assist the court - In determining the probative value of a document (H3) Jack v. Whyte (2001) 3 KLR (pt. 118) 937; (2001) 6 NWLR (Pt. 709) 266

DOCUMENTS - Evidence - Copy of an entry in a bankers book - Is admissible - Once there is substantial compliance with s. 96(2)(2) of the Evidence Act (H2) IBWA v. Imano Ltd. (2001) 3 KLR (pt. 118) 873

DOCUMENTS - Exhibits - Relevance - An exhibit that is not relevant - In proving exclusive possession - Is worthless (H5) Duru v. Onwumelu (2001) 12 KLR (pt. 130) 3287; (2001) 18 NWLR (Pt. 746) 672

DOCUMENTS - Interpretation - Of Exhibit A by the court - Gives no power to the firm - To sell the property to any party - Who furnished the purchase price (H5) Incar Nig. Plc v. Bolex Enterprises (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 123) 1823; (2001) 12 NWLR (Pt. 728) 646; (2001) 12 NWLR (Pt. 728) 646

DOCUMENTS - Secondary evidence - Copy of an entry in a bankers book - Is admissible under certain conditions (H1) IBWA v. Imano Ltd. (2001) 3 KLR (pt. 118) 873

DOCUMENTS - Tendered and admitted by trial court - May be relied on to ascertain truth of a complaint by appellate court - Despite complaints as to its validity (H5) Psychiatric Hospitals Board v. Edosa (2001) 2 KLR (pt. 116) 3531; (2001) 5 NWLR (Pt. 707) 612

ELECTION PETITIONS - Appeal - Purported election appeal - Which in substance does not fall under s. 81 (3) of the Decree - Will not be deemed finalized - By the Court of Appeal (H4) Onuaguluchi v. Ndu (2001) 3 KLR (pt. 117) 831; (2001) 7 NWLR (Pt. 712) 309

ELECTION PETITIONS - Appeals - Finality of Court of Appeal's decision - As provided in s. 81 (1) and (3) of Decree No.5 of 1999 -


INDEX OF SUBJECT MATTER ALL SC 2001 DECISIONS

Makes the present appeal incompetent (H2) Onuaguluchi v. Ndu (2001) 3 KLR (pt. 117) 831; (2001) 7 NWLR (Pt. 712) 309

ELECTION PETITIONS - Wrong decision - Cannot be altered by the Supreme Court under any guise - Where the Constitution has made the Court of Appeal the final court (H3) Onuaguluchi v. Ndu (2001) 3 KLR (pt. 117) 831; (2001) 7 NWLR (Pt. 712) 309

EQUITY - Delay defeats equity - An action brought 15 years after cause of action accrued - Is defeated by the delay (H3) Igbinokpgie v. Ogedegbe (2001) 12 KLR (pt. 131) 3595; (2001) 18 NWLR (Pt. 745) 412

EQUITY - Equitable defences - Laches and acquiescence - Conduct that will amount to laches and acquiescence - Will be such that will be repugnant to equity and good conscience (H4) Ekpe v. Oke (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 121) 1505; (2001) 10 NWLR (Pt. 721) 341

EQUITY - Laches & acquiescence - Conditions that must exist - For the plea to be sustained - Were rightly enumerated by the trial judge - And appellant failed to satisfy these conditions (H8) Kayode v. Odutola (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 123) 1861; (2001) 11 NWLR (Pt. 725) 659

EQUITY - Laches & acquiescence - Land law - As the action of the appellant - In gaining possession of the disputed land - Was not bona fide - His equitable defences could not avail him (H6) Kayode v. Odutola (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 123) 1861; (2001) 11 NWLR (Pt. 725) 659

EQUITY - Laches & acquiescence - Land law - Title - Only a very high degree of acquiescence - And not mere lapse of time - Will lead to a loss of title by the original owner - In favour of an occupier - Which is not so in this case (H4) Kayode v. Odutola (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 123) 1861; (2001) 11 NWLR (Pt. 725) 659

EQUITY - Laches & acquiescence - Land law - Title - The acquies


INDEX OF SUBJECT MATTER ALL SC 2001 DECISIONS

cence complained of - Must be fraudulent - And the delay must be combined - With plaintiffs knowledge of his cause of action - For the plea to succeed (H5) Kayode v. Odutola (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 123) 1861; (2001) 11 NWLR (Pt. 725) 659

EQUITY - Laches & acquiescence - Title - The appellant could not have been mistaken - As to the true owner of the land - As the respondent's registered Deed - Served as a notice to him - And therefore his equitable defences must fail (H9) Kayode v. Odutola (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 123) 1861; (2001) 11 NWLR (Pt. 725) 659

EQUITY - Land Law - Title to land - Registration of an instrument - Is not notice to all the world - And as appellant's title was not proved - His equitable defences of acquiescence and laches - Ought to have been rejected (H1) Kayode v. Odutola (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 123) 1861; (2001) 11 NWLR (Pt. 725) 659

ESTOPPEL - Admission of liability by a party - That party is estopped from denying such admission (H8) Bank of the North v. Yau (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 122) 1561; (2001) 10 NWLR (Pt. 721) 408

ESTOPPEL - Arbitration - Customary arbitrations are recognized as judicial proceedings - Capable of creating estoppel per rem judicatam - If some conditions are satisfied (H3) Odonigi v. Oyeleke (2001) 2 KLR (pt. 116) 625; (2001) 6 NWLR (Pt. 708) 12

ESTOPPEL - Cause of action estoppel - Defence of - What the defence connotes (H2) Ikeni v. Efamo (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 122) 1603; (2001) 10 NWLR (Pt. 720) 1

ESTOPPEL - Cause of action estoppel - How it arises (H1) Ikeni v. Efamo (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 122) 1603; (2001) 10 NWLR (Pt. 720) 1

ESTOPPEL - Cause of action estoppel - When raised - Normally the cause of action estoppel is raised as a defence to the Plaintiff's action (H1) Adone v. Ikebudu (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 126) 2363; (2001) 14 NWLR (Pt. 733) 385


INDEX OF SUBJECT MATTER ALL SC 2001 DECISIONS

ESTOPPEL - Constitution of - To constitute estoppel - The parties subject matter and issue - Must be the same (H1) Biariko v. Edeh-Ogwuile (2001) 4 KLR (pt. 120) 1213; (2001) 12 NWLR (Pt. 726) 235

ESTOPPEL - Issue estoppel - Identity of parties - Where there are several parties in the previous suit - It is sufficient that those of the parties who were necessary parties to the issue in the previous suit - Are the same as in the latter suit (H9) Ikeni v. Efamo (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 122) 1603; (2001) 10 NWLR (Pt. 720) 1

ESTOPPEL - Issue estoppel - Requirements - What is required for the doctrine to be applicable (H5) Ikeni v. Efamo (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 122) 1603; (2001) 10 NWLR (Pt. 720) 1

ESTOPPEL - Issue estoppel - Where a plea of cause of action estoppel cannot be raised - A party can still plead that the other party is precluded from contending the contrary of any precise point - Which has once been distinctly put in issue - And determined directly and distinctly in the first action (H3) Ikeni v. Efamo (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 122) 1603; (2001) 10 NWLR (Pt. 720) 1

ESTOPPEL - Jurisdiction - Native court - Estoppel - The procedure adopted by the native court - Was in excess of jurisdiction - And its judgment was null - And cannot support an estoppel (H7) Achiakpa v. Nduka (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 126) 2487; (2001) 14 NWLR (Pt. 734) 623

ESTOPPEL - Meaning - Statutory provision - Of a public nature - Cannot be compromised by estoppel - Any decision contrary to such provision - Is a nullity (H4) Menakaya v. Menakaya (2001) 9/10 KLR (pt. 129) 3037; (2001) 16 NWLR (Pt. 738) 203

ESTOPPEL - Nature and effect - Of admissions and the plea of estoppel (H7) Bank of the North v. Yau (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 122) 1561; (2001) 10 NWLR (Pt. 721) 408


INDEX OF SUBJECT MATTER ALL SC 2001 DECISIONS

ESTOPPEL - Pleadings - Res judicata - Must be specifically pleaded - And not casually pleaded (H3) Achiakpa v. Nduka (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 126) 2487; (2001) 14 NWLR (Pt. 734) 623

ESTOPPEL - Proof - Issue of fact - Where not sufficiently proved - The issue must be resolved against the party - On whom the burden of proof lies (H4) Adone v. Ikebudu (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 126) 2363; (2001) 14 NWLR (Pt. 733) 385

ESTOPPEL - Res judicata - Issue estoppel - Proper place for a Plaintiff to raise the question - Is in the reply to the statement of defence - But where raised in the statement of claim - It should be with particularity (H2) Adone v. Ikebudu (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 126) 2363; (2001) 14 NWLR (Pt. 733) 385

ESTOPPEL - Res judicata - Nature - It is a shield not a sword - And cannot avail the plaintiff but the defendant (H1) Achiakpa v. Nduka (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 126) 2487; (2001) 14 NWLR (Pt. 734) 623

ESTOPPEL - Res judicata - Previous judgment - May be pleaded by a plaintiff - As mere estoppel not as estoppel per rem judicatam (H2) Achiakpa v. Nduka (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 126) 2487; (2001) 14 NWLR (Pt. 734) 623

ESTOPPEL - Res judicata - Subject matter of the 1st suit - And the present suit are not the same - As the 1st relates to only part of the land - While this relates to the whole land (H8) Achiakpa v. Nduka (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 126) 2487; (2001) 14 NWLR (Pt. 734) 623

ESTOPPEL - Res judicata - What a party must prove - To succeed in this defence (H4) Achiakpa v. Nduka (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 126) 2487; (2001) 14 NWLR (Pt. 734) 623

ESTOPPEL - Res judicata or issue estoppel - The judgment in a criminal case relied on - Cannot create estoppel - Because the parties and the issues - Are not the same in both actions (H5) Odonigi v. Oyeleke


INDEX OF SUBJECT MATTER ALL SC 2001 DECISIONS

(2001) 2 KLR (pt. 116) 625; (2001) 6 NWLR (Pt. 708) 12

ESTOPPEL - Standing by - Person who failed to defend his interest - At time of litigation - Cannot reopen what was decided (H4) Duru v. Onwumelu (2001) 12 KLR (pt. 130) 3287; (2001) 18 NWLR (Pt. 746) 672

ESTOPPEL - Standing by doctrine - Is what is applicable in this case - And not res judicata (H3) Duru v. Onwumelu (2001) 12 KLR (pt. 130) 3287; (2001) 18 NWLR (Pt. 746) 672

ESTOPPEL - Statements - Which have been acted upon by another to his detriment - In the belief that the statements were true - The maker thereof is absolutely estopped to contradict or deny the truth of such statements (H6) Bank of the North v. Yau (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 122) 1561; (2001) 10 NWLR (Pt. 721) 408

EVIDENCE - Admissibility - Appeals - Wrongful admission of evidence - Shall not of itself be a ground for the reversal of a decision - Where the evidence cannot be held to have affected the decision (H11) Ojengbede v. Esan (2001) 12 KLR (pt. 131) 3531; (2001) 18 NWLR (Pt. 746) 771

EVIDENCE - Admissibility - Document - That is not tendered by any of the parties - But is a sketch made by trial court - Lower Court wrongfully rejected it as inadmissible (H1) Duru v. Onwumelu (2001) 12 KLR (pt. 130) 3287; (2001) 18 NWLR (Pt. 746) 672

EVIDENCE - Admissibility - Failure to object to admissibility of a document - Where conditions for its admissibility have not been established - Defendant will be barred from complaining on appeal (H6) IBWA v. Imano Ltd. (2001) 3 KLR (pt. 118) 873

EVIDENCE - Admissibility - Secondary evidence - Of entries in bank ledger - Will be admitted upon substantial compliance with S.972(e) Evidence Act (H4) Narindex Ltd. v. Inter-Continental Bank (2001) 4 KLR (pt. 120) 1321; (2001) 10 NWLR (Pt. 721) 321


INDEX OF SUBJECT MATTER ALL SC 2001 DECISIONS

EVIDENCE - Admissibility - Survey plan which is not prepared by a qualified surveyor - Is inadmissible - For failure to comply with s.3 Survey Law of Ondo State (H2) Babatola v. Aladejana (2001) 6 KLR (pt. 124) 2141; (2001) 12 NWLR (Pt. 728) 597

EVIDENCE - Admission - Though what is admitted needs no proof - But where it is based on misapprehension - Court has the discretion to require its proof (H1) Narindex Ltd. v. Inter-Continental Bank (2001) 4 KLR (pt. 120) 1321; (2001) 10 NWLR (Pt. 721) 321

EVIDENCE - Admission per se - Do not constitute conclusive evidence - Trial court should have called for further evidence - In the circumstances of this case (H2) Narindex Ltd. v. Inter-Continental Bank (2001) 4 KLR (pt. 120) 1321; (2001) 10 NWLR (Pt. 721) 321

EVIDENCE - Affidavit - Containing diametrically opposing material facts - Must be resolved by viva voce evidence - Not by picking and choosing which to believe (H1) First Bank v. May Medical Clinics (2001) 4 KLR (pt. 120) 1023; (2001) 9 NWLR (Pt. 717) 28

EVIDENCE - Affidavit - Extraneous paragraphs in contravention of section 87 of the Evidence Act - Should be struck out (H3) Bamaiyi v. State (2001) 4 KLR (pt. 119) 1043; (2001) 8 NWLR (Pt. 715) 270

EVIDENCE - Affidavits - Resolving conflicts in affidavits - The principle laid down in Falobi v. Falobi - Applies to a variety of proceedings - And is not restricted (H1) Chairman N.P.C. v. Chairman Ikere LG.A (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 128) 2805; (2001) 13 NWLR (Pt. 731) 540

EVIDENCE - Affidavits - Whether a case may be heard entirely on affidavit evidence or not - Is determined by the nature of the issues - Whether they are of contentious facts or not (H2) Chairman N.P.C. v. Chairman Ikere LG.A (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 128) 2805; (2001) 13 NWLR (Pt. 731) 540

EVIDENCE - Alibi - Onus - Of establishing the defence - Is on the


INDEX OF SUBJECT MATTER ALL SC 2001 DECISIONS

accused - Even if the police has failed to investigate the observation (H2) Odu v. State (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 122) 1551; (2001) 10 NWLR (Pt. 722) 668

EVIDENCE - Appeal - Hearsay evidence - Conviction based on hearsay evidence - Appellate court may quash such conviction - In the absence of other evidence (H4) Ijioffor v. State (2001) 4 KLR (pt. 120) 1345; (2001) 9 NWLR (Pt. 718) 371

EVIDENCE - Appeals - Evaluation of evidence - Where not properly done before upholding trial courts finding - Supreme Court will set aside the judgment (H7) Basil v. Fajebe (2001) 4 KLR (pt. 120) 1273; (2001) 11 NWLR (Pt. 725) 592

EVIDENCE - Appeals - Reevaluation of evidence - Was rightly declined - As they were not proved to be perverse (H3) Abidoye v. Alawode (2001) 3 KLR (pt. 118) 917; (2001) 6 NWLR (Pt. 709) 463

EVIDENCE - Appeals - Revaluation - In the absence of a challenge by the adverse party - As to the credibility of the evidence - The court of Appeal and the supreme court cannot castigate its credibility (H2) Oduneye v. State (2001) 1 KLR (pt. 114) 355; (2001) 2 NWLR (Pt. 697) 311

EVIDENCE - Arbitration - Customary arbitration - Validity of - Ingredients that must be pleaded and proved (H5) Eke v. Okwaranyia (2001) 4 KLR (pt. 120) 1181; (2001) 12 NWLR (Pt. 726) 181

EVIDENCE - Awards - Evidence - Misdirection - It is a misdirection for a trial judge - To give judgment on an issue on which there is no evidence adduced (H6) Menakaya v. Menakaya (2001) 9/10 KLR (pt. 129) 3037; (2001) 16 NWLR (Pt. 738) 203

EVIDENCE - Burden of proof - Admission of guilt - Where there is an admission of guilt - The question of establishing the legal burden of proof no longer arises (H5) Dongtoe v. Civil Service Commission


INDEX OF SUBJECT MATTER ALL SC 2001 DECISIONS

Plateau State (2001) 4 KLR (pt. 120) 1239; (2001) 9 NWLR (Pt. 717) 132

EVIDENCE - Burden of proof - In civil cases - Rests on the party who affirms the issue - As settled by the pleadings - And must not be departed from without reasons (H4) Jack v. Whyte (2001) 3 KLR (pt. 118) 937; (2001) 6 NWLR (Pt. 709) 266

EVIDENCE - Burden of proof - Lies without exception on the prosecution - To prove the offence beyond reasonable doubt (H5) Oduneye v. State (2001) 1 KLR (pt. 114) 355; (2001) 2 NWLR (Pt. 697) 311

EVIDENCE - Circumstantial evidence - Conviction - Based on circumstantial evidence - Is permitted - But the evidence relied on must be narrowly considered (H5) Ijioffor v. State (2001) 4 KLR (pt. 120) 1345; (2001) 9 NWLR (Pt. 718) 371

EVIDENCE - Circumstantial evidence - Conviction - What must be established - Before circumstantial evidence can sustain the conviction of an accused (H6) Ijioffor v. State (2001) 4 KLR (pt. 120) 1345; (2001) 9 NWLR (Pt. 718) 371

EVIDENCE - Circumstantial evidence - In the absence of suitable explanation from the appellants - The only irresistible inference - From the surrounding circumstances - Is that they killed the deceased (H13) Udoebre v. State (2001) 6 KLR (pt. 124) 1945; (2001) 12 NWLR (Pt. 728) 617

EVIDENCE - Circumstantial Evidence - Must be positive compelling and irresistible - Leading to a conclusion that the accused is guilty - In order to ground a conviction (H9) Akpan v. State (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 127) 2767; (2001) 15 NWLR (Pt. 737) 745

EVIDENCE - Circumstantial Evidence - On the facts of the case - No coexisting circumstances exist - To whittle down the cogency - Of the circumstantial evidence led in the case (H3) Nweke v. State (2001) 2


INDEX OF SUBJECT MATTER ALL SC 2001 DECISIONS

KLR (pt. 115) 501; (2001) 4 NWLR (Pt. 704) 588

EVIDENCE - Circumstantial Evidence - There is conclusive and compelling evidence - Of the guilt of the accused in this case (H10) Akpan v. State (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 127) 2767; (2001) 15 NWLR (Pt. 737) 745

EVIDENCE - Circumstantial evidence - Whether the circumstantial evidence is consistent with the guilt of the accused - Is determined by surrounding circumstances (H12) Udoebre v. State (2001) 6 KLR (pt. 124) 1945; (2001) 12 NWLR (Pt. 728) 617

EVIDENCE - Common intention - Its proof may be inferred - From circumstances described in the evidence - And not only from the express agreement of the accused persons (H5) Alarape v. State (2001) 2 KLR (pt. 116) 543; (2001) 5 NWLR (Pt. 705) 79

EVIDENCE - Confession - Trial within trial - Burden of proof shifts to the accused - Only if he alleges some irregularity within his knowledge (H2) Emeka v. State (2001) 6 KLR (pt. 125) 2189; (2001) 14 NWLR (Pt. 734) 666

EVIDENCE - Confessional statement - Admissibility - Denial of making a confessional statement by an accused person - Is not sufficient ground to reject its admissibility in evidence (H1) Madjemu v. State (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 121) 1411; (2001) 9 NWLR (Pt. 718) 349

EVIDENCE - Confessional statement - If resiled or denied - Is not ipso facto inadmissible (H1) Alarape v. State (2001) 2 KLR (pt. 116) 543; (2001) 5 NWLR (Pt. 705) 79

EVIDENCE - Confessional statement - Is sufficient to ground and support conviction - Without corroboration - If court is satisfied of its truth (H2) Alarape v. State (2001) 2 KLR (pt. 116) 543; (2001) 5 NWLR (Pt. 705) 79

EVIDENCE - Confessional statement - Objection to its voluntariness


INDEX OF SUBJECT MATTER ALL SC 2001 DECISIONS

- Should be raised at the time it is sought to be tendered - And not as an after thought (H4) Alarape v. State (2001) 2 KLR (pt. 116) 543; (2001) 5 NWLR (Pt. 705) 79

EVIDENCE - Confessional statement - Retraction - Where an accused is merely disputing the correctness of contents of the written statement - It is not necessary to have a trial within trial (H2) Madjemu v. State (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 121) 1411; (2001) 9 NWLR (Pt. 718) 349

EVIDENCE - Confessional statement - S. 27(1) Evidence Act - When a statement is said to be confessional (H2) Hassan v. State (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 127) 2789; (2001) 15 NWLR (Pt. 735) 184

EVIDENCE - Confessional statement - Test for its veracity - Is by seeking any other evidence - That makes its truth probable (H3) Alarape v. State (2001) 2 KLR (pt. 116) 543; (2001) 5 NWLR (Pt. 705) 79

EVIDENCE - Confessional statements - Resiled from - The trial judge rightly decided - That the accused made the statement - After meticulously considering it - Alongside other evidence (H4) Hassan v. State (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 127) 2789; (2001) 15 NWLR (Pt. 735) 184

EVIDENCE - Confessional statements - Conviction - An accused can be convicted - On his confessions alone - When certain conditions are met - Even if the confession is retracted (H1) Hassan v. State (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 127) 2789; (2001) 15 NWLR (Pt. 735) 184

EVIDENCE - Confessions - An incriminating admission - Short of full confession - Is covered by s.27(1) Evidence Act - And is admissible (H5) Akpan v. State (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 127) 2767; (2001) 15 NWLR (Pt. 737) 745

EVIDENCE - Confessions - Once a confession is admitted - The court must determine its probative value - And act upon it - Even if it has been retracted (H6) Akpan v. State (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 127) 2767; (2001) 15 NWLR (Pt. 737) 745


INDEX OF SUBJECT MATTER ALL SC 2001 DECISIONS

EVIDENCE - Confessions - The appeal court rightly acted on the confessions - As other evidence made its truth probable - As far as can be tested (H7) Akpan v. State (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 127) 2767; (2001) 15 NWLR (Pt. 737) 745

EVIDENCE - Consideration of - Having rightly declared the Exhibits of `'no moment'' for non registration - The trial judge adopted the right approach - In considering evidence of the relevant customary laws (H6) Jekpe v. Alokwe (2001) 4 KLR (pt. 120) 985; (2001) 8 NWLR (Pt. 715) 252

EVIDENCE - Contradiction - Complained of - Is an inconsequential discrepancy rightly overlooked by the court of Appeal (H10) Oduneye v. State (2001) 1 KLR (pt. 114) 355; (2001) 2 NWLR (Pt. 697) 311

EVIDENCE - Contradictions - Only contradictions that go to the substance & materiality of facts or facts in issue - Are fatal to the prosecutions case (H9) Oduneye v. State (2001) 1 KLR (pt. 114) 355; (2001) 2 NWLR (Pt. 697) 311

EVIDENCE - Conveyancing - Exhibit - From the evidence in this case - The land in dispute was not within the land conveyed (H1) Basil v. Fajebe (2001) 4 KLR (pt. 120) 1273; (2001) 11 NWLR (Pt. 725) 592

EVIDENCE - Corroboration - Classes of criminal cases - In which corroboration is required (H7) Iko v. State (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 126) 2419; (2001) 14 NWLR (Pt. 732) 221

EVIDENCE - Corroboration - Essential characteristics of good corroborative evidence (H6) Iko v. State (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 126) 2419; (2001) 14 NWLR (Pt. 732) 221

EVIDENCE - Corroboration - Interested persons - Relationship by blood per se - Is not sufficient to disqualify the evidence of a witness (H1) Akpan v. State (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 127) 2767; (2001) 15 NWLR


INDEX OF SUBJECT MATTER ALL SC 2001 DECISIONS

(Pt. 737) 745

EVIDENCE - Corroboration - Meaning of corroboration (H5) Iko v. State (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 126) 2419; (2001) 14 NWLR (Pt. 732) 221

EVIDENCE - Corroboration - Rape - The finding of corroboration by the trial court - Was wrongly affirmed - As the items of corroboration listed by the trial court - Does not amount to corroboration of rape (H9) Iko v. State (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 126) 2419; (2001) 14 NWLR (Pt. 732) 221

EVIDENCE - Corroboration - Sexual offences - Corroboration in such cases are not mandatory - But expedient in practice - As the trial court rightly held (H8) Iko v. State (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 126) 2419; (2001) 14 NWLR (Pt. 732) 221

EVIDENCE - Courts - Evidence of relevant facts - Should not be ignored in deciding the probability of a question of fact - Lest public confidence in judicial process be severely eroded (H6) Basil v. Fajebe (2001) 4 KLR (pt. 120) 1273; (2001) 11 NWLR (Pt. 725) 592

EVIDENCE - Credibility of PW1 - Was affected by his shameless lying - And the trial judge should not have believed him (H6) Incar Nig. Plc v. Bolex Enterprises (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 123) 1823; (2001) 12 NWLR (Pt. 728) 646; (2001) 12 NWLR (Pt. 728) 646

EVIDENCE - Criminal procedure - Alibi - Proof - Once the plaintiff has furnished information of his whereabouts - The burden shifts to the prosecution to disprove the defence (H9) Udoebre v. State (2001) 6 KLR (pt. 124) 1945; (2001) 12 NWLR (Pt. 728) 617

EVIDENCE - Criminal Procedure - Circumstantial evidence - In the absence of any satisfactory explanation - To the evidence led at trial - The trial judge was justified - In inferring the existence of a guilty intent - And returning a finding of guilty - Based on the circumstantial evidence (H8) Adeniji v. State (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 123) 1799; (2001) 13 NWLR (Pt. 730) 375


INDEX OF SUBJECT MATTER ALL SC 2001 DECISIONS

EVIDENCE - Criminal trial - Onus of proof - For the prosecution is proof beyond reasonable doubt - And for accused preponderance of probability to exculpate herself from the accusation (H4) Psychiatric Hospitals Board v. Edosa (2001) 2 KLR (pt. 116) 3531; (2001) 5 NWLR (Pt. 707) 612

EVIDENCE - Customary law - Proof of custom - Burden of proof - Is on the person alleging The existence of the custom - Where the custom is not judicially noticed (H4) Temile v. Awani (2001) 6 KLR (pt. 125) 2159; (2001) 12 NWLR (Pt. 728) 726

EVIDENCE - Damages - General Damages - Quantum - General damages are always made as a claim at large - The quantum need not be pleaded and proved (H1) Rockonoh Property Ltd. v. NITEL Plc. (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 128) 2871; (2001) 14 NWLR (Pt. 733) 468

EVIDENCE - Declaratory relief - Evidence - To obtain a declaratory relief as to a right - There has to be evidence - The right will not be conferred simply upon the state of the pleadings (H4) Eke v. Okwaranyia (2001) 4 KLR (pt. 120) 1181; (2001) 12 NWLR (Pt. 726) 181

EVIDENCE - Defamation - Defamatory materials - Reading it out to an audience - That know it was written - Such publication is libel and not slander (H9) Offoboche v. Ogoja L.G. (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 128) 2843; (2001) 16 NWLR (Pt. 739) 458

EVIDENCE - Defamation - Evidence - As there was no evidence - That the respondent was indebted to the appellant - It was libellous - To hold him out as unable to discharge the debt (H2) A.C.B. Ltd. v. Apugo (2001) 2 KLR (pt. 116) 653; (2001) 5 NWLR (Pt. 707) 483

EVIDENCE - Defamation - Justification - Defendant must prove strictly - The truth of every allegation of fact - And not the truth of every word - In the libel - In order to succeed - With this defence of justification (H1) A.C.B. Ltd. v. Apugo (2001) 2 KLR (pt. 116) 653; (2001)


INDEX OF SUBJECT MATTER ALL SC 2001 DECISIONS

5 NWLR (Pt. 707) 483

EVIDENCE - Defence of insanity - Lack of evidence - Failure by the defence to adduce evidence of insanity - Is enough to deprive the accused of the defence (H5) Madjemu v. State (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 121) 1411; (2001) 9 NWLR (Pt. 718) 349

EVIDENCE - Defence of Insanity - Proof - An accused who seeks to avail himself of the defence - What he must prove to succeed (H4) Madjemu v. State (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 121) 1411; (2001) 9 NWLR (Pt. 718) 349

EVIDENCE - Document - Document - That was discountenanced by the trial judge - In respect of which there was no appeal - It cannot be directly or surreptitiously looked at by the appellate court (H4) Bank of the North v. Yau (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 122) 1561; (2001) 10 NWLR (Pt. 721) 408

EVIDENCE - Documentary evidence - Formal proof - May be waived by a party - If the document is not absolutely inadmissible (H5) IBWA v. Imano Ltd. (2001) 3 KLR (pt. 118) 873

EVIDENCE - Documents - Contradictions - Oral evidence is admissible - To assist the court _ In determining the probative value of a document (H3) Jack v. Whyte (2001) 3 KLR (pt. 118) 937; (2001) 6 NWLR (Pt. 709) 266

EVIDENCE - Documents - Copy of a bank's statement of account - Appellant is estopped from contesting its admissibility - Having failed to object when it was admitted - Without fulfilling the conditions for its admissibility (H7) IBWA v. Imano Ltd. (2001) 3 KLR (pt. 118) 873

EVIDENCE - Documents - Copy of an entry in a bankers book - In the absence of any issue - As to its correctness and accuracy - And without evidence to the contrary by defendants - It is presumed to be correctly copied from the original bank ledger (H3) IBWA v. Imano Ltd. (2001) 3 KLR (pt. 118) 873


INDEX OF SUBJECT MATTER ALL SC 2001 DECISIONS

EVIDENCE - Documents - Copy of an entry in a bankers book - Is admissible - Once there is substantial compliance with s. 96(2)(2) of the Evidence Act (H2) IBWA v. Imano Ltd. (2001) 3 KLR (pt. 118) 873

EVIDENCE - Documents - Secondary evidence - Copy of an entry in a bankers book - Is admissible under certain conditions (H1) IBWA v. Imano Ltd. (2001) 3 KLR (pt. 118) 873

EVIDENCE - Documents - Tendered and admitted by trial court - May be relied on to ascertain truth of a complaint by appellate court - Despite complaints as to its validity (H5) Psychiatric Hospitals Board v. Edosa (2001) 2 KLR (pt. 116) 3531; (2001) 5 NWLR (Pt. 707) 612

EVIDENCE - Estoppel - Admission of liability by a party - That party is estopped from denying such admission (H8) Bank of the North v. Yau (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 122) 1561; (2001) 10 NWLR (Pt. 721) 408

EVIDENCE - Estoppel - Constitution of - To constitute estoppel - The parties subject matter and issue - Must be the same (H1) Biariko v. Edeh-Ogwuile (2001) 4 KLR (pt. 120) 1213; (2001) 12 NWLR (Pt. 726) 235

EVIDENCE - Estoppel - Nature and effect - Of admissions and the plea of estoppel (H7) Bank of the North v. Yau (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 122) 1561; (2001) 10 NWLR (Pt. 721) 408

EVIDENCE - Estoppel - Proof - Issue of fact - Where not sufficiently proved - The issue must be resolved against the party - On whom the burden of proof lies (H4) Adone v. Ikebudu (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 126) 2363; (2001) 14 NWLR (Pt. 733) 385

EVIDENCE - Estoppel - Statements - Which have been acted upon by another to his detriment - In the belief that the statements were true - The maker thereof is absolutely estopped to contradict or deny


INDEX OF SUBJECT MATTER ALL SC 2001 DECISIONS

the truth of such statements (H6) Bank of the North v. Yau (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 122) 1561; (2001) 10 NWLR (Pt. 721) 408

EVIDENCE - Evaluation - Basic qualities - Which evidence must possess - Before a court can act upon it (H10) Rockonoh Property Ltd. v. NITEL Plc. (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 128) 2871; (2001) 14 NWLR (Pt. 733) 468

EVIDENCE - Evaluation - Probative value - Evidence which has no probative value - Cannot be relied upon to support a claim (H9) Rockonoh Property Ltd. v. NITEL Plc. (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 128) 2871; (2001) 14 NWLR (Pt. 733) 468

EVIDENCE - Evaluation - The duty of evaluating evidence - As to value and credibility - Is within the special preserve of the trial judge - As was rightly held by the lower court in this case (H1) Oduneye v. State (2001) 1 KLR (pt. 114) 355; (2001) 2 NWLR (Pt. 697) 311

EVIDENCE - Evaluation of evidence - Was not properly done - As trial court failed to consider the conflicting evidence - Of the Appellants (H6) Jack v. Whyte (2001) 3 KLR (pt. 118) 937; (2001) 6 NWLR (Pt. 709) 266

EVIDENCE - Exhibit - Admitted without objection - Is a valid document the court rely upon - To support the respondent's claim (H6) Narindex Ltd. v. Inter-Continental Bank (2001) 4 KLR (pt. 120) 1321; (2001) 10 NWLR (Pt. 721) 321

EVIDENCE - Exhibits - Land law - Document - Relevance - An exhibit that is not relevant - In proving exclusive possession - Is worthless (H5) Duru v. Onwumelu (2001) 12 KLR (pt. 130) 3287; (2001) 18 NWLR (Pt. 746) 672

EVIDENCE - Exhibits - Rejected evidence - Once a document is tendered - And declared inadmissible - It is wrong to refuse to mark it "Tendered and Rejected" (H1) Babatola v. Aladejana (2001) 6 KLR (pt. 124) 2141; (2001) 12 NWLR (Pt. 728) 597


INDEX OF SUBJECT MATTER ALL SC 2001 DECISIONS

EVIDENCE - Expert Evidence - Opinion evidence - Is rightly rejected if it is inconsistent with the evidence at trial (H2) Nweke v. State (2001) 2 KLR (pt. 115) 501; (2001) 4 NWLR (Pt. 704) 588

EVIDENCE - Expert opinion - Where the writer of the opinion - Is absent as a witness - The opinion must be put - To another expert in the same field for confirmation - Before it becomes part of the evidence to be relied upon (H2) Nteogwuile v. Otuo (2001) 6 KLR (pt. 125) 2205; (2001) 16 NWLR (Pt. 738) 58

EVIDENCE - Extra judicial Statements - Inconsistency Rule - As enunciated in the cases - Does not apply to retracted extrajudicial confessions - But applies to extra- judicial statements which are not confessions (H 4) Akpan v. State (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 127) 2767; (2001) 15 NWLR (Pt. 737) 745

EVIDENCE - Findings of fact - If read together in this case - Suggests the irresistible inference of an agreement - Enough to sustain a charge of conspiracy to murder (H3) Oduneye v. State (2001) 1 KLR (pt. 114) 355; (2001) 2 NWLR (Pt. 697) 311

EVIDENCE - Hearsay evidence - Meaning of hearsay evidence (H1) Ijioffor v. State (2001) 4 KLR (pt. 120) 1345; (2001) 9 NWLR (Pt. 718) 371

EVIDENCE - Hearsay evidence - Witnesses - Where they gave evidence - Only upon what they saw and or experienced - Having regard to the provisions of s. 77 of the Evidence Act - It cannot be said that they gave hearsay evidence (H2) Ijioffor v. State (2001) 4 KLR (pt. 120) 1345; (2001) 9 NWLR (Pt. 718) 371

EVIDENCE - Hearsay rule - Rationale for the rule (H3) Ijioffor v. State (2001) 4 KLR (pt. 120) 1345; (2001) 9 NWLR (Pt. 718) 371

EVIDENCE - Identification of corpse - Will be sustained despite error in witness's testimony - If sufficient identification is established - And


INDEX OF SUBJECT MATTER ALL SC 2001 DECISIONS

there is no miscarriage of justice (H4) Nweke v. State (2001) 2 KLR (pt. 115) 501; (2001) 4 NWLR (Pt. 704) 588

EVIDENCE - Judgment - Of a court - Must be based - On only things pleaded - And supported by clear evidence (H3) Obulor v. Oboro (2001) 4 KLR (pt. 119) 1071; (2001) 8 NWLR (Pt. 714) 25

EVIDENCE - Judgment - Void decision - Judgment written without any evidence supporting the decision - Is void (H7) Menakaya v. Menakaya (2001) 9/10 KLR (pt. 129) 3037; (2001) 16 NWLR (Pt. 738) 203

EVIDENCE - Judgments - A case should be determined - On appraisal and evaluation of relevant evidence - And not on swearing of juju oath (H5) Achiakpa v. Nduka (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 126) 2487; (2001) 14 NWLR (Pt. 734) 623

EVIDENCE - Land Law - Joint ownership - Proof - A party claiming to be joint owners of a property - Need not prove root of title of the joint ownership - If he can prove a joint acquisition of the property (H1) Obasohan v. Omorodion (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 128) 3015; (2001) 13 NWLR (Pt. 729) 206

EVIDENCE - Land law - Registration - Instrument - Consent - Presumption - When consent is endorsed on the instrument - It will raise a presumption of validity of the instrument (H5) Rockonoh Property Ltd. v. NITEL Plc. (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 128) 2871; (2001) 14 NWLR (Pt. 733) 468

EVIDENCE - Land law - Registration - Instrument - Governor's consent - Lands Instrument Registration Law s. 10 - Registrar satisfaction as to Governor's consent - Is a matter of evidence (H4) Rockonoh Property Ltd. v. NITEL Plc. (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 128) 2871; (2001) 14 NWLR (Pt. 733) 468

EVIDENCE - Land Law - Statute - S. 145 Evidence Act - Where a person in possession of land - Is said to be a trespasser - He that so


INDEX OF SUBJECT MATTER ALL SC 2001 DECISIONS

asserts must prove better title to the land (H5) Kyari v. Alkali (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 123) 1753; (2001) 11 NWLR (Pt. 724) 412

EVIDENCE - Land law - Title - Instrument conferring title - Obtaining of necessary consent - The burden of proving that the consent was obtained - Was on the party relying on the validity of the transaction (H7) Rockonoh Property Ltd. v. NITEL Plc. (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 128) 2871; (2001) 14 NWLR (Pt. 733) 468

EVIDENCE - Land law - Title - Proof by traditional evidence - What the plaintiff must prove - And how to resolve conflicting and rival traditional histories - By evidence of recent facts (H2) Aseimo v. Abraham (2001) 6 KLR (pt. 124) 2125; (2001) 16 NWLR (Pt. 738) 20

EVIDENCE - Location of land - As no issue was joined in the pleadings - As to certainty of the land in question - The evidence of the surveyor - Implying uncertainty goes to no issue (H3) Temile v. Awani (2001) 6 KLR (pt. 125) 2159; (2001) 12 NWLR (Pt. 728) 726

EVIDENCE - Locus in quo - As there was no serious conflict or doubt - In the evidence of the plaintiffs and defendants - A visit to the locus was not necessary nor desirable (H6) Kenon v. Tekam (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 126) 2461; (2001) 14 NWLR (Pt. 732) 12

EVIDENCE - Murder - Cause of death - Proof - By Medical evidence - Is not essential in certain circumstances (H10) Alarape v. State (2001) 2 KLR (pt. 116) 543; (2001) 5 NWLR (Pt. 705) 79

EVIDENCE - Murder - Circumstantial evidence - The facts proved are cogent, unequivocal and conclusive - With unbroken chain of circumstances - Suggesting guilt of the appellant (H1) Nweke v. State (2001) 2 KLR (pt. 115) 501; (2001) 4 NWLR (Pt. 704) 588

EVIDENCE - Murder - Voluntary statement of appellant implicated him in the murder - But cannot incriminate his co-accused - In the absence of corroboration (H1) Emeka v. State (2001) 6 KLR (pt.


INDEX OF SUBJECT MATTER ALL SC 2001 DECISIONS

125) 2189; (2001) 14 NWLR (Pt. 734) 666

EVIDENCE - Non suit - Civil proceedings - Balance of probabilities as basis for judgment - Overwhelming evidence - Makes order of non suit improper (H2) Nsirim v. Onuma Construction Co. Ltd. (2001) 3 KLR (pt. 118) 853; (2001) 7 NWLR (Pt. 713) 742

EVIDENCE - Pleadings - Admissions - Facts admitted or not disputed by the defence - Need no further proof by evidence (H1) Temile v. Awani (2001) 6 KLR (pt. 125) 2159; (2001) 12 NWLR (Pt. 728) 726

EVIDENCE - Pleadings - Admitted facts - Cannot be retracted - And does not need further proof by evidence - But it is binding and can be acted upon by the court (H1) Adeye v. Adesanya (2001) 2 KLR (pt. 116) 595; (2001) 6 NWLR (Pt. 708) 1

EVIDENCE - Pleadings - Amendment sought on appeal - Is incompetent - As it will require defendant - To amend his statement of defence - And lead new evidence thereon - Giving the case a completely different complexion (H7) Kode v. Yussuf (2001) 2 KLR (pt. 115) 457; (2001) 4 NWLR (Pt. 703) 392

EVIDENCE - Pleadings - Company meeting minutes - As the issue was not pleaded - But merely arose in cross examination - It goes to no issue (H3) Nsirim v. Onuma Construction Co. Ltd. (2001) 3 KLR (pt. 118) 853; (2001) 7 NWLR (Pt. 713) 742

EVIDENCE - Pleadings - Cross examination - Evidence - Which is not material - To any issue raised by the pleading - May be disregarded - Even though obtained in cross examination (H2) Kayode v. Odutola (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 123) 1861; (2001) 11 NWLR (Pt. 725) 659

EVIDENCE - Pleadings - Fair hearing - Evidence must be directed and confined - To proof or disproof of issues - As settled by the parties in their pleadings -To avoid denial of fair hearing to any of the


INDEX OF SUBJECT MATTER ALL SC 2001 DECISIONS

parties (H4) Kyari v. Alkali (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 123) 1753; (2001) 11 NWLR (Pt. 724) 412

EVIDENCE - Pleadings - Having led evidence - In line with pleading - As to grant of land in dispute to him - Appellant cannot later ask to plead settlement instead of grant (H2) Kode v. Yussuf (2001) 2 KLR (pt. 115) 457; (2001) 4 NWLR (Pt. 703) 392

EVIDENCE - Pleadings - Issues - Trial judge was in error - To have based his conclusion - On facts neither pleaded nor testified to in evidence - By the parties (H1) Nteogwuile v. Otuo (2001) 6 KLR (pt. 125) 2205; (2001) 16 NWLR (Pt. 738) 58

EVIDENCE - Pleadings - Purpose and procedure - The purpose of pleadings is to bring the parties to issues that arise - But there is no obligation to set out the subordinate facts that may help as evidentiary material (H2) Eke v. Okwaranyia (2001) 4 KLR (pt. 120) 1181; (2001) 12 NWLR (Pt. 726) 181

EVIDENCE - Pleadings do not amount to evidence - And failure to adduce evidence in challenge of evidence of plaintiff - Is deemed to be acceptance of his evidence - Despite the general traverse (H9) IBWA v. Imano Ltd. (2001) 3 KLR (pt. 118) 873

EVIDENCE - Practice & procedure - Evaluation - Error of trial - Where the trial judge dismissed plaintiff's entire claim - Without evaluating evidence - He was in error - And retrial would have been ordered - If he had closed his judgment at that stage (H1) Jekpe v. Alokwe (2001) 4 KLR (pt. 120) 985; (2001) 8 NWLR (Pt. 715) 252

EVIDENCE - Practice & Procedure - Pleadings - Representatives capacity - Where the pleadings and the evidence of a party - Disclose a representative capacity - Judgment can be entered for such a party - Even if an amendment to reflect that capacity has not been obtained (H14) Kyari v. Alkali (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 123) 1753; (2001) 11 NWLR (Pt. 724) 412


INDEX OF SUBJECT MATTER ALL SC 2001 DECISIONS

EVIDENCE - Proof - Beyond reasonable doubt - Circumstantial evidence - Conviction based on circumstantial evidence - Is proof beyond reasonable doubt in this case (H8) Ijioffor v. State (2001) 4 KLR (pt. 120) 1345; (2001) 9 NWLR (Pt. 718) 371

EVIDENCE - Proof - Fair hearing - The appellants who allege a denial of fair hearing - Must show that their civil right and obligation - Have been adversely affected (H2) Kenon v. Tekam (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 126) 2461; (2001) 14 NWLR (Pt. 732) 12

EVIDENCE - Proof - Land matters - Where a plaintiff produces evidence - Entitling him to judgment - Defendant must lead evidence - To enable the court decide on which side the case preponderates (H5) Adeleke v. Iyanda (2001) 6 KLR (pt. 124) 1973; (2001) 13 NWLR (Pt. 729) 1

EVIDENCE - Proof - Wrongful termination - Breach of terms of the contract of employment - Onus of proof in on the employee who filed the action (H1) Okomu Oil Ltd. v. Iserhienrhien (2001) 3 KLR (pt. 117) 797; (2001) 6 NWLR (Pt. 710) 660

EVIDENCE - Proof beyond reasonable doubt - Where the evidence against each of the accused persons is overwhelming - And there is no special ground which would establish any doubt as to their guilt - The prosecution has proved its case beyond reasonable doubt (H4) Odu v. State (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 122) 1551; (2001) 10 NWLR (Pt. 722) 668

EVIDENCE - Public Officers Protection Law s. 2(a) - Abuse of office and bad faith - Deprive a party the protection of that provision - And burden of proof is on plaintiff (H7) Offoboche v. Ogoja L.G. (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 128) 2843; (2001) 16 NWLR (Pt. 739) 458

EVIDENCE - Rape - Contradictions - There were some contradictions - In the evidence of the witnesses - As outlined in this case (H3) Iko v. State (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 126) 2419; (2001) 14 NWLR (Pt. 732) 221


INDEX OF SUBJECT MATTER ALL SC 2001 DECISIONS

EVIDENCE - Rape - Corroboration - The circumstances of this case - Warranted corroboration of prosecutrix evidence - Which burden was not discharged (H13) Iko v. State (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 126) 2419; (2001) 14 NWLR (Pt. 732) 221

EVIDENCE - Rape - Corroboration - The evidence of PW3 - Based on hearsay cannot be corroboration of evidence of the prosecutrix (H6) Jegede v. State (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 126) 2527; (2001) 14 NWLR (Pt. 733) 264

EVIDENCE - Rape - Penetration - The evidence of the prosecutrix - As to penetration - Is not ipso facto sufficient proof of same - In the absence of corroborative evidence (H12) Iko v. State (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 126) 2419; (2001) 14 NWLR (Pt. 732) 221

EVIDENCE - Rape - Penetration - There must be proof of penetration - Which must be linked with the appellant - Before he is convicted (H2) Jegede v. State (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 126) 2527; (2001) 14 NWLR (Pt. 733) 264

EVIDENCE - Rape - Proof - The evidence of the pathologist - Is not sufficient proof - To convict for rape (H1) Jegede v. State (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 126) 2527; (2001) 14 NWLR (Pt. 733) 264

EVIDENCE - Review and evaluation of evidence - Distinction between the two - The duty was properly discharged by trial court (H6) Abidoye v. Alawode (2001) 3 KLR (pt. 118) 917; (2001) 6 NWLR (Pt. 709) 463

EVIDENCE - Standard of proof - Declaration of title - Such cases are decided on balance of probability - As in all civil cases (H7) Adeleke v. Iyanda (2001) 6 KLR (pt. 124) 1973; (2001) 13 NWLR (Pt. 729) 1

EVIDENCE - Standard of proof - Where as in this case the plaintiff has adduced satisfactory evidence - And none is available from the


INDEX OF SUBJECT MATTER ALL SC 2001 DECISIONS

defendant - The case will be decided upon a minimum proof (H8) Adeleke v. Iyanda (2001) 6 KLR (pt. 124) 1973; (2001) 13 NWLR (Pt. 729) 1

EVIDENCE - Survey plan - Where there is clear evidence of boundaries - It will be perverse to rely on imprecise description of the land (H2) Basil v. Fajebe (2001) 4 KLR (pt. 120) 1273; (2001) 11 NWLR (Pt. 725) 592

EVIDENCE - Title - Cross action - Plaintiffs were able to discharge their burden of proof - On the balance of probabilities - Unlike the defendants (H8) Kenon v. Tekam (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 126) 2461; (2001) 14 NWLR (Pt. 732) 12

EVIDENCE - Title - Plaintiff is required to satisfy the court by evidence - And not by admission in the defendants' pleadings - That he is entitled to the declaration of title (H7) Temile v. Awani (2001) 6 KLR (pt. 125) 2159; (2001) 12 NWLR (Pt. 728) 726

EVIDENCE - Title - Proof - Long possession - Where it is the basis for plaintiffs' claim - They must prove numerous acts of ownership and possession - Over a sufficient length of time (H6) Duru v. Onwumelu (2001) 12 KLR (pt. 130) 3287; (2001) 18 NWLR (Pt. 746) 672

EVIDENCE - Title - Proof - Onus of proof is on the party seeking the declaration - And he must succeed on the strength of his own case - Not the weakness of the defence (H6) Temile v. Awani (2001) 6 KLR (pt. 125) 2159; (2001) 12 NWLR (Pt. 728) 726

EVIDENCE - Title - Proof by inference s. 46 Evidence Act - Based on acts of possession over adjoining land - Does not avail the plaintiffs (H7) Duru v. Onwumelu (2001) 12 KLR (pt. 130) 3287; (2001) 18 NWLR (Pt. 746) 672

EVIDENCE - Title - Traditional Evidence - Party relying on traditional evidence - Cannot plead vaguely - But must prove some facts - Such as who founded the land (H11) Achiakpa v. Nduka (2001) 7 KLR


INDEX OF SUBJECT MATTER ALL SC 2001 DECISIONS

(pt. 126) 2487; (2001) 14 NWLR (Pt. 734) 623

EVIDENCE - Title to land - Root of title - A party claiming land - Is not bound to plead and prove more than one root of title to succeed (H4) Biariko v. Edeh-Ogwuile (2001) 4 KLR (pt. 120) 1213; (2001) 12 NWLR (Pt. 726) 235

EVIDENCE - Title to land - Traditional history - The principles in Kojo v Bonsie - When it will be resorted to (H5) Biariko v. Edeh-Ogwuile (2001) 4 KLR (pt. 120) 1213; (2001) 12 NWLR (Pt. 726) 235

EVIDENCE - Tribunals - Affidavits - Credibility of witnesses - The procedure adopted by the tribunal - For determining credibility of witnesses it had not seen - Is unsupported by law and wrong (H5) Chairman N.P.C. v. Chairman Ikere LG.A (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 128) 2805; (2001) 13 NWLR (Pt. 731) 540

EVIDENCE - Witnesses - As conviction can be based on evidence of a sole witness - The prosecution is not required to call every eye witness to the offence - Even when they are described as material witnesses (H6) Oduneye v. State (2001) 1 KLR (pt. 114) 355; (2001) 2 NWLR (Pt. 697) 311

EVIDENCE - Witnesses - Contradictions - In appellants evidence - Confirms the contention of the respondents - As was rightly held by the lower court (H2) Jack v. Whyte (2001) 3 KLR (pt. 118) 937; (2001) 6 NWLR (Pt. 709) 266

EVIDENCE - Witnesses - Disbelieving of - A trial judge is at liberty - To disbelieve some portion of a witness's testimony - While believing his unaffected evidence (H14) Udoebre v. State (2001) 6 KLR (pt. 124) 1945; (2001) 12 NWLR (Pt. 728) 617

EVIDENCE - Witnesses - Identification evidence - Was rightly discountenanced by the trial judge - As the witness failed to identify appellant - In her earlier statement to the police (H1) Udoebre v.


INDEX OF SUBJECT MATTER ALL SC 2001 DECISIONS

State (2001) 6 KLR (pt. 124) 1945; (2001) 12 NWLR (Pt. 728) 617

EVIDENCE - Witnesses - Material or indispensable witness - A person does not become such a witness - If there is no nexus and if his evidence would not be helpful - In getting at the truth (H8) Oduneye v. State (2001) 1 KLR (pt. 114) 355; (2001) 2 NWLR (Pt. 697) 311

EVIDENCE - Witnesses - Prosecution must call any material or indispensable witness even if not favourable to its case - Or if not raise a doubt which must be resolved in favour of the defence (H7) Oduneye v. State (2001) 1 KLR (pt. 114) 355; (2001) 2 NWLR (Pt. 697) 311

EVIDENCE - Witnesses - Prosecution's duty - Lies in calling such witnesses - Required to establish the case (H7) Ijioffor v. State (2001) 4 KLR (pt. 120) 1345; (2001) 9 NWLR (Pt. 718) 371

EVIDENCE- Concurrent finding of facts - If supported by sufficient evidence - Should not be disturbed - By appellate court (H2) Adeye v. Adesanya (2001) 2 KLR (pt. 116) 595; (2001) 6 NWLR (Pt. 708) 1

FAIR HEARING - Appeal - Any judgment or ruling - Based on breach of constitutional provision of fair hearing - Will not be allowed to stand on appeal (H3) Ogundoyin v. Adeyemi (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 127) 2687; (2001) 13 NWLR (Pt. 730) 403

FAIR HEARING - Appeals - Issues - Failure to consider all issues posed - Did not amount to denial of fair hearing - As the live issue was considered - And no miscarriage of justice was occasioned (H2) Seven UP Ltd. v. Abiola & Sons Ltd. (2001) 6 KLR (pt. 124) 2017; (2001) 13 NWLR (Pt. 730) 469

FAIR HEARING - Appeals - Suo motu issue - Fair hearing - Failure to hear the defendants on the suo motu issue - Amounted to a denial of fair hearing (H20) Achiakpa v. Nduka (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 126) 2487; (2001) 14 NWLR (Pt. 734) 623


INDEX OF SUBJECT MATTER ALL SC 2001 DECISIONS

FAIR HEARING - Appeals - The appeal was rightly allowed - As the procedure for fair hearing - Was not strictly complied with (H1) Psychiatric Hospitals Board v. Edosa (2001) 2 KLR (pt. 116) 3531; (2001) 5 NWLR (Pt. 707) 612

FAIR HEARING - Bias - The decision in an earlier suit by the trial judge - Did not affect his determination - Of the present proceeding sufficiently - To raise a question of likelihood of bias (H3) Kenon v. Tekam (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 126) 2461; (2001) 14 NWLR (Pt. 732) 12

FAIR HEARING - Bias - Waiver - The absence of complaint by the defendants - On the likelihood of bias in the trial judge at the trial - Did not amount to a waiver (H4) Kenon v. Tekam (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 126) 2461; (2001) 14 NWLR (Pt. 732) 12

FAIR HEARING - Contempt - Committal proceedings - Where the judgment debtors were not heard - The whole proceedings fell short of the standard of fair hearing (H8) Abbas v. Solomon (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 126) 2549; (2001) 15 NWLR (Pt. 735) 144

FAIR HEARING - Court - Issue - Raised suo motu - The parties must be given an opportunity to be heard on the issue (H10) Abbas v. Solomon (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 126) 2549; (2001) 15 NWLR (Pt. 735) 144

FAIR HEARING - Evidence - Proof - Fair hearing - The appellants who allege a denial of fair hearing - Must show that their civil right and obligation - Have been adversely affected (H2) Kenon v. Tekam (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 126) 2461; (2001) 14 NWLR (Pt. 732) 12

FAIR HEARING - Hearing notice - Non appearance of party - The dismissal of the appellants' case - Was a breach of his right to fair hearing - As there was no proof of service of hearing notice on him (H4) Ogundoyin v. Adeyemi (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 127) 2687; (2001) 13 NWLR (Pt. 730) 403

FAIR HEARING - Meaning - S.33 (1) 1979 Constitution - Meaning


INDEX OF SUBJECT MATTER ALL SC 2001 DECISIONS

of fair hearing (H1) Kenon v. Tekam (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 126) 2461; (2001) 14 NWLR (Pt. 732) 12

FAIR HEARING - Pleadings - Evidence must be directed and confined - To proof or disproof of issues - As settled by the parties in their pleadings -To avoid denial of fair hearing to any of the parties (H4) Kyari v. Alkali (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 123) 1753; (2001) 11 NWLR (Pt. 724) 412

FAIR HEARING - Technicalities - Once procedure for fair hearing is or is not complied with - Incorrect citation of relevant provisions does not matter (H2) Psychiatric Hospitals Board v. Edosa (2001) 2 KLR (pt. 116) 3531; (2001) 5 NWLR (Pt. 707) 612

FAMILY LAW - Dissolution of marriage - Proceedings - It is mandatory that proceedings in respect of petition for dissolution of marriage - Shall be in public (H2) Menakaya v. Menakaya (2001) 9/10 KLR (pt. 129) 3037; (2001) 16 NWLR (Pt. 738) 203

FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS - Enforcement - Application for leave - Exercise of discretion - Applicant who seeks the exercise of the court's discretion - Has the burden of presenting all the material facts necessary for the exercise of the discretion (H7) Dongtoe v. Civil Service Commission Plateau State (2001) 4 KLR (pt. 120) 1239; (2001) 9 NWLR (Pt. 717) 132

FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS - Enforcement of under 1979 Rules - Chieftaincy disputes cannot be enforced under this Rule - As properly held by the lower courts (H2) Gov. of Kogi State v. Yakubu (2001) 3 KLR (pt. 118) 903; (2001) 6 NWLR (Pt. 710) 521

FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS - Enforcement procedure - Principal claim - Where a each of the provisions of chapter IV is the principal claim - The procedure can be invoked even though other claims are made (H4) Dongtoe v. Civil Service Commission Plateau State (2001) 4 KLR (pt. 120) 1239; (2001) 9 NWLR (Pt. 717) 132


INDEX OF SUBJECT MATTER ALL SC 2001 DECISIONS

FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS - Enforcement procedure - The relief which may be claimed by means of the procedure - Is limited to any of the provisions of Chapter IV of the Constitution (H2) Dongtoe v. Civil Service Commission Plateau State (2001) 4 KLR (pt. 120) 1239; (2001) 9 NWLR (Pt. 717) 132

HOMICIDE - Proof - Cause of death - Is a fact in issue - Which may be proved by direct or circumstantial evidence (H1) Ahmed v. State (2001) 12 KLR (pt. 130) 33; (2001) 18 NWLR (Pt. 746) 622

HOMICIDE - Proof - Cause of death - Medical evidence is direct evidence - Where not available - Circumstantial evidence may be relied on (H2) Ahmed v. State (2001) 12 KLR (pt. 130) 33; (2001) 18 NWLR (Pt. 746) 622

INJUNCTIONS - Claim - Non existing legal right - Section 7(1) of Decree No. 36 of 1996 - Where no property was vested in the plaintiff under the subsection - It has nothing to protect by way of injunction - Arising by operation of the subsection (H6) A-G Ondo State v. A-G Ekiti State (2001) 9/10 KLR (pt. 129) 3161; (2001) 17 NWLR (Pt. 743) 706

INJUNCTIONS - Consequential order - Main claim - Where the main claim was not granted - The order of injunction which was consequential cannot stand (H12) Obasohan v. Omorodion (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 128) 3015; (2001) 13 NWLR (Pt. 729) 206

INJUNCTIONS - Order of - When it will be made - Reason and condition for its grant (H3) Adenuga v. Odumeru (2001) 1 KLR (pt. 114) 197; (2001) 2 NWLR (Pt. 696) 184

INJUNCTIONS - Remedy - Is not available - In respect of issues not raised in the action - Or matters not directly related to the issues raised (H4) Adenuga v. Odumeru (2001) 1 KLR (pt. 114) 197; (2001) 2 NWLR (Pt. 696) 184

INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATIONS - Appeals - An appellate court -


INDEX OF SUBJECT MATTER ALL SC 2001 DECISIONS

Should not express its entire mind - On the merits of a matter - In which it is not going to make a final decision (H3) Seven UP Ltd. v. Abiola & Sons Ltd. (2001) 6 KLR (pt. 124) 2017; (2001) 13 NWLR (Pt. 730) 469

INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATIONS - Appeals - Stay of proceedings - Appellate courts should not deal with the merits of the substantive suit - In the interlocutory application (H3) United Spinners Ltd. v. Chartered Bank Ltd. (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 127) 2745; (2001) 14 NWLR (Pt. 732) 195

INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATIONS - Stay of execution - Discretion - In exercising the discretion to grant or refuse same - The competing rights of the parties should be considered (H2) Olunloyo v. Adeniran (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 128) 2967; (2001) 14 NWLR (Pt. 734) 699

INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATIONS - Stay of Execution - Grant of - Stay will be granted only if the court is satisfied - That there are special or exceptional circumstances - Which warrant it (H1) Olunloyo v. Adeniran (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 128) 2967; (2001) 14 NWLR (Pt. 734) 699

INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATIONS - Stay of execution - Pendency of appeal - Special circumstances which have received judicial approval (H3) Olunloyo v. Adeniran (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 128) 2967; (2001) 14 NWLR (Pt. 734) 699

INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATIONS - Stay of proceedings - Power to grant - The discretionary power of the court of Appeal - To stay proceedings must be exercised judicially and judiciously (H1) United Spinners Ltd. v. Chartered Bank Ltd. (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 127) 2745; (2001) 14 NWLR (Pt. 732) 195

INTERPRETATION OF STATUTES - Principle - Court faced with the interpretation of a statute - Has a duty to first discover the intention of the lawmakers (H6) Miscellaneous Offences Tribunal v. Okonkwo (2001) 9/10 KLR (pt. 129) 3233


INDEX OF SUBJECT MATTER ALL SC 2001 DECISIONS

JUDGMENTS - Arbitration - Arbitrators' award - Once filed in court - Has the force and effect of a judgment (H1) Ras Pal Gazi Constr. Co. Ltd. v. F.C.D.A. (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 122) 1651; (2001) 10 NWLR (Pt. 722) 559

JUDGMENTS - Appeal - Conclusion of a trial court - Which was not appealed against in the Court of Appeal - The Supreme Court cannot pronounce on it (H6) Biariko v. Edeh-Ogwuile (2001) 4 KLR (pt. 120) 1213; (2001) 12 NWLR (Pt. 726) 235

JUDGMENTS - Appeal - Decision - Based on an erroneous premises - On a matter that goes to the root of the controversy - Cannot be allowed to stand (H2) Bank of the North v. Yau (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 122) 1561; (2001) 10 NWLR (Pt. 721) 408

JUDGMENTS - Appeal - Finding not appealed against - Is deemed correct until the contrary is shown (H7) Biariko v. Edeh-Ogwuile (2001) 4 KLR (pt. 120) 1213; (2001) 12 NWLR (Pt. 726) 235

JUDGMENTS - Appeal - Ground of appeal - Omnibus ground - Where there was no evidence to support the trial court's finding of liability - The finding can be challenged on the omnibus ground - Though not very ideal (H3) Sparklin Brew. Ltd. v. Union Bank (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 128) 2911; (2001) 15 NWLR (Pt. 737) 539

JUDGMENTS - Appeal - Grounds of appeal - Reason not forming part of the decision in a judgment - Cannot be relied on to challenge its validity (H8) Dongtoe v. Civil Service Commission Plateau State (2001) 4 KLR (pt. 120) 1239; (2001) 9 NWLR (Pt. 717) 132

JUDGMENTS - Appeal - Hearsay evidence - Conviction based on hearsay evidence - Appellate court may quash such conviction - In the absence of other evidence (H4) Ijioffor v. State (2001) 4 KLR (pt. 120) 1345; (2001) 9 NWLR (Pt. 718) 371

JUDGMENTS - Appeals - Evaluation of evidence - Where not prop


INDEX OF SUBJECT MATTER ALL SC 2001 DECISIONS

erly done before upholding trial courts finding - Supreme Court will set aside the judgment (H7) Basil v. Fajebe (2001) 4 KLR (pt. 120) 1273; (2001) 11 NWLR (Pt. 725) 592

JUDGMENTS - Appeals - Finality of Court of Appeal's decision - As provided in s. 81 (1) and (3) of Decree No.5 of 1999 - Makes the present appeal incompetent (H2) Onuaguluchi v. Ndu (2001) 3 KLR (pt. 117) 831; (2001) 7 NWLR (Pt. 712) 309

JUDGMENTS - Appeals - Inconsistent findings - The trial court cannot blow hot and cold - In finding one thing and holding another (H7) Kayode v. Odutola (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 123) 1861; (2001) 11 NWLR (Pt. 725) 659

JUDGMENTS - Appeals - Review of Court's judgment - Cannot be done by that court - Towards varying the judgment - Only clerical mistake or accidental slip can be corrected - Order 5 r. 3 Court of Appeal Rules (H5) Onuaguluchi v. Ndu (2001) 3 KLR (pt. 117) 831; (2001) 7 NWLR (Pt. 712) 309

JUDGMENTS - Arbitration - Arbitrators award - Once filed in court - Has the force and effect of a judgment (H1) Ras Pal Gazi Constr. Co. Ltd. v. F.C.D.A. (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 122) 1651; (2001) 10 NWLR (Pt. 722) 559

JUDGMENTS - Arbitration - Conversion to courts judgment - The court has no jurisdiction - To convert the award into its judgment - Rather it will enter it as a judgment - And give effect to it - In the absence of a challenge (H3) Ras Pal Gazi Constr. Co. Ltd. v. F.C.D.A. (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 122) 1651; (2001) 10 NWLR (Pt. 722) 559

JUDGMENTS - Awards - Evidence - Misdirection - It is a misdirection for a trial judge - To give judgment on an issue on which there is no evidence adduced (H6) Menakaya v. Menakaya (2001) 9/10 KLR (pt. 129) 3037; (2001) 16 NWLR (Pt. 738) 203

JUDGMENTS - Concurrent findings of facts - Attitude of Supreme


INDEX OF SUBJECT MATTER ALL SC 2001 DECISIONS

Court to such findings - Is not to interfere - Save where perverse (H9) Dongtoe v. Civil Service Commission Plateau State (2001) 4 KLR (pt. 120) 1239; (2001) 9 NWLR (Pt. 717) 132

JUDGMENTS - Concurrent findings of facts - Circumstances when the Supreme Court will interfere with such findings (H2) Biariko v. Edeh-Ogwuile (2001) 4 KLR (pt. 120) 1213; (2001) 12 NWLR (Pt. 726) 235

JUDGMENTS - Consent Judgment - Authority of counsel - Limitation - Where the authority of counsel has been expressly limited by the client - And if the limitation of authority is known to the other side - Consent of counsel outside the limits of his authority - Is of no effect (H12) Vulcan Gases Ltd. v. Gasellschaft Fur Industries (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 121) 1437; (2001) 9 NWLR (Pt. 719) 610

JUDGMENTS - Consent judgment - Effect - No consent judgment has any operation whether by way of estoppel or otherwise - Against any of the parties who is not shown to have consented to it - But between consenting parties and their privies - It is as effective as any judgment given after the matters are fully fought to the end (H15) Vulcan Gases Ltd. v. Gasellschaft Fur Industries (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 121) 1437; (2001) 9 NWLR (Pt. 719) 610

JUDGMENTS - Consent judgment - How reached - The parties must reach a complete and final agreement - On the vital issue in their terms of settlement (H7) Vulcan Gases Ltd. v. Gasellschaft Fur Industries (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 121) 1437; (2001) 9 NWLR (Pt. 719) 610

JUDGMENTS - Consent judgment - Initiated by fraud - Can be set aside - But by a fresh action (H8) Vulcan Gases Ltd. v. Gasellschaft Fur Industries (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 121) 1437; (2001) 9 NWLR (Pt. 719) 610

JUDGMENTS - Consent judgment - Legal practitioner - Withdrawal of consent - Where counsel by the authority of his client consents to an order - The client cannot arbitrarily withdraw such consent (H10)


INDEX OF SUBJECT MATTER ALL SC 2001 DECISIONS

Vulcan Gases Ltd. v. Gasellschaft Fur Industries (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 121) 1437; (2001) 9 NWLR (Pt. 719) 610

JUDGMENTS - Consent judgment - Mistake of counsel - Where counsel agreed to a consent order being made under misapprehension - The court will not hold him or his client to the agreement (H11) Vulcan Gases Ltd. v. Gasellschaft Fur Industries (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 121) 1437; (2001) 9 NWLR (Pt. 719) 610

JUDGMENTS - Consent Judgment - Non - disclosure of material facts - Consent judgment reached in such circumstance - Cannot be allowed to stand (H17) Vulcan Gases Ltd. v. Gasellschaft Fur Industries (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 121) 1437; (2001) 9 NWLR (Pt. 719) 610

JUDGMENTS - Consent judgment - Setting aside - As fraudulent misrepresentation is a question of fact - The courts rightly held - That it had not been proved by evidence in this case (H3) Afegbai v. A-G Edo State (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 127) 2709; (2001) 14 NWLR (Pt. 733) 425

JUDGMENTS - Consent judgment - Setting aside - Grounds for setting aside such judgment (H5) Vulcan Gases Ltd. v. Gasellschaft Fur Industries (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 121) 1437; (2001) 9 NWLR (Pt. 719) 610

JUDGMENTS - Consent judgment - Setting aside on grounds of fraudulent misrepresentation - How to determine - Whether fraudulent misrepresentation was established (H2) Afegbai v. A-G Edo State (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 127) 2709; (2001) 14 NWLR (Pt. 733) 425

JUDGMENTS - Consent judgment - Setting aside on the grounds of fraudulent misrepresentation - The applicable principal is the same - As would apply for rescission of contract (H1) Afegbai v. A-G Edo State (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 127) 2709; (2001) 14 NWLR (Pt. 733) 425

JUDGMENTS - Consent judgment - Unauthorised terms - In the purported settlement - Where it is detrimental - It would be wrong to


INDEX OF SUBJECT MATTER ALL SC 2001 DECISIONS

allow the consent judgment to stand (H18) Vulcan Gases Ltd. v. Gasellschaft Fur Industries (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 121) 1437; (2001) 9 NWLR (Pt. 719) 610

JUDGMENTS - Contempt - Civil contempt - Application for committal - Procedure - Such an application must strictly comply with the provisions set out in the Judgments (Enforcement) Rules (H5) Abbas v. Solomon (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 126) 2549; (2001) 15 NWLR (Pt. 735) 144

JUDGMENTS - Contempt - Committal proceedings - Fair hearing - Where the judgment debtors were not heard - The whole proceedings fell short of the standard of fair hearing (H8) Abbas v. Solomon (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 126) 2549; (2001) 15 NWLR (Pt. 735) 144

JUDGMENTS - Contempt - Committal proceedings - Procedure to be followed - Before an order to commit a judgment debtor to prison may be made (H7) Abbas v. Solomon (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 126) 2549; (2001) 15 NWLR (Pt. 735) 144

JUDGMENTS - Courts - Evidence of relevant facts - Should not be ignored in deciding the probability of a question of fact - Lest public confidence in judicial process be severely eroded (H6) Basil v. Fajebe (2001) 4 KLR (pt. 120) 1273; (2001) 11 NWLR (Pt. 725) 592

JUDGMENTS - Damages - Claim of a single award - For several causes of action - Where the respondents were liable for only a few of the libels proved - And not entirely for the same instances of libel - Separate awards are called for (H12) Offoboche v. Ogoja L.G. (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 128) 2843; (2001) 16 NWLR (Pt. 739) 458

JUDGMENTS - Decisions - Duty of trial judge - Is to reach a decision - Only upon the basis of what is in issue - And what has been demonstrated by evidence supported by law - Failure in this duty - Will make the appellate court to intervene (H4) Adeleke v. Iyanda (2001) 6 KLR (pt. 124) 1973; (2001) 13 NWLR (Pt. 729) 1


INDEX OF SUBJECT MATTER ALL SC 2001 DECISIONS

JUDGMENTS - Declaratory relief - Evidence - To obtain a declaratory relief as to a right - There has to be evidence - The right will not be conferred simply upon the state of the pleadings (H4) Eke v. Okwaranyia (2001) 4 KLR (pt. 120) 1181; (2001) 12 NWLR (Pt. 726) 181

JUDGMENTS - Discretion - Evidence - An exercise of discretion by a court - Must be guided by evidence (H8) Menakaya v. Menakaya (2001) 9/10 KLR (pt. 129) 3037; (2001) 16 NWLR (Pt. 738) 203

JUDGMENTS - Election petitions - Wrong decision - Cannot be altered by the Supreme Court under any guise - Where the Constitution has made the Court of Appeal the final court (H3) Onuaguluchi v. Ndu (2001) 3 KLR (pt. 117) 831; (2001) 7 NWLR (Pt. 712) 309

JUDGMENTS - Enforcement of - Unless otherwise stipulated by statute Judgment may be enforced by a writ of attachment or by committal (H2) Abbas v. Solomon (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 126) 2549; (2001) 15 NWLR (Pt. 735) 144

JUDGMENTS - Error - Appellate court - inherent power - To correct judgment - There is such power in the Supreme Court to correct its judgment or that of the lower court - In order to avert mischief (H1) Bank of the North v. Yau (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 122) 1561; (2001) 10 NWLR (Pt. 721) 408

JUDGMENTS - Errors - Only substantial errors - That occasion miscarriage of justice - Will warrant interference by appellate court (H6) Abimbola v. Abatan (2001) 4 KLR (pt. 120) 1149; (2001) 9 NWLR (Pt. 717) 66

JUDGMENTS - Estoppel - Proof - Issue of fact - Where not sufficiently proved - The issue must be resolved against the party - On whom the burden of proof lies (H4) Adone v. Ikebudu (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 126) 2363; (2001) 14 NWLR (Pt. 733) 385

JUDGMENTS - Estoppel - Res judicata - Previous judgment - May


INDEX OF SUBJECT MATTER ALL SC 2001 DECISIONS

be pleaded by a plaintiff - As mere estoppel not as estoppel per rem judicatam (H2) Achiakpa v. Nduka (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 126) 2487; (2001) 14 NWLR (Pt. 734) 623

JUDGMENTS - Evidence - A case should be determined - On appraisal and evaluation of relevant evidence - And not on swearing of juju oath (H5) Achiakpa v. Nduka (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 126) 2487; (2001) 14 NWLR (Pt. 734) 623

JUDGMENTS - Final order - Interlocutory motion - To be joined as Coadministrators - An order granting such application - Determined the rights of the parties - And is therefore a final order (H10) Igunbor v. Afolabi (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 121) 152; (2001) 11 NWLR (Pt. 723) 148

JUDGMENTS - Findings - On evidence and issues - Not before the court is unacceptable - But where supported by ample evidence - The findings will be affirmed (H6) Odonigi v. Oyeleke (2001) 2 KLR (pt. 116) 625; (2001) 6 NWLR (Pt. 708) 12

JUDGMENTS - Findings - Supported by evidence - The court of Appeal was right to have affirmed the findings (H5) Ekpe v. Oke (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 121) 1505; (2001) 10 NWLR (Pt. 721) 341

JUDGMENTS - Ground of appeal - Which has been struck out - Cannot be used as basis for a decision or judgment (H6) Global Trans. Oceanico S.A. v. Free Ent. Ltd. (2001) 2 KLR (pt. 115) 521; (2001) 5 NWLR (Pt. 706) 426

JUDGMENTS - Injunction - Consequential order - Main claim - Where the main claim was not granted - The order of injunction which was consequential cannot stand (H12) Obasohan v. Omorodion (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 128) 3015; (2001) 13 NWLR (Pt. 729) 206

JUDGMENTS - Issue - Conclusive determination of - A decision is conclusive as to what it determines - When it can only be set aside on an appeal being brought for that purpose (H1) MILAD Benue State


INDEX OF SUBJECT MATTER ALL SC 2001 DECISIONS

v. Ulegede (2001) 9/10 KLR (pt. 129) 3135; (2001) 17 NWLR (Pt. 741) 194

JUDGMENTS - Issue - Principles applicable in a case - Are determined by the basic issues in the case (H2) Obasohan v. Omorodion (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 128) 3015; (2001) 13 NWLR (Pt. 729) 206

JUDGMENTS - Issue - Reconsideration of a predetermined issue - At a later stage in the same proceedings - Primary question - Is whether the court has the power to reopen that issue (H2) MILAD Benue State v. Ulegede (2001) 9/10 KLR (pt. 129) 3135; (2001) 17 NWLR (Pt. 741) 194

JUDGMENTS - Issue - Reopening - Issue that has been conclusively settled by a judgment - Cannot be reopened (H3) MILAD Benue State v. Ulegede (2001) 9/10 KLR (pt. 129) 3135; (2001) 17 NWLR (Pt. 741) 194

JUDGMENTS - Judicial precedents - Distinguishing factors - Where facts and issues raised are not the same - A past Supreme Court decision will not be binding (H3) Abu v. Odugbo (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 126) 2299; (2001) 14 NWLR (Pt. 732) 45

JUDGMENTS - Jurisdiction - Cause of action - Which arose before the jurisdiction of the court is ousted - Any further hearing of the matter is null and void - Because any decision it makes amounts to nothing (H5) Isaiah v. Shell Petroleum Ltd. (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 122) 1631; (2001) 11 NWLR (Pt. 723) 168

JUDGMENTS - Jurisdiction - Native court - Estoppel - The procedure adopted by the native court - Was in excess of jurisdiction - And its judgment was null - And cannot support an estoppel (H7) Achiakpa v. Nduka (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 126) 2487; (2001) 14 NWLR (Pt. 734) 623

JUDGMENTS - Jurisdiction - Parties - Court cannot give judgment against a person - Who was not made a party to the action - Or who


INDEX OF SUBJECT MATTER ALL SC 2001 DECISIONS

had no opportunity to defend the suit (H8) Babatola v. Aladejana (2001) 6 KLR (pt. 124) 2141; (2001) 12 NWLR (Pt. 728) 597

JUDGMENTS - Land law - Title - Where the plaintiff fails - To satisfy the court - On the strength of his case - That he is entitled to declaration of title - The proper order is a dismissal of his claim (H4) Nwadiogbu v. Nnadozie (2001) 6 KLR (pt. 124) 2081; (2001) 12 NWLR (Pt. 727) 315

JUDGMENTS - Land matter - Possession - Dismissal of claim where there is no counter claim - Does not ipso facto lead to an order that the claimant - Should cease to enjoy the use and possession of the land in dispute (H5) Adone v. Ikebudu (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 126) 2363; (2001) 14 NWLR (Pt. 733) 385

JUDGMENTS - Non suit - Civil proceedings - Balance of probabilities as basis for judgment - Overwhelming evidence - Makes order of non suit improper (H2) Nsirim v. Onuma Construction Co. Ltd. (2001) 3 KLR (pt. 118) 853; (2001) 7 NWLR (Pt. 713) 742

JUDGMENTS - Notice of discontinuance - Brings the action against the defendant to an end - And any judgment given against remaining defendants - Will not affect that defendant (H2) Ogunkunle v. Cherubim & Seraphim (2001) 6 KLR (pt. 124) 2115; (2001) 12 NWLR (Pt. 727) 359

JUDGMENTS - Null order - Setting aside - Outside the appellate procedure - An order can be set aside if it is a nullity (H6) Vulcan Gases Ltd. v. Gasellschaft Fur Industries (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 121) 1437; (2001) 9 NWLR (Pt. 719) 610

JUDGMENTS - Nullity - Estoppel - Mandatory statutory provision - Decision made contrary to such a provision - Is a nullity (H4) Menakaya v. Menakaya (2001) 9/10 KLR (pt. 129) 3037; (2001) 16 NWLR (Pt. 738) 203

JUDGMENTS - Nullity - Hearing in chambers - Based on consent of


INDEX OF SUBJECT MATTER ALL SC 2001 DECISIONS

both counsel - Contrary to mandatory statutory provision - The proceedings and judgment - Are a nullity (H5) Menakaya v. Menakaya (2001) 9/10 KLR (pt. 129) 3037; (2001) 16 NWLR (Pt. 738) 203

JUDGMENTS - Order - Whether interlocutory or final - How to determine its nature (H9) Igunbor v. Afolabi (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 121) 152; (2001) 11 NWLR (Pt. 723) 148

JUDGMENTS - Pleadings - Defence - It is not for a court to speculate what defences - May have been available to a defendant (H11) Offoboche v. Ogoja L.G. (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 128) 2843; (2001) 16 NWLR (Pt. 739) 458

JUDGMENTS - Pleadings - Statement of defence - Traverse - Lewis & Peat v. Akhimien - The purport of that authority - Is that in respect of essential and material allegations - There should be no general traverse (H3) Eke v. Okwaranyia (2001) 4 KLR (pt. 120) 1181; (2001) 12 NWLR (Pt. 726) 181

JUDGMENTS - Procedure or style - Adopted by the court - In writing its judgment - Is not material - Once some important considerations are made (H3) Jekpe v. Alokwe (2001) 4 KLR (pt. 120) 985; (2001) 8 NWLR (Pt. 715) 252

JUDGMENTS - Of a court - Must be based - On only things pleaded - And supported by clear evidence (H3) Obulor v. Oboro (2001) 4 KLR (pt. 119) 1071; (2001) 8 NWLR (Pt. 714) 25

JUDGMENTS - Representative action - Judgments therein - Are not personal to the individuals - But would survive their death (H7) Jack v. Whyte (2001) 3 KLR (pt. 118) 937; (2001) 6 NWLR (Pt. 709) 266

JUDGMENTS - Res judicata - Counter claim - Where the judgment in a previous case could not avail the plaintiff - Dismissal of the defendant's counter claim - On the ground of res judicata - Is erroneous (H10) Ikeni v. Efamo (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 122) 1603; (2001) 10


INDEX OF SUBJECT MATTER ALL SC 2001 DECISIONS

NWLR (Pt. 720) 1

JUDGMENTS - Res judicata or issue estoppel - The judgment in a criminal case relied on - Cannot create estoppel - Because the parties and the issues - Are not the same in both actions (H5) Odonigi v. Oyeleke (2001) 2 KLR (pt. 116) 625; (2001) 6 NWLR (Pt. 708) 12

JUDGMENTS - Retrial - Civil case - Conditions under which an appellate court may order a retrial in a civil case (H6) Eke v. Okwaranyia (2001) 4 KLR (pt. 120) 1181; (2001) 12 NWLR (Pt. 726) 181

JUDGMENTS - Retrial - When a plaintiff's case has failed - A retrial order is inappropriate (H7) Eke v. Okwaranyia (2001) 4 KLR (pt. 120) 1181; (2001) 12 NWLR (Pt. 726) 181

JUDGMENTS - Slip - Which has not occasioned a miscarriage of justice - Cannot result in the appeal being allowed (H1) Ekpe v. Oke (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 121) 1505; (2001) 10 NWLR (Pt. 721) 341

JUDGMENTS - Vacation period - Judgment delivered during vacation period - To be a nullity - There should be evidence to that effect (H1) Menakaya v. Menakaya (2001) 9/10 KLR (pt. 129) 3037; (2001) 16 NWLR (Pt. 738) 203

JUDGMENTS - Void decision - Evidence - Judgment written without any evidence supporting the decision - Is void (H7) Menakaya v. Menakaya (2001) 9/10 KLR (pt. 129) 3037; (2001) 16 NWLR (Pt. 738) 203

JUDICIAL PRECEDENTS - Amendment of pleadings - The case of Laguro v Honsu - Is distinguishable from present case - As it was merely an amendment - To bring record - In line with evidence adduced (H6) Kode v. Yussuf (2001) 2 KLR (pt. 115) 457; (2001) 4 NWLR (Pt. 703) 392

JUDICIAL PRECEDENTS - Chieftaincy matters - Right to sue - Uwegba's case - Decided that Governor is to set up an inquiry -


INDEX OF SUBJECT MATTER ALL SC 2001 DECISIONS

Before coming to a decision under s.22(6) (b) of Bendel State Chieftaincy Law (H2) Abu v. Odugbo (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 126) 2299; (2001) 14 NWLR (Pt. 732) 45

JUDICIAL PRECEDENTS - Distinguishing - Affidavit - The authority of Nwosu v. Imo State Environmental Sanitation Authority is not applicable - And is distinguished (H4) Chairman N.P.C. v. Chairman Ikere LG.A (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 128) 2805; (2001) 13 NWLR (Pt. 731) 540

JUDICIAL PRECEDENTS - Distinguishing - The decision in Olowu v. Olowu - Is properly distinguished from the facts of this case (H5) Nteogwuile v. Otuo (2001) 6 KLR (pt. 125) 2205; (2001) 16 NWLR (Pt. 738) 58

JUDICIAL PRECEDENTS - Distinguishing - The distinction between common intention and common object - As held in R. v. Ofor - Does not apply to this case (H9) Alarape v. State (2001) 2 KLR (pt. 116) 543; (2001) 5 NWLR (Pt. 705) 79

JUDICIAL PRECEDENTS - Distinguishing - The procedure adopted in this case - Is distinguishable from that adopted in Mogaji v. Odofin - And occasioned no miscarriage of justice (H4) Jekpe v. Alokwe (2001) 4 KLR (pt. 120) 985; (2001) 8 NWLR (Pt. 715) 252

JUDICIAL PRECEDENTS - Distinguishing factors - Where facts and issues raised are not the same - A past Supreme Court decision will not be binding (H3) Abu v. Odugbo (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 126) 2299; (2001) 14 NWLR (Pt. 732) 45

JUDICIAL PRECEDENTS - Obiter dictum - The issue decided on - By the lower court - Was obiter - As it was not raised by the parties - And does not affect the final decision of the court (H1) Jack v. Whyte (2001) 3 KLR (pt. 118) 937; (2001) 6 NWLR (Pt. 709) 266

JUDICIAL PRECEDENTS - Ratio decidendi - Decision of the court - On issues joined by parties - Forms part of the ratio for the case (H 3)


INDEX OF SUBJECT MATTER ALL SC 2001 DECISIONS

Oyefolu v. Durosinmi (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 128) 2997; (2001) 16 NWLR (Pt. 738) 1

JUDICIAL PRECEDENTS - Stare decisis - Meaning of - The principle does not apply to decisions given per incuriam - And a court can depart from its earlier decision - If it was wrong (H8) Global Trans. Oceanico S.A. v. Free Ent. Ltd. (2001) 2 KLR (pt. 115) 521; (2001) 5 NWLR (Pt. 706) 426

JUDICIAL PRECEDENTS - Supreme Court - Conflicting decisions on the same point - Absence of - Will make the court follow its previous decision - Where the facts and issues are on all fours (H4) Abu v. Odugbo (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 126) 2299; (2001) 14 NWLR (Pt. 732) 45

JURISDICTION - Appeals - Once the appeal is determined - Based on a preliminary issue formulate by the court or parties - Any other discourse on other issues or on merits of the appeal - Is without jurisdiction and incompetent (H1) Gov. Kogi State v. Yakubu (2001) 3 KLR (pt. 118) 903

JURISDICTION - Arbitration - Conversion to courts judgment - The court has no jurisdiction - To convert the award into its judgment - Rather it will enter it as a judgment - And give effect to it - In the absence of a challenge (H3) Ras Pal Gazi Constr. Co. Ltd. v. F.C.D.A. (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 122) 1651; (2001) 10 NWLR (Pt. 722) 559

JURISDICTION - Arbitration - Jurisdiction of court - Is to give leave to enforce the award as a judgment - And not to tamper with it in any other way (H4) Ras Pal Gazi Constr. Co. Ltd. v. F.C.D.A. (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 122) 1651; (2001) 10 NWLR (Pt. 722) 559

JURISDICTION - Basis of - Trial court has jurisdiction to entertain the present suit - Based upon the statement of claim (H5) Abu v. Odugbo (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 126) 2299; (2001) 14 NWLR (Pt. 732) 45

JURISDICTION - Cause of action - Which arose before the jurisdic


INDEX OF SUBJECT MATTER ALL SC 2001 DECISIONS

tion of the court is ousted - Any further hearing of the matter is null and void - Because any decision it makes amounts to nothing (H5) Isaiah v. Shell Petroleum Ltd. (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 122) 1631; (2001) 11 NWLR (Pt. 723) 168

JURISDICTION - Contempt - Committal - Where any person refuses or neglects to comply with an order made against him - Other than for payment of money - The Court has ample jurisdiction to order that he be committed to prison (H3) Abbas v. Solomon (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 126) 2549; (2001) 15 NWLR (Pt. 735) 144

JURISDICTION - Federal High Court - Oil spillage - Spillage and Pollution which occurred in the course of repair of indented pipeline - Is a matter arising from - Mines and minerals including oil fields and oil mining - And falls within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Federal High Court - As provided under s. 230 (1) (a) of Decree No. 107 (H4) Isaiah v. Shell Petroleum Ltd. (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 122) 1631; (2001) 11 NWLR (Pt. 723) 168

JURISDICTION - Fundamental rights - Enforcement procedure - Principal claim - Where a each of the provisions of chapter IV is the principal claim - The procedure can be invoked even though other claims are made (H4) Dongtoe v. Civil Service Commission Plateau State (2001) 4 KLR (pt. 120) 1239; (2001) 9 NWLR (Pt. 717) 132

JURISDICTION - Fundamental rights - Enforcement procedure - The relief which may be claimed by means of the procedure - Is limited to any of the provisions of Chapter IV of the Constitution (H2) Dongtoe v. Civil Service Commission Plateau State (2001) 4 KLR (pt. 120) 1239; (2001) 9 NWLR (Pt. 717) 132

JURISDICTION - Importance of - The existence or absence of jurisdiction in the court - Goes to the root of the matter - And sustains or modifies the decision of the court in respect of the relevant subject matter (H1) Dongtoe v. Civil Service Commission Plateau State (2001) 4 KLR (pt. 120) 1239; (2001) 9 NWLR (Pt. 717) 132


INDEX OF SUBJECT MATTER ALL SC 2001 DECISIONS

JURISDICTION - Issue of jurisdiction - When it can be raised - The issue of jurisdiction can be raised at any stage of any proceedings - Even in an appeal before the Supreme Court (H1) Isaiah v. Shell Petroleum Ltd. (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 122) 1631; (2001) 11 NWLR (Pt. 723) 168

JURISDICTION - Issue of jurisdiction - When it should be considered - It is important to consider the issue of jurisdiction first - Because where a court exercises a jurisdiction it does not possess - Its decision amounts to a nullity (H2) Isaiah v. Shell Petroleum Ltd. (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 122) 1631; (2001) 11 NWLR (Pt. 723) 168

JURISDICTION - Land law - Customary right of occupancy - The High court has jurisdiction - To entertain a claim in respect of customary right of occupancy - As was rightly held by the court below (H1) Aseimo v. Abraham (2001) 6 KLR (pt. 124) 2125; (2001) 16 NWLR (Pt. 738) 20

JURISDICTION - Native court - Estoppel - The procedure adopted by the native court - Was in excess of jurisdiction - And its judgment was null - And cannot support an estoppel (H7) Achiakpa v. Nduka (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 126) 2487; (2001) 14 NWLR (Pt. 734) 623

JURISDICTION - Native or inferior courts - Their jurisdiction depends on statutes - To be proved by the party asserting the jurisdiction (H6) Achiakpa v. Nduka (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 126) 2487; (2001) 14 NWLR (Pt. 734) 623

JURISDICTION - Ouster - By a statute - The courts are obliged to uphold the ouster of its jurisdiction (H2) Miscellaneous Offences Tribunal v. Okoroafor (2001) 9/10 KLR (pt. 129) 3233; (2001) 18 NWLR (Pt. 745) 295

JURISDICTION - Ouster clause - Proceedings before a tribunal - Ouster of jurisdiction of High Court - Should not preclude it from determining - Whether the proceedings in question - Comes within the scope of power conferred by the enabling statute (H4) Miscella


INDEX OF SUBJECT MATTER ALL SC 2001 DECISIONS

neous Offences Tribunal v. Okoroafor (2001) 9/10 KLR (pt. 129) 3233; (2001) 18 NWLR (Pt. 745) 295

JURISDICTION - Ouster provision of a statute - Court reserves the right to consider - Whether the ouster clause ought to be obeyed (H3) Miscellaneous Offences Tribunal v. Okoroafor (2001) 9/10 KLR (pt. 129) 3233; (2001) 18 NWLR (Pt. 745) 295

JURISDICTION - Special procedure - Non compliance with - Where a special procedure is prescribed for the enforcement of a particular right or remedy - Non Compliance with such a procedure is fatal to the enforcement of the remedy (H3) Dongtoe v. Civil Service Commission Plateau State (2001) 4 KLR (pt. 120) 1239; (2001) 9 NWLR (Pt. 717) 132

JURISDICTION - Supreme Court - Constitutional Law - Dispute involving at least the interpretation of s. 162(2) of the 1999 constitution - Vests the court with jurisdiction - Even where the other issues might not be justiciable (H2) A-G Fed v. A-G Abia (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 127) 2599; (2001) 11 NWLR (Pt. 725) 689

JURISDICTION - What it means - And how it can be limited (H6) Isaiah v. Shell Petroleum Ltd. (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 122) 1631; (2001) 11 NWLR (Pt. 723) 168

LAND LAW - Appeals - Identity of land - Once the crucial issue of identity has failed - Plaintiff cannot succeed in his case - Even if other issues are decided in his favour (H3) Ibhafidon v. Igbinosun (2001) 4 KLR (pt. 120) 1167; (2001) 8 NWLR (Pt. 716) 653

LAND LAW - Appeals - Title - Identity of land - Location and identity of the parcel of land - Was clearly stated in the survey plan - And the courts below were in error to hold otherwise - And to decline to declare plaintiff owner of the land (H2) Onagoruwa v. Akinremi (2001) 6 KLR (pt. 124) 2055; (2001) 13 NWLR (Pt. 729) 38

LAND LAW - Boundaries - Injunction - Where the court below -


INDEX OF SUBJECT MATTER ALL SC 2001 DECISIONS

Finds that the boundaries are certain - Its order of injunction can only be challenged - If it is established that its finding is wrong - As regards identity of the land (H7) Aseimo v. Abraham (2001) 6 KLR (pt. 124) 2125; (2001) 16 NWLR (Pt. 738) 20

LAND LAW - Boundaries - Survey plan - Where there is clear evidence of boundaries - It will be perverse to rely on imprecise description of the land (H2) Basil v. Fajebe (2001) 4 KLR (pt. 120) 1273; (2001) 11 NWLR (Pt. 725) 592

LAND LAW - Certificate of occupancy - Where the issue of certificate of occupancy - Is rooted on no foundation - As no title exists or is available to be transferred to anyone - Then no title is or can be conferred by the certificate of occupancy (H11) Kyari v. Alkali (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 123) 1753; (2001) 11 NWLR (Pt. 724) 412

LAND LAW - Conveyancing - Exhibit - From the evidence in this case - The land in dispute was not within the land conveyed (H1) Basil v. Fajebe (2001) 4 KLR (pt. 120) 1273; (2001) 11 NWLR (Pt. 725) 592

LAND LAW - Co-ownership of land - Succession - Partition - Rights of Occupancy - When land has been held in co-ownership - Partitioning is an essential prerequisite - To a claim to any separate right (H9) Obasohan v. Omorodion (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 128) 3015; (2001) 13 NWLR (Pt. 729) 206

LAND LAW - Customary grant of land - Acts of ownership over the land - Can only be exercised according to the terms of the grant (H3) Ekpe v. Oke (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 121) 1505; (2001) 10 NWLR (Pt. 721) 341

LAND LAW - Customary law - Grant of land - By the chief and head of the family - With the concurrence of principal members - Is valid (H2) Temile v. Awani (2001) 6 KLR (pt. 125) 2159; (2001) 12 NWLR (Pt. 728) 726


INDEX OF SUBJECT MATTER ALL SC 2001 DECISIONS

LAND LAW - Customary right of occupancy - The High court has jurisdiction - To entertain a claim in respect of customary right of occupancy - As was rightly held by the court below (H1) Aseimo v. Abraham (2001) 6 KLR (pt. 124) 2125; (2001) 16 NWLR (Pt. 738) 20

LAND LAW - Customary tenancy - An absolute grant of land - Not limited by any condition - Is inconsistent with customary tenancy - As in this case (H3) Abimbola v. Abatan (2001) 4 KLR (pt. 120) 1149; (2001) 9 NWLR (Pt. 717) 66

LAND LAW - Customary tenancy - May be established - Without the payment of tribute (H2) Abimbola v. Abatan (2001) 4 KLR (pt. 120) 1149; (2001) 9 NWLR (Pt. 717) 66

LAND LAW - Declaration of title - Fresh action - Anchored on a previous judgment - Must be proved afresh - And the action will fail upon a successful defence of res judicata (H7) Ikeni v. Efamo (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 122) 1603; (2001) 10 NWLR (Pt. 720) 1

LAND LAW - Declaration of Title - Identity of disputed land - Where this is not the issue - No onus lies on the claimant - To prove the identity of the land (H2) Kyari v. Alkali (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 123) 1753; (2001) 11 NWLR (Pt. 724) 412

LAND LAW - Evidence - Burden of proof - Land matters - Where a plaintiff produces evidence - Entitling him to judgment - Defendant must lead evidence - To enable the court decide on which side the case preponderates (H5) Adeleke v. Iyanda (2001) 6 KLR (pt. 124) 1973; (2001) 13 NWLR (Pt. 729) 1

LAND LAW - Evidence - Statute - S. 145 Evidence Act - Where a person in possession of land - Is said to be a trespasser - He that so asserts must prove better title to the land (H5) Kyari v. Alkali (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 123) 1753; (2001) 11 NWLR (Pt. 724) 412

LAND LAW - Evidence - Title - Instrument conferring title - Obtain


INDEX OF SUBJECT MATTER ALL SC 2001 DECISIONS

ing of necessary consent - The burden of proving that the consent was obtained - Was on the party relying on the validity of the transaction (H7) Rockonoh Property Ltd. v. NITEL Plc. (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 128) 2871; (2001) 14 NWLR (Pt. 733) 468

LAND LAW - Exhibits - Document - Relevance - An exhibit that is not relevant - In proving exclusive possession - Is worthless (H5) Duru v. Onwumelu (2001) 12 KLR (pt. 130) 3287; (2001) 18 NWLR (Pt. 746) 672

LAND LAW - Fresh suit - Declaration of title - Obtained in a Native Court suit without a plan - The plaintiff is entitled to now seek a declaration tied to a plan (H6) Ikeni v. Efamo (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 122) 1603; (2001) 10 NWLR (Pt. 720) 1

LAND LAW - Grant of land - A second grant of the same piece of land - During the subsistence of the 1st grant - By the same authority - Is unjustifiable, unlawful, invalid and of no effect (H9) Kyari v. Alkali (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 123) 1753; (2001) 11 NWLR (Pt. 724) 412

LAND LAW - Grant of land - Land Use Act ss.36(2) & 6(1)(a) - A deemed grant of land - Is to all intents and purposes - Not different from an actual grant of land (H8) Kyari v. Alkali (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 123) 1753; (2001) 11 NWLR (Pt. 724) 412

LAND LAW - Identity of land - Where there is failure - Of both oral and documentary evidence to identify the land - Mere mention of names is not enough - And the claim must fail (H5) Babatola v. Aladejana (2001) 6 KLR (pt. 124) 2141; (2001) 12 NWLR (Pt. 728) 597

LAND LAW - Identity of the disputed land - Must be stated with clarity - In order to identify the land trespassed upon (H3) Babatola v. Aladejana (2001) 6 KLR (pt. 124) 2141; (2001) 12 NWLR (Pt. 728) 597

LAND LAW - Joint acquisition of property - Succession - Rights of


INDEX OF SUBJECT MATTER ALL SC 2001 DECISIONS

successors - Where the fathers of the parties have jointly acquired the property in which they lived until their death - What the rights of their successors are (H8) Obasohan v. Omorodion (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 128) 3015; (2001) 13 NWLR (Pt. 729) 206

LAND LAW - Joint ownership - Proof - A party claiming to be joint owners of a property - Need not prove root of title of the joint ownership - If he can prove a joint acquisition of the property (H1) Obasohan v. Omorodion (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 128) 3015; (2001) 13 NWLR (Pt. 729) 206

LAND LAW - Joint tenancy - Joint acquisition of property - Subject to customary law - Does not create joint tenancy in the meaning in which the term is known at common law (H4) Obasohan v. Omorodion (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 128) 3015; (2001) 13 NWLR (Pt. 729) 206

LAND LAW - Joint title - Statutory right of occupancy - Where joint title of land remained unreserved - Until partition has taken place - Separate entitlement of parties - Cannot be declared (H7) Obasohan v. Omorodion (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 128) 3015; (2001) 13 NWLR (Pt. 729) 206

LAND LAW - Laches & acquiescence - Title - The appellant could not have been mistaken - As to the true owner of the land - As the respondent's registered Deed - Served as a notice to him - And therefore his equitable defences must fail (H9) Kayode v. Odutola (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 123) 1861; (2001) 11 NWLR (Pt. 725) 659

LAND LAW - Land subject to customary law - S. 63(2) of the Property and Conveyancing Law - And s. 5 (3) of the Administration of Estate Law - Do not apply to land subject to customary law (H3) Obasohan v. Omorodion (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 128) 3015; (2001) 13 NWLR (Pt. 729) 206

LAND LAW - Land Use Act - Interpretation of s. 48 - The Act does not set aside existing laws - Including customary law and common


INDEX OF SUBJECT MATTER ALL SC 2001 DECISIONS

law (H5) Obasohan v. Omorodion (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 128) 3015; (2001) 13 NWLR (Pt. 729) 206

LAND LAW - Land Use Act - Revocation of Right of Occupancy s. 28(1) - In the absence of revocation of appellant's right by the governor - And payment of compensation to him - The statutory right of occupancy subsequently granted vide Exhibit B - Is tainted with illegality and is defective (H10) Kyari v. Alkali (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 123) 1753; (2001) 11 NWLR (Pt. 724) 412

LAND LAW - Land Use Act - Succession - Right of Occupancy - Deemed holders - Where parties' fathers died before commencement of the Act - And the parties succeeded to the interest of their fathers - They become deemed holders of statutory right of occupancy (H6) Obasohan v. Omorodion (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 128) 3015; (2001) 13 NWLR (Pt. 729) 206

LAND LAW - Location of land - As no issue was joined in the pleadings - As to certainty of the land in question - The evidence of the surveyor - Implying uncertainty goes to no issue (H3) Temile v. Awani (2001) 6 KLR (pt. 125) 2159; (2001) 12 NWLR (Pt. 728) 726

LAND LAW - Ownership of land - Once a party is proved to be the owner - Anyone who is on the land without his permission - Is a trespasser ab initio (H3) Onagoruwa v. Akinremi (2001) 6 KLR (pt. 124) 2055; (2001) 13 NWLR (Pt. 729) 38

LAND LAW - Possession - Acts of ownership - Demonstrated by the appellant cannot be brushed aside - Apart from this acts - Proof of ownership is proof of possession (H5) Basil v. Fajebe (2001) 4 KLR (pt. 120) 1273; (2001) 11 NWLR (Pt. 725) 592

LAND LAW - Possession - Adverse possession - Where both parties claim to be in possession - Possession would be presumed in favour of the party who shows a better title (H3) Biariko v. Edeh-Ogwuile (2001) 4 KLR (pt. 120) 1213; (2001) 12 NWLR (Pt. 726) 235


INDEX OF SUBJECT MATTER ALL SC 2001 DECISIONS

LAND LAW - Possession - Claim of possession by both parties - Preponderance of evidence is in favour of the appellants - Surveying and burying survey pillars - Can be evidence of possession (H4) Basil v. Fajebe (2001) 4 KLR (pt. 120) 1273; (2001) 11 NWLR (Pt. 725) 592

LAND LAW - Possession - Judgments - Dismissal of claim where there is no counter claim - Does not ipso facto lead to an order that the claimant - Should cease to enjoy the use and possession of the land in dispute (H5) Adone v. Ikebudu (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 126) 2363; (2001) 14 NWLR (Pt. 733) 385

LAND LAW - Proprietary right - Co-ownership - Identification of the rooms occupied by the co-owner - Will not be sufficient for creating absolute proprietary right - Over portions of the entire property (H11) Obasohan v. Omorodion (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 128) 3015; (2001) 13 NWLR (Pt. 729) 206

LAND LAW - Registration - Instrument - Consent - Presumption - When consent is endorsed on the instrument - It will raise a presumption of validity of the instrument (H5) Rockonoh Property Ltd. v. NITEL Plc. (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 128) 2871; (2001) 14 NWLR (Pt. 733) 468

LAND LAW - Registration - Instrument - Governor's consent - Lands Instrument Registration Law s. 10 - Registrar satisfaction as to Governor's consent - Is a matter of evidence (H4) Rockonoh Property Ltd. v. NITEL Plc. (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 128) 2871; (2001) 14 NWLR (Pt. 733) 468

LAND LAW - Registration - Instrument - Which does not have the necessary consent endorsed on it - The mere fact that such an instrument was registered - Will not raise the presumption of regularity to the effect that the consent was given (H6) Rockonoh Property Ltd. v. NITEL Plc. (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 128) 2871; (2001) 14 NWLR (Pt. 733) 468


INDEX OF SUBJECT MATTER ALL SC 2001 DECISIONS

LAND LAW - Right of occupancy - Rooms - There cannot be a statutory right of occupancy in relation to rooms in a building (H10) Obasohan v. Omorodion (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 128) 3015; (2001) 13 NWLR (Pt. 729) 206

LAND LAW - Sale - Title - Where from the evidence - It is clear that land conveyed did not include the land now in dispute - Court should hold that title had not been established (H3) Basil v. Fajebe (2001) 4 KLR (pt. 120) 1273; (2001) 11 NWLR (Pt. 725) 592

LAND LAW - Survey plan - Admissibility - Survey plan which is not prepared by a qualified surveyor - Is inadmissible - For failure to comply with s.3 Survey Law of Ondo State (H2) Babatola v. Aladejana (2001) 6 KLR (pt. 124) 2141; (2001) 12 NWLR (Pt. 728) 597

LAND LAW - Survey plan - Title - Court can grant a declaration of title - Without production of a survey plan by the plaintiff - As long as the land can be ascertained with certainty (H9) Temile v. Awani (2001) 6 KLR (pt. 125) 2159; (2001) 12 NWLR (Pt. 728) 726

LAND LAW - Survey plan - Title - Identity of land - Location and identity of the parcel of land - Was clearly stated in the survey plan - And the courts below were in error to hold otherwise - And to decline to declare plaintiff owner of the land (H2) Onagoruwa v. Akinremi (2001) 6 KLR (pt. 124) 2055; (2001) 13 NWLR (Pt. 729) 38

LAND LAW - Title - Acts of ownership - Demonstrated by the appellant cannot be brushed aside - Apart from this acts - Proof of ownership is proof of possession (H5) Basil v. Fajebe (2001) 4 KLR (pt. 120) 1273; (2001) 11 NWLR (Pt. 725) 592

LAND LAW - Title - Acts of ownership and possession - Must be numerous and positive - To warrant inference of exclusive ownership (H9) Achiakpa v. Nduka (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 126) 2487; (2001) 14 NWLR (Pt. 734) 623

LAND LAW - Title - As there is a distinction - Between grant of land


INDEX OF SUBJECT MATTER ALL SC 2001 DECISIONS

and settlement - Proof of a grant in this case - Does not amount to proof of title (H1) Kode v. Yussuf (2001) 2 KLR (pt. 115) 457; (2001) 4 NWLR (Pt. 703) 392

LAND LAW - Title - Claim for trespass - Puts title in issue - And plaintiff must prove ownership and or exclusive possession - In line with Idundun v. Okumagba (H1) Nwadiogbu v. Nnadozie (2001) 6 KLR (pt. 124) 2081; (2001) 12 NWLR (Pt. 727) 315

LAND LAW - Title - Consolidated actions - As both parties are plaintiffs - They each have a burden to convince the court - Of their superior title to the land (H7) Kenon v. Tekam (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 126) 2461; (2001) 14 NWLR (Pt. 732) 12

LAND LAW - Title - Cross action - Plaintiffs were able to discharge their burden of proof - On the balance of probabilities - Unlike the defendants (H8) Kenon v. Tekam (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 126) 2461; (2001) 14 NWLR (Pt. 732) 12

LAND LAW - Title - Equity - Laches & acquiescence - The acquiescence complained of - Must be fraudulent - And the delay must be combined - With plaintiffs knowledge of his cause of action - For the plea to succeed (H5) Kayode v. Odutola (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 123) 1861; (2001) 11 NWLR (Pt. 725) 659

LAND LAW - Title - Equity - Only a very high degree of acquiescence - And not mere lapse of time - Will lead to a loss of title by the original owner - In favour of an occupier - Which is not so in this case (H4) Kayode v. Odutola (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 123) 1861; (2001) 11 NWLR (Pt. 725) 659

LAND LAW - Title - Evidence - Plaintiff is required to satisfy the court by evidence - And not by admission in the defendants' pleadings - That he is entitled to the declaration of title (H7) Temile v. Awani (2001) 6 KLR (pt. 125) 2159; (2001) 12 NWLR (Pt. 728) 726

LAND LAW - Title - Evidence - Pleadings - Having led evidence - In


INDEX OF SUBJECT MATTER ALL SC 2001 DECISIONS

line with pleading - As to grant of land in dispute to him - Appellant cannot later ask to plead settlement instead of grant (H2) Kode v. Yussuf (2001) 2 KLR (pt. 115) 457; (2001) 4 NWLR (Pt. 703) 392

LAND LAW - Title - Identity of land - The land contested by both parties are the same - Going by the features in the different survey plans - Tendered by the parties (H14) Achiakpa v. Nduka (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 126) 2487; (2001) 14 NWLR (Pt. 734) 623

LAND LAW - Title - Instrument - Registration - Absence of necessary consent - The fact that the instrument was registered is not helpful - Because registration does not cure the defect in an instrument (H8) Rockonoh Property Ltd. v. NITEL Plc. (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 128) 2871; (2001) 14 NWLR (Pt. 733) 468

LAND LAW - Title - Judgment - Where the plaintiff fails - To satisfy the court - On the strength of his case - That he is entitled to declaration of title - The proper order is a dismissal of his claim (H4) Nwadiogbu v. Nnadozie (2001) 6 KLR (pt. 124) 2081; (2001) 12 NWLR (Pt. 727) 315

LAND LAW - Title - Proof - By traditional evidence and acts of ownership - The court is entitled to enquire - Into the sufficiency of the acts of ownership (H3) Aseimo v. Abraham (2001) 6 KLR (pt. 124) 2125; (2001) 16 NWLR (Pt. 738) 20

LAND LAW - Title - Proof - Long possession - Where it is the basis for plaintiffs' claim - They must prove numerous acts of ownership and possession - Over a sufficient length of time (H6) Duru v. Onwumelu (2001) 12 KLR (pt. 130) 3287; (2001) 18 NWLR (Pt. 746) 672

LAND LAW - Title - Proof - Onus of proof is on the party seeking the declaration - And he must succeed on the strength of his own case - Not the weakness of the defence (H6) Temile v. Awani (2001) 6 KLR (pt. 125) 2159; (2001) 12 NWLR (Pt. 728) 726

LAND LAW - Title - Proof by inference s. 46 Evidence Act - Based on


INDEX OF SUBJECT MATTER ALL SC 2001 DECISIONS

acts of possession over adjoining land - Does not avail the plaintiffs (H7) Duru v. Onwumelu (2001) 12 KLR (pt. 130) 3287; (2001) 18 NWLR (Pt. 746) 672

LAND LAW - Title - Proof by traditional evidence - What the plaintiff must prove - And how to resolve conflicting and rival traditional histories - By evidence of recent facts (H2) Aseimo v. Abraham (2001) 6 KLR (pt. 124) 2125; (2001) 16 NWLR (Pt. 738) 20

LAND LAW - Title - Proof of ownership - Where the title of the plaintiff's vendor is denied - The origin of the vendor's title - Has to be pleaded and proved by evidence (H2) Nwadiogbu v. Nnadozie (2001) 6 KLR (pt. 124) 2081; (2001) 12 NWLR (Pt. 727) 315

LAND LAW - Title - Root of title - A party claiming land - Is not bound to plead and prove more than one root of title to succeed (H4) Biariko v. Edeh-Ogwuile (2001) 4 KLR (pt. 120) 1213; (2001) 12 NWLR (Pt. 726) 235

LAND LAW - Title - Sale - Where from the evidence - It is clear that land conveyed did not include the land now in dispute - Court should hold that title had not been established (H3) Basil v. Fajebe (2001) 4 KLR (pt. 120) 1273; (2001) 11 NWLR (Pt. 725) 592

LAND LAW - Title - Standard of proof - Such cases are decided on balance of probability - As in all civil cases (H7) Adeleke v. Iyanda (2001) 6 KLR (pt. 124) 1973; (2001) 13 NWLR (Pt. 729) 1

LAND LAW - Title - Traditional evidence - The plaintiffs failed to prove the necessary facts - And their claim must fail (H12) Achiakpa v. Nduka (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 126) 2487; (2001) 14 NWLR (Pt. 734) 623

LAND LAW - Title - Traditional history - The principles in Kojo v Bonsie - When it will be resorted to (H5) Biariko v. Edeh-Ogwuile (2001) 4 KLR (pt. 120) 1213; (2001) 12 NWLR (Pt. 726) 235


INDEX OF SUBJECT MATTER ALL SC 2001 DECISIONS

LAND LAW - Title - Where family land is involved - Plaintiff must trace his title to the family - To succeed in his action for declaration of title (H8) Temile v. Awani (2001) 6 KLR (pt. 125) 2159; (2001) 12 NWLR (Pt. 728) 726

LAND LAW - Title to land - Any of the five methods of proving title to land - Will suffice independently to prove title to land (H12) Kyari v. Alkali (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 123) 1753; (2001) 11 NWLR (Pt. 724) 412

LAND LAW - Title to land - Declaration of - Plaintiff succeeds on the strength of his case _ And not on the weakness of the defence (H3) Adone v. Ikebudu (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 126) 2363; (2001) 14 NWLR (Pt. 733) 385

LAND LAW - Title to land - Documents - Merely tendering an instrument of title in court - Is only a prima facia evidence of title - But does not validate spurious or fraudulent instruments - Or an invalid transfer (H6) Kyari v. Alkali (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 123) 1753; (2001) 11 NWLR (Pt. 724) 412

LAND LAW - Title to land - Equitable defences - Registration of an instrument - Is not notice to all the world - And as appellant's title was not proved - His equitable defences of acquiescence and laches - Ought to have been rejected (H1) Kayode v. Odutola (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 123) 1861; (2001) 11 NWLR (Pt. 725) 659

LAND LAW - Title to land - Identity of Land - A declaration of title may be made - Without necessity of tying it to a survey plan - If no difficulty exists in identifying the land (H1) Kyari v. Alkali (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 123) 1753; (2001) 11 NWLR (Pt. 724) 412

LAND LAW - Trespass - Damages - Having failed to prove the identity of the trespassed land - The claim for damages must fail (H6) Babatola v. Aladejana (2001) 6 KLR (pt. 124) 2141; (2001) 12 NWLR (Pt. 728) 597

LAND LAW - Trespass - Proof - The onus is on the plaintiff - To


INDEX OF SUBJECT MATTER ALL SC 2001 DECISIONS

prove the identity of the land trespassed upon (H4) Babatola v. Aladejana (2001) 6 KLR (pt. 124) 2141; (2001) 12 NWLR (Pt. 728) 597

LAND LAW - Trespass - Whether or not there has been actual trespass - Can only be determined by the evidence led at trial - And no such evidence was led in this case (H4) Onagoruwa v. Akinremi (2001) 6 KLR (pt. 124) 2055; (2001) 13 NWLR (Pt. 729) 38

LAND LAW - Trespass to land - General damages - When general damages are sought on the basis of trespass to land - They would represent payment for the tort of trespass - Not the value of the land (H2) Rockonoh Property Ltd. v. NITEL Plc. (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 128) 2871; (2001) 14 NWLR (Pt. 733) 468

LAND LAW- Title - Traditional Evidence - Party relying on traditional evidence - Cannot plead vaguely - But must prove some facts - Such as who founded the land (H11) Achiakpa v. Nduka (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 126) 2487; (2001) 14 NWLR (Pt. 734) 623

LAND USE ACT - Certificate of occupancy - Where the issue of certificate of occupancy - Is rooted on no foundation - As no title exists or is available to be transferred to anyone - Then no title is or can be conferred by the certificate of occupancy (H11) Kyari v. Alkali (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 123) 1753; (2001) 11 NWLR (Pt. 724) 412

LAND USE ACT - Co-ownership of land - Succession - Partition - Rights of Occupancy - When land has been held in co-ownership - Partitioning is an essential prerequisite - To a claim to any separate right (H9) Obasohan v. Omorodion (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 128) 3015; (2001) 13 NWLR (Pt. 729) 206

LAND USE ACT - Deemed holders - Succession - Where parties' fathers died before commencement of the Act - And the parties succeeded to the interest of their fathers - They become deemed holders of statutory right of occupancy (H6) Obasohan v. Omorodion (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 128) 3015; (2001) 13 NWLR (Pt. 729) 206


INDEX OF SUBJECT MATTER ALL SC 2001 DECISIONS

LAND USE ACT - Grant of land - A second grant of the same piece of land - During the subsistence of the 1st grant - By the same authority - Is unjustifiable, unlawful, invalid and of no effect (H9) Kyari v. Alkali (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 123) 1753; (2001) 11 NWLR (Pt. 724) 412

LAND USE ACT - Grant of land - Land Use Act ss.36(2) & 6(1)(a) - A deemed grant of land - Is to all intents and purposes - Not different from an actual grant of land (H8) Kyari v. Alkali (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 123) 1753; (2001) 11 NWLR (Pt. 724) 412

LAND USE ACT - Interpretation of s. 48 - The Act does not set aside existing laws - Including customary law and common law (H5) Obasohan v. Omorodion (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 128) 3015; (2001) 13 NWLR (Pt. 729) 206

LAND USE ACT - Revocation of Right of Occupancy s. 28(1) - In the absence of revocation of appellant's right by the governor - And payment of compensation to him - The statutory right of occupancy subsequently granted vide Exhibit B - Is tainted with illegality and is defective (H10) Kyari v. Alkali (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 123) 1753; (2001) 11 NWLR (Pt. 724) 412

LAND USE ACT - Right of occupancy - Rooms - There cannot be a statutory right of occupancy in relation to rooms in a building (H10) Obasohan v. Omorodion (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 128) 3015; (2001) 13 NWLR (Pt. 729) 206

LAND USE ACT - Statutory right of occupancy by - Joint title - Where joint title of land remained unreserved - Until partition has taken place - Separate entitlement of parties - Cannot be declared (H7) Obasohan v. Omorodion (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 128) 3015; (2001) 13 NWLR (Pt. 729) 206

LAND USE ACT - Transfer of Title - Governor's consent - Will not be required to make the transfer valid - If the transfer was concluded -


INDEX OF SUBJECT MATTER ALL SC 2001 DECISIONS

Before the Land use Act came into force on 29th March 1978 (H1) Onagoruwa v. Akinremi (2001) 6 KLR (pt. 124) 2055; (2001) 13 NWLR (Pt. 729) 38

LEASES - Courts - Documents - Interpretation - The responsibility of the court - Is simply to give effect to the intention of the parties - And not to rewrite the lease agreement for the parties (H9) Unilife Dev. Co. Ltd. v. Adeshigbin (2001) 2 KLR (pt. 115) 387; (2001) 4 NWLR (Pt. 704) 609

LEGAL PRACTITIONERS - Authority of Counsel - At the trial of an action- Extends when it is not expressly limited - To the whole of the court action - But it does not fetter the discretion of the court (H9) Vulcan Gases Ltd. v. Gasellschaft Fur Industries (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 121) 1437; (2001) 9 NWLR (Pt. 719) 610

LEGAL PRACTITIONERS - Consent judgment - Authority of Counsel - Limitation - Where the authority of counsel has been expressly limited by the client - And if the limitation of authority is known to the other side - Consent of counsel outside the limits of his authority - Is of no effect (H12) Vulcan Gases Ltd. v. Gasellschaft Fur Industries (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 121) 1437; (2001) 9 NWLR (Pt. 719) 610

LEGAL PRACTITIONER - Consent judgment - Withdrawal of consent - Where counsel by the authority of his client consents to an order - The client cannot arbitrarily withdraw such consent (H10) Vulcan Gases Ltd. v. Gasellschaft Fur Industries (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 121) 1437; (2001) 9 NWLR (Pt. 719) 610

LEGAL PRACTITIONERS - Mistake of counsel - Consent judgment - Where counsel agreed to a consent order being made under misapprehension - The court will not hold him or his client to the agreement (H11) Vulcan Gases Ltd. v. Gasellschaft Fur Industries (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 121) 1437; (2001) 9 NWLR (Pt. 719) 610

LEGAL PRACTITIONERS - Mistake of counsel - Court will not punish a litigant - For the mistake of his counsel (H2) Ogundoyin v.


INDEX OF SUBJECT MATTER ALL SC 2001 DECISIONS

Adeyemi (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 127) 2687; (2001) 13 NWLR (Pt. 730) 403

LEGISLATION - Constitutional law - Separation of powers - Interpretation of s. 3(1) of the Constitution - Is a judicial function and not a legislative function - National Boundary Commission may have concurrent powers - In respect of the said section (H4) A-G Fed v. A-G Abia (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 127) 2599; (2001) 11 NWLR (Pt. 725) 689

LIBEL - Continuous publication - Cause of action - There is no concept of continuous publication in the law of defamation - Every publication and republication is complete in itself - In founding a cause of action (H1) Offoboche v. Ogoja L.G. (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 128) 2843; (2001) 16 NWLR (Pt. 739) 458

LIBEL - Damages - Assessment - Claim for non-pecuniary loss - Elements to be taken into account (H15) Offoboche v. Ogoja L.G. (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 128) 2843; (2001) 16 NWLR (Pt. 739) 458

LIBEL - Damages - Claim for non-pecuniary loss - Rationale for the award of damages for injured reputation (H14) Offoboche v. Ogoja L.G. (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 128) 2843; (2001) 16 NWLR (Pt. 739) 458

LIBEL - Damages - Claim of a single award - For several causes of action - Where the respondents were liable for only a few of the libels proved - And not entirely for the same instances of libel - Separate awards are called for (H12) Offoboche v. Ogoja L.G. (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 128) 2843; (2001) 16 NWLR (Pt. 739) 458

LIBEL - Damages - Success of the action before the Supreme Court - When erroneous excessive award of ten million naira - Will be reduced to N100,000.00 (H17) Offoboche v. Ogoja L.G. (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 128) 2843; (2001) 16 NWLR (Pt. 739) 458

LIBEL - Defamation - Evidence - As there was no evidence - That the respondent was indebted to the appellant - It was libellous - To hold


INDEX OF SUBJECT MATTER ALL SC 2001 DECISIONS

him out as unable to discharge the debt (H2) A.C.B. Ltd. v. Apugo (2001) 2 KLR (pt. 116) 653; (2001) 5 NWLR (Pt. 707) 483

LIBEL - Defamation - Justification - Defendant must prove strictly - The truth of every allegation of fact - And not the truth of every word - In the libel - In order to succeed - With this defence of justification (H1) A.C.B. Ltd. v. Apugo (2001) 2 KLR (pt. 116) 653; (2001) 5 NWLR (Pt. 707) 483

LIBEL - Defamatory materials - Reading it out to an audience - That know it was written - Such publication is libel and not slander (H9) Offoboche v. Ogoja L.G. (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 128) 2843; (2001) 16 NWLR (Pt. 739) 458

LIBEL - Express malice - Consideration of - An inquiry whether there is express malice is not necessary - Where the occasion is not privileged (H6) Offoboche v. Ogoja L.G. (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 128) 2843; (2001) 16 NWLR (Pt. 739) 458

LIBEL - Official duty - Exonerating factor - That a party had committed libel in the cause of performing his official duty - May not exonerate him from liability for libel - Unless the occasion of the publication was privileged (H16) Offoboche v. Ogoja L.G. (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 128) 2843; (2001) 16 NWLR (Pt. 739) 458

LIBEL - Statutes - Applicability - Public Officers Protection Law s. 2(a) - Artificial persons - The protection of that law is available to artificial persons (H10) Offoboche v. Ogoja L.G. (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 128) 2843; (2001) 16 NWLR (Pt. 739) 458

LIMITATION OF ACTIONS - Defamation - Qualified privilege - A person who claims that the action is statute-barred - Does not need to establish a defence of qualified privilege - In order to succeed in his plea (H7) Offoboche v. Ogoja L.G. (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 128) 2843; (2001) 16 NWLR (Pt. 739) 458

LIMITATION OF ACTIONS - Public Officers Protection law s. 2(a) -


INDEX OF SUBJECT MATTER ALL SC 2001 DECISIONS

Defamation - Action commenced within 3 months - Of the publication of the offending materials - Is not barred by that provision (H3) Offoboche v. Ogoja L.G. (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 128) 2843; (2001) 16 NWLR (Pt. 739) 458

LIMITATION OF ACTIONS - Statute bar - Plaintiff's action was filed within time - And is not statute barred (H2) Julius Berger Nig. Plc. v. Omogui (2001) 6 KLR (pt. 125) 2237; (2001) 15 NWLR (Pt. 736) 401

LOCUS STANDI - Actions - Bill of lading - Act of transfer of bill of lading to a clearing agent - Cannot divest the plaintiff of the right to sue - For loss of some of the goods (H4) Boothia Inc. v. Fareast Ltd. (2001) 4 KLR (pt. 119) 1107; (2001) 9 NWLR (Pt. 719) 572

LOCUS STANDI - Capacity to sue - The plaintiff must show sufficient interest - Or threat of injury he would suffer - Which he had failed to do - In this case (H2) Yesufu v. Gov. Edo State (2001) 6 KLR (pt. 124) 1997; (2001) 13 NWLR (Pt. 731) 517

LOCUS STANDI - Demurrer proceedings - Agency - Where there is no evidence that the plaintiff principal - Has divested itself of the right to sue - The action will not be struck out for want of locus (H3) Boothia Inc. v. Fareast Ltd. (2001) 4 KLR (pt. 119) 1107; (2001) 9 NWLR (Pt. 719) 572

LOCUS STANDI - Federal government - Federation account - Existence of justiciable dispute with defendants - Grants it the locus to sue (H6) A-G Fed v. A-G Abia (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 127) 2599; (2001) 11 NWLR (Pt. 725) 689

MANSLAUGHTER - Murder - Elements of - Under s. 316 CC - Where not established - When conviction for manslaughter will be substituted (H6) Amayo v. State (2001) 12 KLR (pt. 130) 3551; (2001) 18 NWLR (Pt. 745) 251

MASTER & SERVANT - Appointment - Power to appoint implies the


INDEX OF SUBJECT MATTER ALL SC 2001 DECISIONS

power to remove - Evidence shows that plaintiff was appointed by the defendant - And not by Federal Civil Service Commission (H3) Okomu Oil Ltd. v. Iserhienrhien (2001) 3 KLR (pt. 117) 797; (2001) 6 NWLR (Pt. 710) 660

MASTER & SERVANT - Banking - Criminal law - Banking malpractices irregularities and dishonest practices - Of which appellant was guilty - Does not constitute any offence known to our criminal law (H3) Olarewaju v. Afribank Nig. Plc. (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 126) 2395; (2001) 13 NWLR (Pt. 731) 691

MASTER & SERVANT - Categories of employment - The present case fails under master and servant (H5) Olarewaju v. Afribank Nig. Plc. (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 126) 2395; (2001) 13 NWLR (Pt. 731) 691

MASTER & SERVANT - Civil service Rules - Claim by servant that it regulated his employment - Where not proved - Mere classification of one as a public servant - Will not make the Rules applicable (H2) Okomu Oil Ltd. v. Iserhienrhien (2001) 3 KLR (pt. 117) 797; (2001) 6 NWLR (Pt. 710) 660

MASTER & SERVANT - Contract of service - Specific performance does not avail under present class - But wrongful termination - Will attract damages for wrongful dismissal (H6) Olarewaju v. Afribank Nig. Plc. (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 126) 2395; (2001) 13 NWLR (Pt. 731) 691

MASTER & SERVANT - Dismissal - As the letter of dismissal - Did not make any allegation of criminal nature - The case of Garba v. University of Maiduguri is inapplicable (H2) Olarewaju v. Afribank Nig. Plc. (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 126) 2395; (2001) 13 NWLR (Pt. 731) 691

MASTER & SERVANT - Dismissal - Criminal charges - Where the dismissal is based on a criminal charge - Such charge must first be proved in a court of law - Before the dismissal can stand (H1) Olarewaju v. Afribank Nig. Plc. (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 126) 2395; (2001) 13 NWLR (Pt. 731) 691


INDEX OF SUBJECT MATTER ALL SC 2001 DECISIONS

MASTER & SERVANT - Dismissal - Natural justice - The servant's appointment can lawfully be terminated - Without observing the principles of natural justice - To inform him and hear him first (H7) Olarewaju v. Afribank Nig. Plc. (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 126) 2395; (2001) 13 NWLR (Pt. 731) 691

MASTER & SERVANT - Dismissal - Reasons for - Master is under no obligation - To give reasons for terminating servant's appointment (H4) Olarewaju v. Afribank Nig. Plc. (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 126) 2395; (2001) 13 NWLR (Pt. 731) 691

MASTER & SERVANT - Parties - Federal civil service commission - Not being a party in the present action - Cannot be forced to take responsibility of plaintiff as its employer - When it did not employ him service of the Federation - As widely Defined in s.277 (1) of the 1979 Constitution - Is for purposes of code of conduct of public servants - It is not a ground for a worker being under authority - Of the Federal Civil Service Commission (H5) Okomu Oil Ltd. v. Iserhienrhien (2001) 3 KLR (pt. 117) 797; (2001) 6 NWLR (Pt. 710) 660

MASTER & SERVANT - Public officers - Decree No.17 of 1984 - Was meant to cover public officers - To conveniently relieve them of their appointments without any legal liability - The Decree is not applicable to the respondent (H6) Okomu Oil Ltd. v. Iserhienrhien (2001) 3 KLR (pt. 117) 797; (2001) 6 NWLR (Pt. 710) 660

MASTER & SERVANT - Public service of the Federation - As widely Defined in s.277 (1) of the 1979 Constitution - Is for purposes of code of conduct of public servants - It is not a ground for a worker being under authority - Of the Federal Civil Service Commission (H4) Okomu Oil Ltd. v. Iserhienrhien (2001) 3 KLR (pt. 117) 797; (2001) 6 NWLR (Pt. 710) 660

MASTER & SERVANT - Resignation of appointment - Need not be formally accepted by the employer - Before taking effect (H1) Yesufu


INDEX OF SUBJECT MATTER ALL SC 2001 DECISIONS

v. Gov. Edo State (2001) 6 KLR (pt. 124) 1997; (2001) 13 NWLR (Pt. 731) 517

MASTER & SERVANT - Retirement - Waiver of right of complaint - Conduct - Which did not suggest that the respondents gave up their right of action - Cannot preclude them from complaining about their retirement (H6) MILAD Benue State v. Ulegede (2001) 9/10 KLR (pt. 129) 3135; (2001) 17 NWLR (Pt. 741) 194

MASTER & SERVANT - Summary dismissal - Prosecution for gross misconduct - Where a servant is found guilty of gross misconduct - The employer can summarily dismiss him - Without first prosecuting him before the court (H8) Olarewaju v. Afribank Nig. Plc. (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 126) 2395; (2001) 13 NWLR (Pt. 731) 691

MASTER & SERVANT - Wrongful termination - Breach of terms of the contract of employment - Onus of proof in on the employee who filed the action (H1) Okomu Oil Ltd. v. Iserhienrhien (2001) 3 KLR (pt. 117) 797; (2001) 6 NWLR (Pt. 710) 660

MASTER & SERVANT - Wrongful termination - Reinstatement of servant - An employer cannot be compelled - To reinstate a dismissed servant - Except where the servant is protected by statute (H9) Olarewaju v. Afribank Nig. Plc. (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 126) 2395; (2001) 13 NWLR (Pt. 731) 691

MATRIMONIAL CAUSES - Dissolution of marriage - Proceedings - It is mandatory that proceedings in respect of petition for dissolution of marriage - Shall be in public (H2) Menakaya v. Menakaya (2001) 9/10 KLR (pt. 129) 3037; (2001) 16 NWLR (Pt. 738) 203

MATRIMONIAL CAUSES - Hearing in chambers - Based on consent of both counsel - Contrary to mandatory statutory provision - The proceedings and judgment - Are a nullity (H5) Menakaya v. Menakaya (2001) 9/10 KLR (pt. 129) 3037; (2001) 16 NWLR (Pt. 738) 203

MOTIONS - Appeals - S. 15 Kwara State Chiefs Edict No. 3 of 1998


INDEX OF SUBJECT MATTER ALL SC 2001 DECISIONS

- Does not apply - Where the issue is the appointment of a member of a Traditional Council - As in this case (H1) Ajayi v. Jolayemi (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 122) 1689; (2001) 10 NWLR (Pt. 722) 516

MURDER - Cause of death - Proof - By Medical evidence - Is not essential in certain circumstances (H10) Alarape v. State (2001) 2 KLR (pt. 116) 543; (2001) 5 NWLR (Pt. 705) 79

MURDER - Circumstantial evidence - The facts proved are cogent, unequivocal and conclusive - With unbroken chain of circumstances - Suggesting guilt of the appellant (H1) Nweke v. State (2001) 2 KLR (pt. 115) 501; (2001) 4 NWLR (Pt. 704) 588

MURDER - Identification of corpse - Will be sustained despite error in witness's testimony - If sufficient identification is established - And there is no miscarriage of justice (H4) Nweke v. State (2001) 2 KLR (pt. 115) 501; (2001) 4 NWLR (Pt. 704) 588

MURDER - Self Defence - In a hand to hand fight - Where the accused used a knife and stabbed the other who later died - Self defence is negatived. (H3) Odu v. State (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 122) 1551; (2001) 10 NWLR (Pt. 722) 668

NATURAL JUSTICE - Fair hearing - Denial of - Once proved - The whole proceedings automatically becomes vitiated - And is rendered null and void (H1) Ojengbede v. Esan (2001) 12 KLR (pt. 131) 3531; (2001) 18 NWLR (Pt. 746) 771

NATURAL JUSTICE - Master & servant - Dismissal - Natural justice - The servant's appointment can lawfully be terminated - Without observing the principles of natural justice - To inform him and hear him first (H7) Olarewaju v. Afribank Nig. Plc. (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 126) 2395; (2001) 13 NWLR (Pt. 731) 691

NEGLIGENCE - Contributory negligence - Burden of proof - Lies on the defendant - And the contributory negligence - Must be the cause of the accident (H2) Ololo v. Nig. Agip Oil (2001) 6 KLR (pt.


INDEX OF SUBJECT MATTER ALL SC 2001 DECISIONS

124) 2101; (2001) 13 NWLR (Pt. 729) 88

NEGLIGENCE - Contributory negligence - Damages - The measure of damages - Is apportioned according to the proportion - Of responsibility of the parties for the damage (H3) Ololo v. Nig. Agip Oil (2001) 6 KLR (pt. 124) 2101; (2001) 13 NWLR (Pt. 729) 88

ORDERS - Appeals - Leave - Interlocutory order or ruling - Appeal thereon - Must be brought within the time stipulated by s. 25 (2)(a) Court of Appeal Act - Or else leave of court should be obtained (H1) Oke v. Nwaogbuinya (2001) 1 KLR (pt. 114) 169

ORDERS - Appeals - Retrial - Procedure adopted by the trial court - Was merely a technical error - Which was not inconsistent with the rights of the parties - And does not warrant an order for retrial (H5) Jekpe v. Alokwe (2001) 4 KLR (pt. 119) 985; (2001) 8 NWLR (Pt. 715) 252

ORDERS - Null order - Setting aside - Outside the appellate procedure - An order can be set aside if it is a nullity (H6) Vulcan Gases Ltd. v. Gasellschaft Fur Industries (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 121) 1437; (2001) 9 NWLR (Pt. 719) 610

ORDERS - Retrial - Civil case - Conditions under which an appellate court may order a retrial in a civil case (H6) Eke v. Okwaranyia (2001) 4 KLR (pt. 120) 1181; (2001) 12 NWLR (Pt. 726) 181

ORDERS - Striking out or dismissal - Where an action is improperly constituted - The proper order to make is striking out - Not dismissal - And such order totally determines the case (H3) Gov. of Kogi State v. Yakubu (2001) 3 KLR (pt. 118) 903; (2001) 6 NWLR (Pt. 710) 521

ORDERS OF COURT - Reliefs sought - Order 3 r. 23 Court of Appeal - Must not be granted - The court is free to grant any other appropriate reliefs (H1) Onuaguluchi v. Ndu (2001) 3 KLR (pt. 117) 831; (2001) 7 NWLR (Pt. 712) 309


INDEX OF SUBJECT MATTER ALL SC 2001 DECISIONS

PARTIES - Contracts - As the respondent was not a party to the contract - It could not be bound by it - As the Court of Appeal rightly held (H8) Makwe v. Nwukor (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 126) 2573; (2001) 14 NWLR (Pt. 733) 356

PARTIES - Court processes - Non service of - Only the affected party can complain - About such a failure (H1) Chime v. Chime (2001) 1 KLR (pt. 114) 269; (2001) 3 NWLR (Pt. 701) 527

PARTIES - Cross appeal - Where respondents have not filed a cross appeal against corespondents - They cannot support appellant's motion - As they lack standing in respect of reliefs sought (H6) Adenuga v. Odumeru (2001) 1 KLR (pt. 114) 197; (2001) 2 NWLR (Pt. 696) 184

PARTIES - Inaction of a party - Where a party fails to exercise his right - To anticipate the case of a his opponent of which he had notice - He cannot complain on appeal - Of his own inaction (H6) Aseimo v. Abraham (2001) 6 KLR (pt. 124) 2125; (2001) 16 NWLR (Pt. 738) 20

PARTIES - Judgment - Court cannot give judgment against a person - Who was not made a party to the action - Or who had no opportunity to defend the suit (H8) Babatola v. Aladejana (2001) 6 KLR (pt. 125) 2141

PARTIES - Misjoinder - Where the decision is likely to affect some of the defendants - They are rightly joined - As necessary parties (H3) A-G Fed v. A-G Abia (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 127) 2599; (2001) 11 NWLR (Pt. 725) 689

PARTIES - Necessary parties - As there was no complaint made - Against the Governor in this case - It would have been wrong to join him - In the proceedings (H2) Ajayi v. Jolayemi (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 122) 1689; (2001) 10 NWLR (Pt. 722) 516


INDEX OF SUBJECT MATTER ALL SC 2001 DECISIONS

PARTNERSHIP LAW - Action - Parties - A firm composed of two or more partners - May sue or be sued in the firm's name (H1) Iyke Medical Merchandise v. Pfizer Inc. (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 121) 1377; (2001) 10 NWLR (Pt. 722) 540

PARTNERSHIP LAW - Action - Parties - A plaintiff who sues such partners in their firm's name - Is taken to have sued than individually (H2) Iyke Medical Merchandise v. Pfizer Inc. (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 121) 1377; (2001) 10 NWLR (Pt. 722) 540

PETROLEUM LAW - Jurisdiction - Oil spillage - Spillage and Pollution which occurred in the course of repair of indented pipeline - Is a matter arising from - Mines and minerals including oil fields and oil mining - And falls within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Federal High Court - As provided under s. 230 (1) (a) of Decree No. 107 (H4) Isaiah v. Shell Petroleum Ltd. (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 122) 1631; (2001) 11 NWLR (Pt. 723) 168

PETROLEUM LAW - Mining operations - Construction and maintenance of an oil pipeline - By a holder of oil prospecting licence - Is an act pertaining to mining operations (H3) Isaiah v. Shell Petroleum Ltd. (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 122) 1631; (2001) 11 NWLR (Pt. 723) 168

PLEADINGS - Absence of pleading - Company meeting minutes - As the issue was not pleaded - But merely arose in cross examination - It goes to no issue (H3) Nsirim v. Onuma Construction Co. Ltd. (2001) 3 KLR (pt. 118) 853; (2001) 7 NWLR (Pt. 713) 742

PLEADINGS - Actions - Dispute - Averments in pleading as to existence of a dispute - Are to be taken as true ex facie - Towards sustaining the action (H1) A-G Fed v. A-G Abia (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 127) 2599; (2001) 11 NWLR (Pt. 725) 689

PLEADINGS - Actions - Frivolity of - Issues raised by the statement of claim - Are not frivolous or vexatious - To warrant granting of the preliminary objections (H9) A-G Fed v. A-G Abia (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 127) 2599; (2001) 11 NWLR (Pt. 725) 689


INDEX OF SUBJECT MATTER ALL SC 2001 DECISIONS

PLEADINGS - Admissions - Any allegation of fact - In the statement of claim - Not denied specifically or by implication - Is deemed admitted - And the court was in error - To demand proof of such facts from the plaintiff (H3) Kyari v. Alkali (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 123) 1753; (2001) 11 NWLR (Pt. 724) 412

PLEADINGS - Admissions - Evidence - Facts admitted or not disputed by the defence - Need no further proof by evidence (H1) Temile v. Awani (2001) 6 KLR (pt. 125) 2159; (2001) 12 NWLR (Pt. 728) 726

PLEADINGS - Admitted facts - Cannot be retracted - And does not need further proof by evidence - But it is binding and can be acted upon by the court (H1) Adeye v. Adesanya (2001) 2 KLR (pt. 116) 595; (2001) 6 NWLR (Pt. 708) 1

PLEADINGS - Amendment - Appellate court should not use its discretion - To give approval for an amendment - Prompted by the findings of trial court - In favour of one party (H5) Kode v. Yussuf (2001) 2 KLR (pt. 115) 457; (2001) 4 NWLR (Pt. 703) 392

PLEADINGS - Amendment - Could be allowed at any time - Except in certain circumstances (H3) Kode v. Yussuf (2001) 2 KLR (pt. 115) 457; (2001) 4 NWLR (Pt. 703) 392

PLEADINGS - Amendment - The case of Laguro v Honsu - Is distinguishable from present case - As it was merely an amendment - To bring record - In line with evidence adduced (H6) Kode v. Yussuf (2001) 2 KLR (pt. 115) 457; (2001) 4 NWLR (Pt. 703) 392

PLEADINGS - Amendment - Which is designed to overreach - By making a ground of appeal useless - Constitutes an abuse of process of court - And ought to be dismissed (H4) Kode v. Yussuf (2001) 2 KLR (pt. 115) 457; (2001) 4 NWLR (Pt. 703) 392

PLEADINGS - Amendment sought on appeal - Is incompetent - As it will require defendant - To amend his statement of defence - And lead new evidence thereon - Giving the case a completely different


INDEX OF SUBJECT MATTER ALL SC 2001 DECISIONS

complexion (H7) Kode v. Yussuf (2001) 2 KLR (pt. 115) 457; (2001) 4 NWLR (Pt. 703) 392

PLEADINGS - Arbitration - Customary arbitration - Validity of - Ingredients that must be pleaded and proved (H5) Eke v. Okwaranyia (2001) 4 KLR (pt. 120) 1181; (2001) 12 NWLR (Pt. 726) 181

PLEADINGS - Contributory Negligence - May be pleaded - By adducing facts to that effect - Without specifically mentioning the defence by name (H1) Ololo v. Nig. Agip Oil (2001) 6 KLR (pt. 124) 2101; (2001) 13 NWLR (Pt. 729) 88

PLEADINGS - Cross examination - Evidence - Which is not material - To any issue raised by the pleading - May be disregarded - Even though obtained in cross examination (H2) Kayode v. Odutola (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 123) 1861; (2001) 11 NWLR (Pt. 725) 659

PLEADINGS - Cross examination - The admission obtained - From the defendant during cross examination - Went to negative his own pleaded fact - And was therefore admissible - Though not pleaded by the plaintiff (H3) Kayode v. Odutola (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 123) 1861; (2001) 11 NWLR (Pt. 725) 659

PLEADINGS - Damages - General Damages - Quantum - General damages are always made as a claim at large - The quantum need not be pleaded and proved (H1) Rockonoh Property Ltd. v. NITEL Plc. (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 128) 2871; (2001) 14 NWLR (Pt. 733) 468

PLEADINGS - Declaratory relief - Evidence - To obtain a declaratory relief as to a right - There has to be evidence - The right will not be conferred simply upon the state of the pleadings (H4) Eke v. Okwaranyia (2001) 4 KLR (pt. 120) 1181; (2001) 12 NWLR (Pt. 726) 181

PLEADINGS - Defamation - Qualified privilege - Where a defendant raises a defence of privilege - He should as a matter of pleadings aver the facts on which the defence is based (H8) Offoboche v. Ogoja L.G. (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 128) 2843; (2001) 16 NWLR (Pt. 739) 458


INDEX OF SUBJECT MATTER ALL SC 2001 DECISIONS

PLEADINGS - Defamation - Single publication - Cause of action - Pleading - A party who makes one single publication the foundation of his cause of action - Cannot extend the period of accrual of cause of action - Merely by pleading further publications (H2) Offoboche v. Ogoja L.G. (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 128) 2843; (2001) 16 NWLR (Pt. 739) 458

PLEADINGS - Defence - It is not for a court to speculate what defences - May have been available to a defendant (H11) Offoboche v. Ogoja L.G. (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 128) 2843; (2001) 16 NWLR (Pt. 739) 458

PLEADINGS - Defendant cannot rely on a defence - Which was open to him - But was not pleaded at the trial court (H11) IBWA v. Imano Ltd. (2001) 3 KLR (pt. 118) 873

PLEADINGS - Estoppel - Res judicata - Must be specifically pleaded - And not casually pleaded (H3) Achiakpa v. Nduka (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 126) 2487; (2001) 14 NWLR (Pt. 734) 623

PLEADINGS - Evidence - Fair hearing - Evidence must be directed and confined - To proof or disproof of issues - As settled by the parties in their pleadings -To avoid denial of fair hearing to any of the parties (H4) Kyari v. Alkali (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 123) 1753; (2001) 11 NWLR (Pt. 724) 412

PLEADINGS - Evidence - Having led evidence - In line with pleading - As to grant of land in dispute to him - Appellant cannot later ask to plead settlement instead of grant (H2) Kode v. Yussuf (2001) 2 KLR (pt. 115) 457; (2001) 4 NWLR (Pt. 703) 392

PLEADINGS - Evidence - Pleadings do not amount to evidence - And failure to adduce evidence in challenge of evidence of plaintiff - Is deemed to be acceptance of his evidence - Despite the general traverse (H9) IBWA v. Imano Ltd. (2001) 3 KLR (pt. 118) 873

PLEADINGS - Issue - Joinder of issue - In determining whether issue


INDEX OF SUBJECT MATTER ALL SC 2001 DECISIONS

has been joined on a point - It is not proper to consider a particular paragraph of the statement of defence - In isolation of the other paragraphs (H1) Eke v. Okwaranyia (2001) 4 KLR (pt. 120) 1181; (2001) 12 NWLR (Pt. 726) 181

PLEADINGS - Issues - Evidence - Trial judge was in error - To have based his conclusion - On facts neither pleaded nor testified to in evidence - By the parties (H1) Nteogwuile v. Otuo (2001) 6 KLR (pt. 125) 2205; (2001) 16 NWLR (Pt. 738) 58

PLEADINGS - issues - Where a party fails to submit his pleaded issues for trial - Or to call evidence in its support - The court may resolve such issues against him (H8) IBWA v. Imano Ltd. (2001) 3 KLR (pt. 118) 873

PLEADINGS - Joinder of issues - Appeals - The lower courts - Were in error - To have held that issue of title - Did not arise for determination - When issues had been joined in the pleadings - On that point (H3) Nwadiogbu v. Nnadozie (2001) 6 KLR (pt. 124) 2081; (2001) 12 NWLR (Pt. 727) 315

PLEADINGS - Judgment - Of a court - Must be based - On only things pleaded - And supported by clear evidence (H3) Obulor v. Oboro (2001) 4 KLR (pt. 119) 1071; (2001) 8 NWLR (Pt. 714) 25

PLEADINGS - Location of land - As no issue was joined in the pleadings - As to certainty of the land in question - The evidence of the surveyor - Implying uncertainty goes to no issue (H3) Temile v. Awani (2001) 6 KLR (pt. 125) 2159; (2001) 12 NWLR (Pt. 728) 726

PLEADINGS - Practice & Procedure - Evidence - Representative capacity - Where the pleadings and the evidence of a party - Disclose a representative capacity - Judgment can be entered for such a party - Even if an amendment to reflect that capacity has not been obtained (H14) Kyari v. Alkali (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 123) 1753; (2001) 11 NWLR (Pt. 724) 412

PLEADINGS - Purpose and procedure - The purpose of pleadings is


INDEX OF SUBJECT MATTER ALL SC 2001 DECISIONS

to bring the parties to issues that arise - But there is no obligation to set out the subordinate facts that may help as evidentiary material (H2) Eke v. Okwaranyia (2001) 4 KLR (pt. 120) 1181; (2001) 12 NWLR (Pt. 726) 181

PLEADINGS - Purpose of - Is to avoid surprise to the other party - And all the facts relied upon - Must be pleaded (H4) Nsirim v. Onuma Construction Co. Ltd. (2001) 3 KLR (pt. 118) 853; (2001) 7 NWLR (Pt. 713) 742

PLEADINGS - Reliefs not claimed - Where gratuitously made are incompetent and will be set aside - But will not affect courts judgment - As it is consequential to the judgment (H3) Adeye v. Adesanya (2001) 2 KLR (pt. 116) 595; (2001) 6 NWLR (Pt. 708) 1

PLEADINGS - Reliefs sought - Where they are claimed per writ of summons - And defendant fails to object to the irregularity before pleading to it - And there is no miscarriage of justice - The issue cannot be raised on appeal (H5) Ajayi v. Jolayemi (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 122) 1689; (2001) 10 NWLR (Pt. 722) 516

PLEADINGS - Statement of claim - Defect - Where a party claims as per writ of summons - The statement of claim is not defective thereby (H7) Okomu Oil Ltd. v. Iserhienrhien (2001) 3 KLR (pt. 117) 797; (2001) 6 NWLR (Pt. 710) 660

PLEADINGS - Statement of defence - Traverse - Lewis & Peat v. Akhimien - The purport of that authority - Is that in respect of essential and material allegations - There should be no general traverse (H3) Eke v. Okwaranyia (2001) 4 KLR (pt. 120) 1181; (2001) 12 NWLR (Pt. 726) 181

PLEADINGS - Title - Evidence - Plaintiff is required to satisfy the court by evidence - And not by admission in the defendants' pleadings - That he is entitled to the declaration of title (H7) Temile v. Awani (2001) 6 KLR (pt. 125) 2159; (2001) 12 NWLR (Pt. 728) 726


INDEX OF SUBJECT MATTER ALL SC 2001 DECISIONS

POWER OF ATTORNEY - Exercise of - Power of attorney - Does not divest the donor - Of power to deal with his property - As far as donee has not exercised such power (H6) Chime v. Chime (2001) 1 KLR (pt. 114) 269; (2001) 3 NWLR (Pt. 701) 527

PRACTICE & PROCEDURE - Action - Parties - Business name - A person carrying on business in a name or style other than his own name - May be sued in such name or style - But cannot sue in his trade name (H3) Iyke Medical Merchandise v. Pfizer Inc. (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 121) 1377; (2001) 10 NWLR (Pt. 722) 540

PRACTICE & PROCEDURE - Action - Parties - Partnership and Business name - Ascertaining the name of the proprietor - For the purpose of suing them - Is not necessary (H4) Iyke Medical Merchandise v. Pfizer Inc. (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 121) 1377; (2001) 10 NWLR (Pt. 722) 540

PRACTICE & PROCEDURE - Fundamental rights - Enforcement procedure - Principal claim - Where a each of the provisions of chapter IV is the principal claim - The procedure can be invoked even though other claims are made (H4) Dongtoe v. Civil Service Commission Plateau State (2001) 4 KLR (pt. 120) 1239; (2001) 9 NWLR (Pt. 717) 132

PRACTICE & PROCEDURE - Action - Parties - Partnership - A firm composed of two or more partners - May sue or be sued in the firm's name (H1) Iyke Medical Merchandise v. Pfizer Inc. (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 121) 1377; (2001) 10 NWLR (Pt. 722) 540

PRACTICE & PROCEDURE - Action - Parties - Unincorporated business enterprise - Can be sued eo nomine - And there is no need to first ascertain the nature of ownership of an unincorporated business enterprise - Before determining whether it can be sued eo nomine (H5) Iyke Medical Merchandise v. Pfizer Inc. (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 121) 1377; (2001) 10 NWLR (Pt. 722) 540

PRACTICE & PROCEDURE - Actions - Dispute - Averments in plead


INDEX OF SUBJECT MATTER ALL SC 2001 DECISIONS

ing as to existence of a dispute - Are to be taken as true ex facie - Towards sustaining the action (H1) A-G Fed v. A-G Abia (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 127) 2599; (2001) 11 NWLR (Pt. 725) 689

PRACTICE & PROCEDURE - Administration of estates - Coadministrator of an intestate - Application to be joined as a party in a suit - Can be brought by motion (H7) Igunbor v. Afolabi (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 121) 152; (2001) 11 NWLR (Pt. 723) 148

PRACTICE & PROCEDURE - Administration of Estates - Probate - Interlocutory matter relating to probate - Is required to be initiated by way of motion (H8) Igunbor v. Afolabi (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 121) 152; (2001) 11 NWLR (Pt. 723) 148

PRACTICE & PROCEDURE - Amendment - Effect - An order of amendment takes effect - Not from the date when the amendment is made or granted - But from the date of the commencement of the action (H4) Vulcan Gases Ltd. v. Gasellschaft Fur Industries (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 121) 1437; (2001) 9 NWLR (Pt. 719) 610

PRACTICE & PROCEDURE - Appeal - Leave - Issue - Fresh issue - When an issue not raised in the Court below - Is sought to be raised as a fresh point in the Supreme Court - Leave to do so must be sought and obtained (H3) Rockonoh Property Ltd. v. NITEL Plc. (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 128) 2871; (2001) 14 NWLR (Pt. 733) 468

PRACTICE & PROCEDURE - Appeals - Grounds of appeal - Alleging error in law and misdirection in fact - Is not ipso facto incompetent - If it otherwise complies with the rules of court (H2) Hambe v. Hueze (2001) 2 KLR (pt. 115) 437; (2001) 4 NWLR (Pt. 703) 372

PRACTICE & PROCEDURE - Appeals - Orders - Where an action is improperly constituted - The proper order to make is striking out - Not dismissal - And such order totally determines the case (H3) Gov. of Kogi State v. Yakubu (2001) 3 KLR (pt. 118) 903; (2001) 6 NWLR (Pt. 710) 521

PRACTICE & PROCEDURE - Appeals - Submissions - Every com


INDEX OF SUBJECT MATTER TO NOVEL CA DECISIONS

plaint or submission of appellants - Should be backed up by specific facts - To enable the court fairly decide on them (H15) Udoebre v. State (2001) 6 KLR (pt. 124) 1945; (2001) 12 NWLR (Pt. 728) 617

PRACTICE & PROCEDURE - Burden of proof - As nothing in the defendants case - Supported that of the plaintiff - Plaintiff must rely on the strength of his own case (H1) Abimbola v. Abatan (2001) 4 KLR (pt. 120) 1149; (2001) 9 NWLR (Pt. 717) 66

PRACTICE & PROCEDURE - Claims - Departure from endorsed claim - Gives rise to new cause of action - For which the court's jurisdiction has not been invoked (H2) Adenuga v. Odumeru (2001) 1 KLR (pt. 114) 197; (2001) 2 NWLR (Pt. 696) 184

PRACTICE & PROCEDURE - Claims - Reliefs sought must be within the scope of the claim - As plaintiff is limited by his claim (H1) Adenuga v. Odumeru (2001) 1 KLR (pt. 114) 197; (2001) 2 NWLR (Pt. 696) 184

PRACTICE & PROCEDURE - Courts - Writ of summons - Pleadings - Representative capacity - Failure to indicate this capacity on the writ of summons - Will not ipso facto invalidate the proceedings - As the appellate court - May suo motu amend the title - Once the pleadings and evidence so indicate (H15) Kyari v. Alkali (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 123) 1753; (2001) 11 NWLR (Pt. 724) 412

PRACTICE & PROCEDURE - Cross appeal - Where respondents have not filed a cross appeal against corespondents - They cannot support appellants' motion - As they lack standing in respect of reliefs sought (H6) Adenuga v. Odumeru (2001) 1 KLR (pt. 114) 197; (2001) 2 NWLR (Pt. 696) 184

PRACTICE & PROCEDURE - Damages - Appeal court may upset the award of damages - By trial court if a wrong principle of law was applied (H6) A.C.B. Ltd. v. Apugo (2001) 2 KLR (pt. 116) 653; (2001) 5 NWLR (Pt. 707) 483

PRACTICE & PROCEDURE - Defective notice of appeal - Without


INDEX OF SUBJECT MATTER TO NOVEL CA DECISIONS

any competent or valid ground of appeal - Cannot be cured by filing amended grounds out of time - And the appeal should be struck out (H4) Global Trans. Oceanico S.A. v. Free Ent. Ltd. (2001) 2 KLR (pt. 115) 521; (2001) 5 NWLR (Pt. 706) 426

PRACTICE & PROCEDURE - Dissolution of marriage - Proceedings - It is mandatory that proceedings in respect of petition for dissolution of marriage - Shall be in public (H2) Menakaya v. Menakaya (2001) 9/10 KLR (pt. 129) 3037; (2001) 16 NWLR (Pt. 738) 203

PRACTICE & PROCEDURE - Evaluation - Error of trial - Where the trial judge dismissed plaintiff's entire claim - Without evaluating evidence - He was in error - And retrial would have been ordered - If he had closed his judgment at that stage (H1) Jekpe v. Alokwe (2001) 4 KLR (pt. 120) 985; (2001) 8 NWLR (Pt. 715) 252

PRACTICE & PROCEDURE - Evidence - Affidavit - Containing diametrically opposing material facts - Must be resolved by viva voce evidence - Not by picking and choosing which to believe (H1) First Bank v. May Medical Clinics (2001) 4 KLR (pt. 120) 1023; (2001) 9 NWLR (Pt. 717) 28

PRACTICE & PROCEDURE - Evidence - Affidavits - Hurried proceedings - Proceedings should not be hurried at the expense of justice - As it may amount to a burying of justice (H6) Chairman N.P.C. v. Chairman Ikere LG.A (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 128) 2805; (2001) 13 NWLR (Pt. 731) 540

PRACTICE & PROCEDURE - Evidence - Affidavits - Whether a case may be heard entirely on affidavit evidence or not - Is determined by the nature of the issues - Whether they are of contentious facts or not (H2) Chairman N.P.C. v. Chairman Ikere LG.A (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 128) 2805; (2001) 13 NWLR (Pt. 731) 540

PRACTICE & PROCEDURE - Evidence - Proof - Respondents had proved their case - On the balance of probabilities - And their claim had been rightly upheld by the lower court (H6) Abidoye v. Alawode (2001) 3 KLR (pt. 118) 917; (2001) 6 NWLR (Pt. 709) 463


INDEX OF SUBJECT MATTER TO NOVEL CA DECISIONS

PRACTICE & PROCEDURE - Fair hearing - Technicalities - Once procedure for fair hearing is or is not complied with - Incorrect citation of relevant provisions does not matter (H2) Psychiatric Hospitals Board v. Edosa (2001) 2 KLR (pt. 116) 3531; (2001) 5 NWLR (Pt. 707) 612

PRACTICE & PROCEDURE - Findings - On evidence and issues - Not before the court is unacceptable - But where supported by ample evidence - The findings will be affirmed (H6) Odonigi v. Oyeleke (2001) 2 KLR (pt. 116) 625; (2001) 6 NWLR (Pt. 708) 12

PRACTICE & PROCEDURE - Fresh points - Will not ordinarily be entertained - If lower court had not expressed its view - Or is better placed to deal with it (H3) Global Trans. Oceanico S.A. v. Free Ent. Ltd. (2001) 2 KLR (pt. 115) 521; (2001) 5 NWLR (Pt. 706) 426

PRACTICE & PROCEDURE - Fundamental Rights - Enforcement of under 1979 Rules - Chieftaincy disputes cannot be enforced under this Rule - As properly held by the lower courts (H2) Gov. of Kogi State v. Yakubu (2001) 3 KLR (pt. 118) 903; (2001) 6 NWLR (Pt. 710) 521

PRACTICE & PROCEDURE - Fundamental Rights - Enforcement procedure - The relief which may be claimed by means of the procedure - Is limited to any of the provisions of Chapter IV of the Constitution (H2) Dongtoe v. Civil Service Commission Plateau State (2001) 4 KLR (pt. 120) 1239; (2001) 9 NWLR (Pt. 717) 132

PRACTICE & PROCEDURE - Ground of appeal - Which has been struck out - Cannot be used as basis for a decision or judgment (H6) Global Trans. Oceanico S.A. v. Free Ent. Ltd. (2001) 2 KLR (pt. 115) 521; (2001) 5 NWLR (Pt. 706) 426

PRACTICE & PROCEDURE - Grounds of appeal - Alleging error or misdirection - But fails to provide particulars of such error or misdirection - Is incompetent and liable to be struck out (H1) Global Trans. Oceanico S.A. v. Free Ent. Ltd. (2001) 2 KLR (pt. 115) 521; (2001)


INDEX OF SUBJECT MATTER TO NOVEL CA DECISIONS

5 NWLR (Pt. 706) 426

PRACTICE & PROCEDURE - Grounds of appeal - If framed to contain particulars of error or misdirection complained of - Without setting them out in different headings - Is competent and is rightly entertained (H5) Global Trans. Oceanico S.A. v. Free Ent. Ltd. (2001) 2 KLR (pt. 115) 521; (2001) 5 NWLR (Pt. 706) 426

PRACTICE & PROCEDURE - Grounds of appeal - If supported by sufficient facts - Enough to eliminate ambiguity - Should not be struck out due to technicalities (H1) Odonigi v. Oyeleke (2001) 2 KLR (pt. 116) 625; (2001) 6 NWLR (Pt. 708) 12

PRACTICE & PROCEDURE - Hearing in chambers - Based on consent of both counsel - Contrary to mandatory statutory provision - The proceedings and judgment - Are a nullity (H5) Menakaya v. Menakaya (2001) 9/10 KLR (pt. 129) 3037; (2001) 16 NWLR (Pt. 738) 203

PRACTICE & PROCEDURE - Irregular procedure - If consented to by the defendant at trial - Cannot be complained against on appeal - By the said defendant (H4) IBWA v. Imano Ltd. (2001) 3 KLR (pt. 118) 873

PRACTICE & PROCEDURE - Issues - Amounting to academic exercise - Will not be entertained by the court as in this case (H7) Global Trans. Oceanico S.A. v. Free Ent. Ltd. (2001) 2 KLR (pt. 115) 521; (2001) 5 NWLR (Pt. 706) 426

PRACTICE & PROCEDURE - Issues - Pleadings - Where a party fails to submit his pleaded issues for trial - Or to call evidence in its support - The court may resolve such issues against him (H8) IBWA v. Imano Ltd. (2001) 3 KLR (pt. 118) 873

PRACTICE & PROCEDURE - Mistake of counsel - Court will not punish a litigant - For the mistake of his counsel (H2) Ogundoyin v. Adeyemi (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 127) 2687; (2001) 13 NWLR (Pt. 730) 403


INDEX OF SUBJECT MATTER TO NOVEL CA DECISIONS

PRACTICE & PROCEDURE - Native or customary courts - Procedure - Courts making use of such courts' decisions - Should allow some latitude in procedure - Provided substantial justice was done (H2) Duru v. Onwumelu (2001) 12 KLR (pt. 130) 3287; (2001) 18 NWLR (Pt. 746) 672

PRACTICE & PROCEDURE - Non suit - Civil proceedings - Balance of probabilities as basis for judgment - Overwhelming evidence - Makes order of non suit improper (H2) Nsirim v. Onuma Construction Co. Ltd. (2001) 3 KLR (pt. 118) 853; (2001) 7 NWLR (Pt. 713) 742

PRACTICE & PROCEDURE - Notice of discontinuance - Brings the action against the defendant to an end - And any judgment given against remaining defendants - Will not affect that defendant (H2) Ogunkunle v. Cherubim & Seraphim (2001) 6 KLR (pt. 124) 2115; (2001) 12 NWLR (Pt. 727) 359

PRACTICE & PROCEDURE - Parties - Inaction of a party - Where a party fails to exercise his right - To anticipate the case of a his opponent of which he had notice - He cannot complain on appeal - Of his own inaction (H6) Aseimo v. Abraham (2001) 6 KLR (pt. 124) 2125; (2001) 16 NWLR (Pt. 738) 20

PRACTICE & PROCEDURE - Parties - Misjoinder - Where the decision is likely to affect some of the defendants - They are rightly joined - As necessary parties (H3) A-G Fed v. A-G Abia (2001) 7 KLR (pt. 127) 2599; (2001) 11 NWLR (Pt. 725) 689

PRACTICE & PROCEDURE - Parties - Necessary party - Though not joined in the action initially - But having been joined as a third party by the defendants' application -The proceedings is regularized thereby (H3) Labode v. Otubu (2001) 3 KLR (pt. 117) 699; (2001) 7 NWLR (Pt. 712) 256

PRACTICE & PROCEDURE - Pleadings - Admitted facts - Cannot be retracted - And does not need further proof by evidence - But it is binding and can be acted upon by the court (H1) Adeye v. Adesanya


INDEX OF SUBJECT MATTER TO NOVEL CA DECISIONS

(2001) 2 KLR (pt. 116) 595; (2001) 6 NWLR (Pt. 708) 1

PRACTICE & PROCEDURE - Pleadings - Amendment - Appellate court should not use its discretion - To give approval for an amendment - Prompted by the findings of trial court - In favour of one party (H5) Kode v. Yussuf (2001) 2 KLR (pt. 115) 457; (2001) 4 NWLR (Pt. 703) 392

PRACTICE & PROCEDURE - Pleadings - Amendment - Could be allowed at any time - Except in certain circumstances (H3) Kode v. Yussuf (2001) 2 KLR (pt. 115) 457; (2001) 4 NWLR (Pt. 703) 392

PRACTICE & PROCEDURE - Pleadings - Amendment - Which is designed to overreach - By making a ground of appeal useless - Constitutes an abuse of process of court - And ought to be dismissed (H4) Kode v. Yussuf (2001) 2 KLR (pt. 115) 457; (2001) 4 NWLR (Pt. 703) 392

PRACTICE & PROCEDURE - Pleadings - Amendment sought on appeal - Is incompetent - As it will require defendant - To amend his statement of defence - And lead new evidence thereon - Giving the case a completely different complexion (H7) Kode v. Yussuf (2001) 2 KLR (pt. 115) 457; (2001) 4 NWLR (Pt. 703) 392

PRACTICE & PROCEDURE - Pleadings - Defendant cannot rely on a defence - Which was open to him - But was not pleaded at the trial court (H11) IBWA v. Imano Ltd. (2001) 3 KLR (pt. 118) 873

PRACTICE & PROCEDURE - Pleadings - Evidence - Pleadings do not amount to evidence - And failure to adduce evidence in challenge of evidence of plaintiff - Is deemed to be acceptance of his evidence - Despite the general traverse (H9) IBWA v. Imano Ltd. (2001) 3 KLR (pt. 118) 873

PRACTICE & PROCEDURE - Pleadings - Evidence - Representative capacity - Where the pleadings and the evidence of a party - Disclose a representative capacity - Judgment can be entered for such a party - Even if an amendment to reflect that capacity has not been obtained (H14) Kyari v. Alkali (2001) 5 KLR (pt. 123) 1753; (2001) 11 NWLR (Pt. 724) 412